We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In this chapter, the analysis focusses on a very specific instance of political and legal heterogeneity, with reference to the northern town of Angoche in the newly independent Mozambique. It will show that the heterogeneous state and legal pluralism underwent a significant transformation when the central governing political force (the Frelimo party) was confronted in democratic elections with another, rival political force (Renamo). Even after a multiparty system had been introduced in 1990, the authoritarian political structures that dominated the country in the first period of independence in Mozambique under the one-party system (from 1975 to 1990) still prevailed in central government policies for local authorities. The result of this disjuncture at municipal level and its potential political implications is the object of analysis in this chapter. In the first period of independence, interrupting the state and the law meant a radical and wholesale refusal of the colonial political and legal structures. The assumption was that colonialism had absorbed, cannibalised or disfigured the entire political and legal experience in the colony. The envisaged transformation would be brought about by a top-down, vanguardist, authoritarian process. This experience showed that both the nature and the scale of the planned state and legal transformation were misconceived and were subsequently reformulated as a result of internal conflicts and external pressures.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.