We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter focuses on the idea of constructive engagement, an umbrella term for mediated and non-mediated forms of communication in which differences can be expressed, respected, and resolved. Hartmut Wessler identifies three ways current scholarship can shift to better address the topic: first, to move from research that emphasizes voice to the practices associated with listening; second, to turn from disruptive conflict toward identifying the potential for integrative conflict; and third, by moving from modes of argumentation to research that examines the “self-transcendent emotions” that fuel constructive interaction with individuals across social divides. Wessler suggests that focusing on constructive engagement can link long-standing concerns articulated by theorists like Habermas focused on rational-critical deliberation with efforts made by social theorists like Georg Simmel, Lewis Coser, and Helmut Dubiel to highlight the integrative and constructive potential of robust but contained conflicts.
Chapter 5 analyzes how the Reagan administration and members of Congress contested US policy toward South Africa’s apartheid regime of institutionalized racial segregation. The chapter examines the administration’s policy of constructive engagement designed to encourage gradual South African reforms through quiet diplomacy while reaffirming US support for the anti-communist and US-friendly regime. Centered on the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), the chapter then traces congressional efforts to impose various economic measures against South Africa. It demonstrates how members of Congress collaborated with the wider anti-apartheid movement through participation in protests, staged arrests, and the creation of the Free South Africa Movement. Crucially, members of Congress sought to change US policy through the imposition of economic sanctions through legislation. Tracing the legislative battles over sanctions, the chapter shows how a growing congressional coalition, spearheaded by the CBC, framed apartheid as a human rights issue. Under increasing political pressure to distance themselves from apartheid and constructive engagement, moderate Republicans came to favor sanctions, leading to the imposition of the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act in 1986 overriding a presidential veto. The chapter argues that framing of apartheid as a human rights issue contributed to the successful imposition of sanctions.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.