We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The 1830s was a golden age for geology in Britain, in which at least three decades of commitment to patient observation, inductive reasoning, and fieldwork had led to a newfound public confidence for the science. Historians have long argued that a cult of masculinity emerged in response to this climate: physically and intellectually robust, the ‘gentleman geologist’ alone could be trusted to make reliable observations of the Earth without lapsing into theological or evolutionary speculation. Focussing on the work of three women geologists – Maria Graham, Charlotte Murchison, and Maria Hack – this chapter argues against this male history of geology. Paying attention to the deeply intertwined labours of male and female geologists in this period reveals that gender was a tool in a serious debate about the role of the body – of the emotions and the senses – in scientific observation. Was it possible, geologists asked, to apprehend the natural world entirely unencumbered by emotion, attachment, or the vagaries of the senses? What kinds of bodies could encounter the Earth in its most extreme guises and still achieve the right philosophical perspective and detachment?
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.