We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To compare the dosimetric characteristics and treatment delivery efficiency of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) patients previously treated with a 6 MV-FFF (flattening filter-free; radiation beam obtained by removing the flattening filter) beam versus those re-planned with a 10 MV-FFF beam using a conical collimator on the TrueBeam Novalis STx linear accelerator.
Methods:
Eleven patients with TN previously treated with a 6 MV-FFF beam following the SRS protocol of 90 Gy in a single fraction were selected. Plans were recalculated using 10 MV-FFF beam, maintaining the same dose prescription and beam angle configuration used with 6 MV-FFF beam. The dose gradient, volumes receiving 20 and 10 Gy, maximum dose and dose to 10% of the brainstem were recorded for both the energies. Efficiency was assessed by the average monitor unit (MU) and time per arc. The 10 MV-FFF machine was configured in the treatment planning system (TPS) to measure the tissue phantom ratio (TPR), dose profiles and scatter factors using RAZOR, PTW-60012 diodes and EBT3 radiochromic films.
Results:
Compared to the 6 MV-FFF, the 10 MV-FFF plans exhibit average increments in dose gradient, volume of 20 Gy and volume of 10 Gy of 3.8, 17.1 and 17.8%, respectively. Average increases of 6.5 and 18.1% were obtained for maximum dose and dose to 10% of the brainstem, respectively. An average increase of 31 MU/arc was observed for the 10 MV-FFF plans, with a 40% reduction in treatment time per arc. The TPR for the 10 MV-FFF beams increased by 10%, and a penumbra width of 0.3 mm was observed. Scatter factor increments of 15, 13.5, 12.7 and 10.3% were observed for the 6 MV-FFF over the 10 MV-FFF for cones of 4, 5, 6 and 7 mm, respectively.
Conclusions:
In TN SRS, the utilisation of 10 MV-FFF beams reduces treatment duration but results in an increased brainstem radiation dose. To mitigate this increase in brainstem dose, it is necessary to adjust the isocentre position.
The miniaturized conical cones for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) make it challenging in measurement of dosimetric data needed for commissioning of treatment planning system. This study aims at validating dosimetric characteristics of conical cone collimator manufactured by Varian using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation technique.
Methods & Material:
Percentage depth dose (PDD), tissue maximum ratio (TMR), lateral dose profile (LDP) and output factor (OF) were measured for cones with diameters of 5mm, 7·5mm, 10mm, 12·5 mm, 15 mm and 17·5 mm using EDGE detector for 6MV flattening filter-free (FFF) beam from Truebeam linac. Similarly, MC modelling of linac for 6MVFFF beam and simulation of conical cones were performed in PRIMO. Subsequently, measured beam data were validated by comparing them with results obtained from MC simulation.
Results:
The measured and MC-simulated PDDs or TMRs showed close agreement within 3% except for cone of 5mm diameter. Deviations between measured and simulated PDDs or TMRs were substantially higher for 5mm cone. The maximum deviations at depth of 10cm, 20cm and at range of 50% dose were found 4·05%, 7·52%, 5·52% for PDD and 4·04%, 7·03%, 5·23% for TMR with 5mm cone, respectively. The measured LDPs acquired for all the cones showed close agreement with MC LDPs except in penumbra region around 80% and 20% dose profile. Measured and MC full-width half maxima of dose profiles agreed with nominal cone size within ± 0·2 mm. Measured and MC OFs showed excellent agreement for cone sizes ≥10 mm. However, deviation consistently increases as the size of the cone gets smaller.
Findings:
MC model of conical cones for SRS has been presented and validated. Very good agreement was found between experimentally measured and MC-simulated data. The dosimetry dataset obtained in this study validated using MC model may be used to benchmark beam data measured for commissioning of SRS for cone planning.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.