We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Both Boss (Starz, 2011–2012) and Empire (FOX, 2015–) were conceived as modern retellings of King Lear. Tom Kane, the corrupt mayor of Chicago in Boss, and Lucious Lyon, the African-American CEO of Empire Entertainment in Empire, both diagnosed with an incurable neurological disease at the beginning of the shows, are Lear figures who now have no option but to ‘crawl toward death’. From this premise, both Empire and Boss significantly rework the Lear character arc as well as the family pattern derived from Shakespeare’s play, not only by regendering Lear’s children in Empire or subtracting two daughters in Boss, but also by adding a wife and mother. Both shows, then, use material from King Lear in the loose way characteristic of ‘Shakespearean’ drama series such as House of Cards (Netflix, 2013–) or Game of Thrones (HBO, 2011–). This chapterexamines to what extent each show’s specific production context aesthetically and ideologically informed its appropriation of King Lear, looking at the way each series’s recycling and reconfiguring of material from King Lear contributes to its exploration of family relationships, physical and mental degradation, loyalty and betrayal, ambition and power, and interacts with issues of gender and race.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.