We studied the visuomotor activity of corticotectal (CT) cells in two visual cortical areas [area 17 and the posteromedial lateral suprasylvian cortex (PMLS)] of the cat. The cats were trained in simple oculomotor tasks, and head position was fixed. Most CT cells in both cortical areas gave a vigorous discharge to a small stimulus used to control gaze when it fell within the retinotopically defined visual field. However, the vigor of the visual response did not predict latency to initiate a saccade, saccade velocity, amplitude, or even if a saccade would be made, minimizing any potential role these cells might have in premotor or attentional processes. Most CT cells in both areas were selective for direction of stimulus motion, and cells in PMLS showed a direction preference favoring motion away from points of central gaze. CT cells did not discharge with eye movements in the dark. During eye movements in the light, many CT cells in area 17 increased their activity. In contrast, cells in PMLS, including CT cells, were generally unresponsive during saccades. Paradoxically, cells in PMLS responded vigorously to stimuli moving at saccadic velocities, indicating that the oculomotor system suppresses visual activity elicited by moving the retina across an illuminated scene. Nearly all CT cells showed oscillatory activity in the frequency range of 20–90 Hz, especially in response to visual stimuli. However, this activity was capricious; strong oscillations in one trial could disappear in the next despite identical stimulus conditions. Although the CT cells in both of these regions share many characteristics, the direction anisotropy and the suppression of activity during eye movements which characterize the neurons in PMLS suggests that these two areas have different roles in facilitating perceptual/motor processes at the level of the superior colliculus.

We studied the visuomotor properties of 645 neurons in area 6 of five cats trained in oculomotor tasks. The area we recorded from corresponds well with territories believed to contain the feline homologue of the frontal eye fields observed in primates. Despite an expectation that cells with pre-saccadic activity would be common, only a small fraction (∼5%) of the cells displayed activity that could be linked to subsequent saccadic eye movements. These pre-motor cells appeared to be distributed over a broad region of cortex mixed in with other cell types. As in primates, saccade-related activity tended to occur only during “purposeful” saccades. At least 30% (208/645) of the neurons were visual, with many of these cells possessing huge receptive fields that appeared to include the entire contralateral visual field. Visual responsiveness was generally attenuated by fixation during the oculomotor tasks. Although attentional mechanisms may play a role in this attenuation, this cortical area also exhibits powerful lateral interactions in which spatially displaced visual stimuli suppress each other. Most cells, visually responsive or not, were affected by fixation. Nearly equal proportions of cells showed increases or decreases in activity during fixation. For many of the cells affected by fixation, the source of this modulation appears to reflect cognitive, rather than sensory or motor processes. This included cells that showed anticipatory activity, and cells that responded to the reward only when it was presented in the context of the task. Based on the paucity of pre-saccadic neurons, it would be difficult to conclude that this region of cortex in the cat is homologous to the frontal eye fields of the monkey. However, when considered in the context of differences in the oculomotor habits of these two animals, we believe the homology fits. In addition to pre-motor neurons, the properties of several other cell types found in this area could contribute to the control of gaze.