Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 23 - Corporate Compliance and Climate Change

  • from Part IV - Private Sector Initiatives to Promote Disaster Resilience and Recovery
  • Edited by Susan S. Kuo, John Travis Marshall, Ryan Rowberry
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Disaster Law and Policy
    Published online:
    27 October 2022
    Print publication:
    29 September 2022, pp 378-386

  • Summary

    Climate change has dramatically increased the frequency and severity of disasters including hurricanes, floods, wildfires, droughts, and pandemics. In a globally connected economy, climate-change fueled disasters disrupt supply chains and upend markets, affecting corporations no matter where they are located. From a risk-management perspective, however, climate change is just another external threat to hedge against, no different in principle than the risk that interest rates might rise or that an economic downturn could reduce the demand for a corporation’s products or services. Thus, corporations have reason to address the problem of climate change, but only to the extent that corporations can thereby produce value for their shareholders. This chapter argues, to the contrary, that climate change should trigger a compliance response. Unlike risk management, a compliance-based approach would require corporations to internalize the problem of climate change and to give it priority over competing considerations.