Background: The Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) is widely used for multidimensional evaluation of older people with mental health problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate reliability and validity of a Portuguese version of CANE.

Method: A cross-sectional multicenter study was designed using a convenience sample of elderly mental health services' users. CANE was compared with EASYCare, GHQ12, MMSE, Barthel Index and GDS15 to assess criterion and construct validity. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were also assessed.

Results: 79 patients (76% female), with mean age of 74 (± 6.6) years were included. Most patients lived at home with a family caregiver, generally female. Only 32% had no carer. Dementia was the commonest psychiatric diagnosis (61%) and somatic comorbidity was very prevalent (85%). Kappa values (κ) for inter-rater item reliability ranged from 0.72 to 1.00 (mean values: 0.96 patient, 0.93 carer, 0.90 staff). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for total scores ranged from 0.95 to 0.98.

For test-retest item reliability, the mean κ value was: 0.80 patient, 0.77 carer, 0.81 staff. ICC for total scores ranged from 0.82 to 0.92. Given the absence of a gold standard, criterion validity was assessed by comparing CANE with EASYCare (rs0.460; p ≤ 0.01), GDS (rs0.615; p ≤ 0.01), GHQ (rs0.581; p ≤ 0.01) and Barthel Index (rs-0.435; p ≤ 0.01). Overall, inter-item and item-total correlations for CANE and item comparison with other measures indicated reasonable construct validity.

Conclusion: The psychometric proprieties of CANE seem to be consistently good, in accordance with other studies. Robust results on ecological, face, content, criterion and construct validity, as well as good reliability, were achieved. This version is a promising tool for research and practical use in Portuguese old age settings.

Background: Tailor-made care in dementia requires an individual needs assessment. The Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) was developed to assess needs of older people with mental disorders. In this study the validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the CANE were studied among community-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal carers.

Method: Interviews were carried out with 236 people with mild to severe dementia and 322 informal carers; 69 informal carers were interviewed twice. Construct and criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the CANE were studied using data for informal carers. Construct validity was also studied for CANE ratings of people with dementia.

Results: The construct validity of the CANE was good among people with dementia and informal carers. Criterion validity could be studied for 76.9% of the CANE items, and all significant correlations were convergent. Test-retest reliability of the CANE varied from poor to very good and was best on domains where needs were explicit and problems well defined.

Conclusions: Use of the Dutch version of the CANE among community-dwelling people with dementia and their carers is supported by the study results, with the study showing acceptable construct and criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the CANE.

Background: People with dementia in care homes are at risk of having their views ignored and decisions are often made on their behalf by care home staff and family carers. The aim of this study was to compare the ratings of needs of older people with dementia living in care homes, as assessed by the older person themselves, a family caregiver, and the staff of the care home.

Method: The Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) was completed for 238 residents with dementia by care staff. In addition, 149 users and 81 family caregivers also completed the assessment of the person's met and unmet needs.

Results: Many users were able to report their met and unmet needs despite having moderately severe dementia. The views of the person with dementia were commonly in agreement with the staff and family carers' views. However, user and carer pairs had the lowest average percentage agreement of 63% compared to that of 77% between user and staff pairs. In particular, users reported relatively higher unmet needs for psychological distress, company and information, and high unmet needs for daytime activities and eyesight/hearing problems.

Conclusions: Users' views on their needs should be sought even when the person has dementia and lives in a care home. Reliance solely on assessment by staff or carers may lead to under recognition of unmet needs.

This article describes the met and ummet needs of elderly residents of nursing care (NC) and residential care (RC) settings. Thirty-four residents of an RC home and 40 residents of two NC settings were assessed. Each resident and a respective staff member were interviewed using the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) to indicate the resident's current met and unmet needs. The Clifton Assessment Procedure for the Elderly–Behaviour Rating Scale (CAPE-BRS) was completed by the staff member to indicate the participant's current level of dependency. In addition, the Mini-Mental State Examination was administered to participants and DSM-IV diagnosis was recorded. A high number of needs were found in both RC and NC settings, the level of dependency being proportional to level of need. There was a core set of needs in both samples related to difficulties with accommodation, food preparation, and self-care. Both NC and RC homes were meeting these needs; however, RC residents had a significantly greater level of unmet need for suitable daytime activities. The greatest predictor of type of setting was gender and there were significantly more females in RC. Controlling for gender, participants in NC had greater levels of dependency, particularly problems with apathy and social skills, as measured on the CAPE-BRS. It is possible that the greater level of social needs in NC residents had led to their placement in the more specialized NC settings. On the other hand, NC settings may be left caring for a group of residents that, because of their specific needs, have been difficult to place into RC. These findings have clinical implications for the future development of continuing care for the elderly. This study also highlighted that there is a substantial need for specialist services to address the unmet needs in these two types of continuing-care settings, such as interventions for social disturbances in NC and suitable daytime activities in RC. The CANE is a useful instrument to evaluate such needs in long-term-care settings.