Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 2 - Secondary Affect in Lessing, Mendelssohn, and Nicolai

  • from I - Origins
  • Edited by Alex Houen, University of Cambridge
  • Book:
    Affect and Literature
    Published online:
    16 January 2020
    Print publication:
    06 February 2020, pp 49-65

  • Summary

    Recent affect theory has been wary of aesthetics. Critics challenge both the primacy of art in contrast with the lived complexities of affect and their philosophical subsumption under cognitive and moral interests. This synoptic ideology critique depicts aesthetics, from Leibnizian rationalism through the Kantian architecture, as a promise that discursively betrayed the sphere of affect even while restoring it to post-Cartesian attention. The charge truncates, however, the divergent and attentive questioning of affect that played out within the European field of eighteenth-century aesthetics. My argument moves backwards through the Kantian construction of aesthetic judgement to pursue one such exploratory line of questioning from Jean-Baptiste Dubos to Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, Friedrich Nicolai, and Moses Mendelssohn and, finally, Jean Paul. Dubos’ account of art as life-affirming animation was contentiously rethought in arguments about the secondary, or sympathetic, affects engendered by complex representations.