We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter reconsiders midcentury Mexican literary history through the lens of the concept of bearing witness (“dar testimonio”). Taking speeches by Rosario Castellanos and Miguel Angel Asturias as its starting point, the chapter argues that the idea of bearing witness and expressing solidarity with marginalized groups shaped Latin American and specifically Mexican literature in the period 1930-80. Looking again at the Mexican canon in this period from this fresh perspective, an overlooked tradition of women authors emerges. These women write out of solidarity with and to bear witness to the experiences and sufferings of less privileged others. Women authors are often grouped together on the basis of their gender. Yet, this chapter identifies alternative connections between better-known Mexican women authors such as Elena Poniatowska, Nellie Campobello, and Rosario Castellanos and others who are less often the focus of critical attention, including Benita Galeana, Carlota O’Neill, Ascensión Hernández de León-Portilla, and Elvira Vargas. Focusing on the act of bearing witness brings to the fore the contributions of women authors and the connections between them, as well as encouraging us to consider alternative ways of writing literary history based on new categories and periodizations.
This chapter reconsiders midcentury Mexican literary history through the lens of the concept of bearing witness (“dar testimonio”). Taking speeches by Rosario Castellanos and Miguel Angel Asturias as its starting point, the chapter argues that the idea of bearing witness and expressing solidarity with marginalized groups shaped Latin American and specifically Mexican literature in the period 1930-80. Looking again at the Mexican canon in this period from this fresh perspective, an overlooked tradition of women authors emerges. These women write out of solidarity with and to bear witness to the experiences and sufferings of less privileged others. Women authors are often grouped together on the basis of their gender. Yet, this chapter identifies alternative connections between better-known Mexican women authors such as Elena Poniatowska, Nellie Campobello, and Rosario Castellanos and others who are less often the focus of critical attention, including Benita Galeana, Carlota O’Neill, Ascensión Hernández de León-Portilla, and Elvira Vargas. Focusing on the act of bearing witness brings to the fore the contributions of women authors and the connections between them, as well as encouraging us to consider alternative ways of writing literary history based on new categories and periodizations.
Changes in reading practices, fostered by feminist movements pushing to diversify the canon, have led to the rediscovery and reevaluation of the work of many women writers. The literary tradition and established social norms served to influence readers and their decisions either to accept or to reject certain discursive forms. The tone was set by the most obvious features of social realism, inevitably linked to the armed conflict that began in 1910 and remained very much alive in the memory of artists and their public. This chapter focuses on two cases: Nellie Campobello and Maria Luisa Ocampo Heredia. The tragedy of the removal, disappearance, and subsequent discovery of the remains of Campobello many years after her death attracted a great deal of media attention and led to a renewed interest in the writer and her work. The social inequalities associated with gender are a constant presence in the narrative of Ocampo and with even greater force than in her plays.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.