We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In view of the paucity of data on energy costs, the present study aimed to estimate these for typical daily activities performed by women in rural India.
Design
A cross-sectional study covering 26 different activities was done by indirect calorimetry using the Oxylog™ instrument (Morgan).
Settings
Villages about 30–40 km from Pune city, Maharashtra, India.
Subjects
Energy costs were measured on 22 rural Indian women aged 18–45 years.
Results
Irrespective of whether an activity was domestic or farming, energy cost was lower when performed in sitting position (cleaning grains 5.24 kJ min−1, plucking leafy vegetables 5.76 kJ min−1) and increased considerably with the extent of muscular movement (carrying two water containers 14.77 kJ min−1, chopping firewood 14.5 kJ min−1), indicating the importance of the postural details of the activity. Physical activity ratio computed using the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations University equation (PARw) was lower for all activities compared with that (PARm) based on measured basal metabolic rate, indicating the need for a population-specific equation. Furthermore, PARw identified more activities as belonging to the ‘very light’ category (nine out of 26 activities), in contrast to the perception of rural women which was supported with empirical evidence. Estimated daily energy expenditure of the women was 7.69 ± 0.63 MJ (1837 ± 150 kcal) and identified their daily activity pattern as ‘moderate’ based on PALw (1.65 ± 0.16) while PALm (2.04 ± 0.18) identified it as ‘heavy’.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the importance of qualitative descriptions of the various activities. The energy costs for several daily activities reported in this study could potentially be used for estimating daily energy expenditure of women from similar rural settings.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.