We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter provides a critical history of international environmental law. It suggests that the ideologies at the heart of international law and international environmental law projects cannot protect the environment. First, the chapter considers the influence of classical liberalism on the conception of nature in international law prior to World War II, especially in the context of fisheries. Then, the chapter turns to emerging environmental issues after World War II, when international law was concerned with marine pollution. During this period, international law took a welfarist approach to environmental problems, but with no substantial change to a liberalist conception of nature. Thereafter, international environmental law as a distinct branch emerged in the 1970s. This new branch remains rooted in liberal principles, but is also influenced by neoliberalism, as reflected in its general principles and marketised approach to problems such as climate change and biodiversity protection. As international environmental law has failed to provide solutions to the problems for which it was enacted, the conclusion calls for an ideological rethinking of founding principles.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.