We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 5 discusses the bureaucratic characteristics of Confucianism, and the shaping of administrative competition enforcement. It explores the continuity between ancient bureaucratic practices and modern administrative structures. While competition law is making important strides in the countries concerned, old traditions have impeded a more complete trust in open markets. The chapter recounts the influence of the Confucian heritage and discusses the bureaucratic elements that derive from that tradition, all of which sheds light on the features of the administrative model in East Asia. Since far-reaching reforms such as the abandonment of the administrative model would entail profound upheaval and are unlikely, the chapter underlines the feasibility of less radical improvements. In this regard, more effective enforcement appears to require a modernization of bureaucratic systems. Among other things, the chapter advocates reforms that would: enhance the independence of competition authorities from government; increase accountability through checks and balances; and promote predictability and certainty through transparency in rules, policies and decision-making.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.