We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This single-centre, retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the predictors of early peritoneal dialysis initiation in newborns and young infants undergoing cardiac surgery.
Methods:
There were fifty-seven newborns and young infants. All subjects received peritoneal dialysis catheter after completion of the cardiopulmonary bypass. Worsening post-operative (post-op) positive fluid balance and oliguria (<1 ml/kg/hour) despite furosemide were the clinical indications to start early peritoneal dialysis (peritoneal dialysis +). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from the pre-operative, intra-operative, and immediately post-operative periods.
Results:
Baseline demographic data were indifferent except that peritoneal dialysis + group had more newborns. Pre-operative serum creatinine was higher for peritoneal dialysis + group (p = 0.025). Peritoneal dialysis + group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.044), longer aorta cross-clamp time (p = 0.044), and less urine output during post-op 24 hours (p = 0.008). In the univariate logistic regression model, pre-op serum creatinine was significantly associated with higher odds of being in peritoneal dialysis + (p = 0.021) and post-op systolic blood pressure (p = 0.018) and post-op mean arterial pressure (p=0.001) were significantly associated with reduced odds of being in peritoneal dialysis + (p = 0.018 and p = 0.001, respectively). Post-op mean arterial pressure showed a statistically significant association adjusted odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [0.81, 0.96], p = 0.004) with peritoneal dialysis + in multivariate analysis after adjusting for age at surgery.
Conclusions:
In our single-centre cohort, pre-op serum creatinine, post-op systolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure demonstrated statistically significant association with peritoneal dialysis +. This finding may help to better risk stratify newborns and young infants for early peritoneal dialysis start following cardiac surgery.
Evaluating the association of water intake and hydration status with nephrolithiasis risk at the population level.
Design:
It is a cross-sectional study in which daily total plain water intake and total fluid intake were estimated together with blood osmolality, urine creatinine, urine osmolality, urine flow rate (UFR), free water clearance (FWC) and urine/blood osmolality ratio (Uosm:Bosm). The associations of fluid intake and hydration markers with nephrolithiasis were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.
Setting:
General US population.
Participants:
A total of 8195 adults aged 20 years or older from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey 2009–2012 cycles.
Results:
The population medians (interquartile ranges, IQR) for daily total plain water intake and total fluid intake were 807 (336–1481) and 2761 (2107–3577) ml/d, respectively. The adjusted OR (95 % CI) of nephrolithiasis for each IQR increase in total plain water intake and total fluid intake were 0·92 (95 % CI 0·79, 1·06) and 0·84 (95 % CI 0·72, 0·97), respectively. The corresponding OR of nephrolithiasis for UFR, blood osmolality, Uosm:Bosm and urine creatinine were 0·87 (95 % CI 0·76, 0·99), 1·18 (95 % CI 1·06, 1·32), 1·38 (95 % CI 1·17, 1·63) and 1·27 (95 % CI 1·11, 1·45), respectively. A linear protective relationship of fluid intake, UFR and FWC with nephrolithiasis risk was observed. Similarly, positive dose–response associations of nephrolithiasis risk with markers of insufficient hydration were identified. Encouraging a daily water intake of >2500 ml/d and maintaining a urine output of 2 l/d was associated with a lower prevalence of nephrolithiasis.
Conclusion:
This study verified the beneficial role of general water intake recommendations in nephrolithiasis prevention in the general US population.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.