Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 9 - Finding a New (Old?) Way Forward

  • from Part III - Pushing the Boundaries
  • Edited by Melanie Fink, Leiden University
  • Book:
    Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by the EU
    Print publication:
    12 December 2024, pp 227-244
    • Chapter
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Summary

    This chapter discusses possible avenues to access to justice outside the EU judicial system. More specifically, it assesses the possibility of using arbitration as a means to seek redress in situations where the EU has acted in violation of fundamental rights. Although this dispute settlement method exists outside the system of remedies within the EU, it has been an accepted form of dispute resolution in several instances by the Court of Justice of the European Union and EU institutions. The European Commission, for instance, relies on arbitration within EU competition law. Therefore, this chapter investigates into how much legal room exists for arbitration within the EU legal system and what drawbacks this could bring for the EU judicial system.