We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 8 analyses the patterns of change and the state of the respective systems. Comparative analysis provides an understanding of the types and nature of change, drawing attention to system-wide and localised modifications to advisory instruments. It also highlights distinct types of changes and the shared and distinct trajectories that have impacted the configuration and operation of these systems. The analysis focuses on differences in types of change by adapting Hall’s (1993) three ‘orders’ of change: first-order policy advisory systems (PAS) changes involving routine adjustments to existing practices or units; second-order change addressing the ascendency and decline of categories of advisers and shifts in advisory practices; and third-order macro-level changes. The trajectories of PAS change are distinguished by differences in tempo and sequencing, some being gradual and longer-term (e.g., erosion of public service capacity), while others are abrupt and transformational (e.g., responses to the global financial crisis). The cases feature different sequencing when (de)institutionalisation occurs (e.g., partisan advisers). The dynamics of externalisation and politicisation are reappraised using subtypes that reveal their breadth. The flexibility and adaptability inherent in PAS, government preferences and environmental pressures will lead to continuing change and the need for comprehensive approaches to understand it.
To advance understanding of nutrition change dynamics and strategies needed to tackle complex global nutrition challenges.
Design
Two frameworks, a descriptive framework of orders of change and a change model (Theory U), are introduced to advance understanding of how to promote effective action on a complex social problem like nutrition. The descriptive framework explores the types of change pursued by four current global nutrition initiatives and the strategies they use to achieve their goals. Theory U provides a conceptual model to help understand breakthrough or transformative change, i.e. change that shifts the entire system.
Setting
The focus is on global and regional nutrition initiatives.
Results
Using the criteria of desired outcomes, purpose, participation and process, the orders of change framework categorizes programme strategies according to the levels of change likely to be achieved. Such a framework can help to structure conversations among actors about prerequisites for, and the likelihood of, transformative change. Theory U provides a conceptual framework to facilitate transformative change by providing insight into change processes and levers for action.
Conclusions
Nutrition is a complex social issue, and not only a biological or technical challenge. But nutritionists seldom inquire into the nature of changes required to achieve goals or the processes through which change occurs. Lack of understanding and failure to address such change processes directly mean that nutrition policies and programmes continue to fall short. There is a need to understand the dynamics of change in nutrition; to learn from current change experiences; and to create dynamic learning communities.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.