In this paper we study if and how persons with dementia are orally positioned by others, and how they position themselves while participating in assessment meetings held in order to discuss access to supportive services. We analysed five assessment meetings where two older persons (one diagnosed with dementia and one without a dementia diagnosis) participated to investigate whether the person with dementia is positioned differently than the other old person. Interactional phenomena used to position the person with dementia were identified by interactional analysis. We identified six phenomena that positioned the person with dementia as an individual with less interactional competence than the other participants: ignoring the person with dementia; voicing the feelings, capacity or opinion of the person with dementia; posing questions implying lack of competence; others' use of diagnosis; self-(re)positioning; and elderspeak. Persons with dementia are often orally positioned as less competent, indicating that they suffer further from discrimination than other older persons. We suggest that this has an impact on the participation of people with dementia in negotiations regarding their future care. The results indicate that social workers should be made aware that negative positioning exists and how it may affect the ability of people with dementia to contribute to discussions about their everyday life. Social workers should be encouraged to find strategies to reduce negative positioning in interaction.

Spousal caregivers are the most vulnerable of all caregivers to the stresses associated with the caregiving role, yet they are the least likely of all caregivers to utilize formal support services. This low use of services is poorly understood. To develop insight into this issue, this qualitative study explored how spousal caregivers made sense of the personal experience of living with a memory-impaired partner. The goal was to better understand the interface between this personal experience and the use of formal support services. Information was gathered through the use of unstructured interviews with 14 spouses, most of whom had turned down available formal support services. Analysis of their transcripts revealed the availability of four discourses, or story-lines, for framing the experience. These included two competing story-lines which were used to structure individuals' caring activities and two other competing story-lines which provided the framework for judging one's personal competence within the experience. This paper examines these four discourses and highlights how each influences the meaning associated with the use of formal support services. This analysis makes visible the multiple and sometimes contradictory meanings that service use may have for spouses caring for a memory-impaired partner.