Psychological distress is common among palliative care patients. Despite this, little is known about the availability of psychological services to support palliative care patients within Australia. This study aimed to determine the level of psychological support services available within Australian Palliative Care Services. The study was based on a similar study in Australia by Crawford in 1999, allowing differences over time to be examined.

A 12-item online survey was distributed to adult Palliative Care Services throughout Australia from November 2021 to January 2022. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of responses was conducted, with comparisons made with the 1999 study using a 2-proportions z-test.

Social workers were the most available professionals delivering psychological care (prevalence of 94.1%), followed by spiritual care workers (62.5%), creative therapists (43.8%), counselors (36.4%), psychiatrists (31.3%), complementary therapists (28.1%), and psychologists (25.0%). Nearly 60% of services had no access to a psychiatrist or a psychologist. The proportion of Palliative Care Services that had access to a psychiatrist, psychologist, or counselor was significantly less in 2021/22 compared to 1999, with differences of 29.4% (p = 0.002), 23.4% (p = 0.015), and 26.1% (p = 0.006), respectively.

Lack of access to psychiatrists, psychologists, and counselors in Australian Palliative Care Services remains a significant issue and has become more prevalent since 1999. Ongoing advocacy and increased government funding to enable psychological health professionals to be readily employed in Palliative Care Services is vital.

Although no drugs are licensed for the treatment of personality disorder, pharmacological treatment in clinical practice remains common.

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of psychotropic drug use and associations with psychological service use among people with personality disorder.

Using data from a large, anonymised mental healthcare database, we identified all adult patients with a diagnosis of personality disorder and ascertained psychotropic medication use between 1 August 2015 and 1 February 2016. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed, adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical and service use factors, to examine the association between psychological services use and psychotropic medication prescribing.

Of 3366 identified patients, 2029 (60.3%) were prescribed some form of psychotropic medication. Patients using psychological services were significantly less likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication (adjusted odds ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.39–0.59, P<0.001) such as antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants. This effect was maintained following several sensitivity analyses. We found no difference in the risk for mood stabiliser (adjusted odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.57–1.10, P = 0.169) and multi-class psychotropic use (adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.60–1.07, P = 0.133) between patients who did and did not use psychological services.

Psychotropic medication prescribing is common in patients with personality disorder, but significantly less likely in those who have used psychological services. This does not appear to be explained by differences in demographic, clinical and service use characteristics. There is a need to develop clear prescribing guidelines and conduct research in clinical settings to examine medication effectiveness for this population.

Deaths by suicide have been increasing in recent years in Ireland, many of whom have co-morbid mental health difficulties and/or have attended primary care services 1 month before death.

To profile how ‘Access to Psychological Services Ireland’ (APSI) provides stepped-care therapies for mild-to-moderate adult mental health presentations and the potential effectiveness of this model based on comparison to a review of evidence-based strategies in suicide prevention. A secondary aim is to highlight how APSI has the potential to target those at risk of suicide and provide an integrative after-care service to complement secondary care mental health services.

In a context of inter-agency working, APSI provides an integrated continuum of suicide prevention interventions that map onto or intervene across the continuum of suicide behaviour. Hence, APSI appears to implement what the literature suggests will work in preventing suicide. However, outcome research is needed to establish APSI’s impact in preventing suicide.

It is recommended that Irish-based research is conducted to establish APSI’s impact in preventing suicide with a view to rolling out APSI as a national mental health clinical care programme.