Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 6 - Descriptive Accuracy in Interview-Based Case Studies

  • from Part II - Ensuring High-Quality Case Studies
  • Edited by Jennifer Widner, Princeton University, New Jersey, Michael Woolcock, Daniel Ortega Nieto
  • Book:
    The Case for Case Studies
    Published online:
    05 May 2022
    Print publication:
    26 May 2022, pp 119-141
    • Chapter
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Summary

    Widner reflects on what she and others have learned about gathering reliable information from interviews. Case study researchers usually draw on many types of evidence, some qualitative and some quantitative. For understanding motivation/interest, anticipated challenges, strategic choices, steps taken, unexpected obstacles encountered, and other elements of implementation, interviews with people who were “in the room where it happens” are usually essential. Subject matter, proximity to elections or other sensitive events, interviewer self-presentation, question sequence, probes, and ethics safeguards are among the factors that shape the reliability of information offered in an interview. Widner sketches ways to improve the accuracy of recall and level of detail, and to guard against “spin,” drawing on her program’s experience as well as the work of survey researchers and anthropologists.