We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 4 explores how transnational, antifascist constructions of blackness in Mexico allowed anthropologist Gonzalo Aguirre Beltrán and artist-cum-ethnographer Miguel Covarrubias to trace Mexican cultural expressions back to Africa. It shows how Mexican and Afro-diasporic politics converged during the Second World War, when Mexico transformed into an ideal site for the inter-American study of indigenous and African-descended peoples and cultures. With Mexico City as the headquarters for the International Institute of Afro-American Studies, an impressive cohort of scholars concerned with blackness in the Americas -- including W. E. B. Du Bois, Melville and Frances Herskovits, and Fernando Ortiz -- came into direct contact with Mexican social science. As other nations took inspiration from Mexico’s cultural brand of race, these Aguirre Beltrán and Covarrubias adopted the ethnographic theories and methods prevalent elsewhere used to recognize the presence of African cultural retentions, or Africanisms, in the Western Hemisphere. For the first time, ethnographic data and archival research about African slaves and their descendants from the United States, Cuba, and Brazil were relevant to Mexican history and ethnography.
Chapter 7 explains how African Americans and Mexicans, especially Gonzalo Aguirre Beltrán and Miguel Covarrubias, looking to make blackness socially visible, articulated two disparate definitions of what and who was authentically African-descended. With the nation’s African heritage outlined by 1946, ethnographers and cultural producers began to identify African-descended communities in the contemporary ethnographic landscape, thereby integrating the descendants of African slaves into the political debates about mestizaje, socioeconomic modernization, and social justice nationally and regionally. To render blackness socially visible, a Mexicanized variation of the black body, usually the racially and culturally mixed mulatto, emerged in the national imaginary and in specific locales in Veracruz and along the Costa Chica of Guerrero and Oaxaca. Conversely, among Black Nationalists in the United States, Mexico blossomed into an archeological, historical, and ethnographic site for the study of Afro-diasporic peoples and cultures. Concerned with the silencing of black cultural ingenuity and historical agency globally, they articulated a vision of racial identity oriented more toward a corporeal definition of the black body than the cultural constructions of social visibility expressed by Mexican social scientists and policy makers.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.