Search

This is a discussion paper prepared by the Compliance/Peer Review Working Party of the Professional Affairs Board. It considers the monitoring of compliance with the professional conduct standard and guidance notes, how this is being done, and whether changes need to be made to the monitoring in the light of on-going changes to the regulation of financial services.

This second paper from the Compliance/Peer Review Working Party of the Professional Affairs Board sets out the reasons for introducing peer review within the profession, and outlines the areas of professional difficulty identified. The main recommendation is that peer review by an actuary's colleagues in his firm should be carried out on all relevant work before presentation to the client (whether an internal or external client). The situations in which this practice would be mandatory are also set out and, initially, these will relate to mandatory guidance in practising certificate areas.

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

2 results

Monitoring Compliance with Professional Guidance. A Discussion Paper prepared by the Compliance/Peer Review Working Party of the Professional Affairs Board

Monitoring Compliance with Professional Guidance Revisited. A Further Discussion Paper Prepared by the Compliance/Peer Review Working Party of the Professional Affairs Board

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

2 results

Monitoring Compliance with Professional Guidance. A Discussion Paper prepared by the Compliance/Peer Review Working Party of the Professional Affairs Board

Monitoring Compliance with Professional Guidance Revisited. A Further Discussion Paper Prepared by the Compliance/Peer Review Working Party of the Professional Affairs Board