Goldsmith’s status as an Enlightenment writer is a matter of debate. He was a translator of French Enlightenment writing for an anglophone audience, but he was also, in his verse and elsewhere, a traditionalist whose worldview could sit oddly with the progressive nature of much of his prose output. In accounting for a multiplicity of enlightenments, categorized in terms of the intellectual cultures of different nations, this chapter studies Goldsmith’s relationship to a more plural enlightenment, an Irish variant on a more general enlightenment commitment to an improved future.

The Molyneux problem is a question about the nature of sensory perception that was first posed by William Molyneux, the founder of the Dublin Philosophical Society, in correspondence with the English philosopher John Locke in 1688. The problem asks whether a blind man who has learned to distinguish between different shapes by his sense of touch alone would be able, upon having his vision restored, to make the same distinctions using only his sense of sight. Molyneux’s question has been called the most important problem in the history of Irish philosophy, and the reason for its significance is the wide variety of epistemological, theological, linguistic, and aesthetic considerations to which it gave rise. This chapter identifies and documents the major stages in the early development of Molyneux’s problem in eighteenth-century Ireland, England, and France. Along the way, the chapter draws on contemporary religious analogies, surgical evidence, and fictional experiments in order to bring a new perspective to current debates about the meaning of ‘Enlightenment’ in eighteenth-century Irish intellectual culture.