We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We aimed to (1) report updated estimates of direct healthcare costs for people living with MS (pwMS), (2) contrast costs to a control population and (3) explore differences between disability levels among pwMS.
Methods:
Administrative data were used to identify adult pwMS (MS cohort) and without (control cohort) in Alberta, Canada; disability level (based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale) among pwMS was estimated. One- and two-part generalized linear models with gamma distribution were used to estimate the incremental direct healthcare cost (2021 $CDN) of MS during a 1-year observation period.
Results:
Adjusting for confounders, the total healthcare cost ratio was higher in the MS cohort (n = 13,089) versus control (n = 150,080) (5.24 [95% CI: 5.08, 5.41]) with a predicted incremental cost of $15,016 (95% CI: $14,497, $15,535) per person-year. Among the MS cohort, total predicted direct healthcare costs were higher with greater disability, $14,430 (95% CI: $13,980, $14,880) to $58,697 ($51,514, $65,879) per person-year in mild and severe disability, respectively. The primary health resource cost component shifted from disease-modifying therapies in mild disability to supportive care in moderate and severe disability.
Conclusion:
Adult pwMS had greater direct healthcare costs than those without. Extrapolating to the population level (where 14,485 adult pwMS were identified in the study), it is estimated that $218 million per year in healthcare costs may be attributable to MS in Alberta. The significantly larger economic impact associated with greater disability underscores the importance of preventing or delaying disease progression and functional impairment in MS.
Major depressive disorder (MDD), especially in case of suicidal risk, is a psychiatric emergency, associated with high patient burden and healthcare resource utilization. Although active and urgent treatment is crucial, little is known on comprehensive care management of this condition in Italy.
Objectives
Here we report the ARIANNA study [NCT04463108] interim results to primarily describe the treatment utilization pathways of patients with MDD and active suicidal ideation with intent in the current clinical practice in Italy.
Methods
This observational prospective cohort study included adult patients with a moderate-to-severe major depressive episode (MDE) and active suicidality from 24 Italian sites. Real-world data on patient characteristics, treatments, clinical outcomes, and healthcare utilization were collected during a 90-day follow-up. Data collection is still ongoing.
Results
Sixty-four evaluable patients were considered for this interim analysis: 41 (64.1%) females, mean [SD] age 46.0 [15.4] years, a concomitant psychiatric diagnosis in 7 (10.9%), and other comorbidities in 26 (40.6%). The baseline mean [SD] MADRS total score was 37.5 [7.2], with severe MDE and prior suicidal behavior in 30 (46.9%) and 21 (32.8%) patients, respectively. Median [25th;75th percentiles] duration of current MDE was 1.1 [0.3;2.1] months. Acute inpatient hospitalization was provided for 43 (67.2%) patients. Antidepressant augmentation with mood stabilizers and/or antipsychotic drugs and optimization were the most frequent early standard-of-care treatment regimens in 32 (53.3%) and 24 (40.0%) patients with available data (N=60), respectively.
Conclusions
Our preliminary results suggest that initial treatment approaches in this critical population are mostly polypharmacological and delivered as inpatient care, with consequent intensive resource utilization.
Disclosure
The ARIANNA study was sponsored by Janssen-Cilag SpA, Italy. DD and MA are employees of Janssen-Cilag SpA. DA and BR are employees of MediNeos S.U.R.L., a company subject to the direction and coordination of IQVIA Solutions HQ Ltd.
Interest in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in schizophrenia has grown recently due to documented incremental mortality. C-reactive protein (CRP) has been assessed as a marker in individuals with CVD and/or at high risk of developing it. However, its role in schizophrenia patients is unknown. The goal of this research was thus to explore the use of CRP as a marker of CVD risk in patients with schizophrenia.
Methods
A cross-sectional analysis of the Badalona Serveis Assistencials (BSA) administrative claims database was conducted including all subjects aged > 18 years with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder. CRP measurement, sociodemographics, medical history, 10-year CVD risk (Framingham function) and clinical chemistry data were extracted for analysis.
Results
Seven hundred and five patients (53.0% men, 48.2 [15.8] years, 78.7% on atypicals) met criteria for analysis. Mean 10-year CVD risk was high; 11.9 ± 5.7% and mean CRP levels were 2.6 ± 2.5 mg/L with 30.4% showing above-normative levels (> 3 mg/L). After adjusting for age, gender, smoking and presence of neoplasm or inflammatory diseases, CRP was linearly associated with 10-year CVD risk stratified by risk (low, moderate, high/very high): respectively, 2.3 (95% CI: 2.1–2.5), 3.1 (2.6–3.5) and 3.7 (3.2–4.1) mg/L; F = 13.5, P < 0.001. Patients with known CVD also showed higher CRP levels: 3.7 (2.9–4.5) vs. 2.5 (2.4–2.7) mg/L, P = 0.008; and higher probability of above-normal values; odds ratio = 4.71 (2.01–11.04), P < 0.001.
Conclusions
High CRP levels above normative were associated with both known CVD and high/very high 10-year risk of a CVD event in patients with schizophrenia, suggesting CRP could be a marker of CVD in this psychiatric disorder.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.