We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A special economic zone (SEZ) is considered as a successful policy instrument in China’s own reform. Not only Chinese government and enterprises, but also African governments want to borrow this model to stimulate development in Africa. A handful of Chinese economic cooperation zones have been constructed in Africa since early 2000s, but the outcome was not satisfactory. By tracking the progress of six major cooperation zones, the author argues that there is no so-called “Chinese Model” of SEZ development. The key to SEZs’ success is to build synergism between the zones and the host countries’ structural transformation. Situated in very different political-economic contexts, the Sino-African cooperation zones struggle to build their connection with the development of host countries in terms of infrastructure harmonization, skill spillover, business linkage, and strategy coordination. However, after decade-long experiments, the zones have generated incremental policy impacts. Ethiopia, Egypt, and Zambia launched new industrial zone programs with Chinese participation, while other countries gave different degrees of support for building zones. Coupled with a large amount of inflowing manufacturing investments from China, the renewed initiative of zonal development is poised to impact Africa’s industrial landscape.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.