We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Haemodynamic changes in caval venous flow distribution occurring during bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis operation are still largely unknown.
Methods:
Transit time flow measurements were performed in 15 cavopulmonary anastomosis operations. Superior and inferior caval vein flows were measured before and after the cavopulmonary anastomosis. Ratio of superior caval vein to overall caval veins flow was calculated.
Results:
Mean superior caval vein flow ratio before cavopulmonary anastomosis was higher than previously reported for healthy children. Superior caval vein flow ratio decreased in 14/15 patients after cavopulmonary anastomosis: mean 0.63 ± 0.12 before versus 0.43 ± 0.14 after. No linear correlation between intraoperative superior caval vein pressure and superior caval vein flow after cavopulmonary anastomosis was found. Neither Nakata index nor pulmonary vascular resistance measured at preoperative cardiac catheterisation correlated with intraoperative flows. None of patients died or required a take down.
Conclusions:
The higher mean superior caval vein flow ratio before cavopulmonary anastomosis compared to healthy children suggests flow redistribution in univentricular physiology to protect brain and neurodevelopment. The decrease of superior caval vein flow ratio after cavopulmonary anastomosis may reflect the flow redistribution related to trans-pulmonary gradient. The lack of correlation between superior caval vein pressure and superior caval vein flow could be explained by limited sample size and multifactorial determinants of caval veins flow, although pressure remain essential. Larger sample of measurements are needed to find flow range potentially predictive for clinical failure. To authors’ knowledge, this is the first intraoperative flow measurement of both caval veins during cavopulmonary operations.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.