Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 6 - Mutual Help Approaches and Mechanisms of Change

  • from Part I - Micro Level
  • Edited by Jalie A. Tucker, University of Florida, Katie Witkiewitz, University of New Mexico
  • Book:
    Dynamic Pathways to Recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder
    Published online:
    23 December 2021
    Print publication:
    06 January 2022, pp 95-113

  • Summary

    Mutual help programs are popular resources for persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and clinical referral to such programs is common. This chapter describes what is currently known about four established mutual help programs in the United States: Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), SMART Recovery, Women for Sobriety (WFS), and LifeRing. Strong correlational research indicates that AA is associated with increased abstinence and that this association arises in part because of increased social support, abstinence self-efficacy, and spiritual practices. There is little support that reductions in anger, selfishness, and depression account for AA-related benefit. Preliminary evidence indicates that persons reporting lower religiosity and higher education are more likely to affiliate with non-AA mutual help programs and that these programs may be efficacious. A series of recommendations are made to advance our knowledge of these mutual help programs, with an emphasis on the need for future investigations of SMART, WFS, and LifeRing.