Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:18:42.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High primary productivity in an Ediacaran shallow marine basin influenced by strong seasonal to perennial upwelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2023

A.H. Ansari
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226007, India
S.K. Pandey*
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226007, India
Shamim Ahmad
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226007, India
Mukund Sharma
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226007, India
Pawan Govil
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226007, India
Amritpal Singh Chaddha
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226007, India
Anupam Sharma
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226007, India
*
Corresponding author: S.K. Pandey; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A significant area of late Neoproterozoic–early Cambrian seafloor hosted a ferruginous to euxinic condition as a result of expanded primary productivity-driven pumping of organic matter into subsurface water column and weak water column mixing in the concomitant sea. However, the cause and extent of increased marine primary productivity during this time interval remain unknown. To estimate the primary productivity in a late Neoproterozoic sea, this study investigated the Sirbu Shale, Vindhyan Supergroup, for trace elements, organic carbon isotopes and total organic carbon (TOC). Among the trace elements, cadmium (Cd), known for extremely low concentration in crustal rocks but higher abundance in biogenic organic matter, was the key parameter in the palaeoproductivity estimation. The Cd enrichment in the Sirbu Shale samples is comparable to that in modern marine sediments of the oxygen minimum zones in Chilean margins, Arabian Sea and Gulf of California characterized by high primary productivity and seasonal upwelling. In terms of Cd enrichment, the lower section of the Sirbu Shale was deposited under suboxic conditions, while the upper section was deposited under a relatively less reducing condition. Cd/Mo ratios > 0.36 in the shale sample indicate that the palaeoproductivity was strongly influenced by the nutrient supply through sea-shelf upwelling. Using non-detrital enrichment of Cd in Sirbu Shale samples, we calculated that the TOC exported to the floor of Sirbu Shale palaeodepositional setting through primary productivity ranged from 0.71 to 10.16%.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

The rapid evolution of the Ediacaran biota and subsequent explosion and diversification of animals in the Ediacaran-early Cambrian is thought to have been driven by one of the most significant oxygenation events of the earth’s history, commonly known as the Neoproterozoic Oxidation Event (NOE) (Xiao & Laflamme, Reference Xiao and Laflamme2009; Erwin et al. Reference Erwin, Laflamme, Tweedt, Sperling, Pisani and Peterson2011; Knoll, Reference Knoll2011; Lenton et al. Reference Lenton, Boyle, Poulton, Shields-Zhou and Butterfield2014). During the NOE, atmospheric oxygen concentration reached above 40% of the present atmospheric level and probably, for the first time, oxidized the deep oceanic floor (Canfield et al. Reference Canfield, Poulton and Narbonne2007; Sahoo et al. Reference Sahoo, Planavsky, Kendall, Wang, Shi, Scott, Anbar, Lyons and Jiang2012). This rise in oxygen level would have assisted the animal evolution, by developing more efficient metabolic machinery (Jiang et al. Reference Jiang, Kong, Qin, Li, Caetano-Anolles and Zhang2012), increasing the bioavailability of critical trace metals (Anbar & Knoll, Reference Anbar and Knoll2002) and macronutrients. However, more recent studies have suggested that deep-water oxygenations between NOE and early Cambrian were transient, and deep-water column stayed anoxic to ferruginous for most of this interval, probably due to high surface primary productivity and associated dissolved oxygen consumption during organic matter remineralization (Li et al. Reference Li, Planavsky, Shi, Zhang, Zhou, Cheng, Tarhan, Luo and Xie2015; Sahoo et al. Reference Sahoo, Planavsky, Jiang, Kendall, Owens, Wang, Shi, Anbar and Lyons2016; Jin et al. Reference Jin, Li, Algeo, Planavsky, Cui, Yang, Zhao, Zhang and Xie2016; Sperling et al. Reference Sperling, Knoll and Girguis2015). This theory of a drastic increase in primary productivity is supported by the rise in the abundance of phosphorites and phosphorus content in the geological records (Reinhard et al. Reference Reinhard, Planavsky, Gill, Ozaki, Robbins, Lyons, Fischer, Wang, Cole and Konhauser2017). However, for this period, oceanic primary productivity and its control (e.g., nutrient supply from terrestrial weathering or/and upwelling) remain poorly constrained (Xiang et al. Reference Xiang, Schoepfer, Zhang, Cao and Shen2018).

Redox shifts in oceanic bottom waters and sedimentary pore waters are often coupled with the change of the biological pump strength, a process through which inorganic dissolved carbon is fixed as organic matter by phytoplankton in the upper oceanic water column and subsequently exported to the deep ocean (Meyer et al. Reference Meyer, Ridgwell and Payne2016). During this exportation, a significant fraction of organic matter is remineralized back to CO2 by heterotrophs first consuming dissolved oxygen and thereafter other oxidants such as nitrate, manganese, iron and sulphate (Wyrtki, Reference Wyrtki1962). Thus, the degree of oxygen removal from the water column largely depends upon the strength of the biological pump or organic matter transfer into the water column. This process of dissolved oxygen removal from the water column directly/indirectly plays a key role in the accumulation of redox-sensitive trace elements (RSTEs) in underlying sediments. It makes some of the biologically important RSTEs (Cd, Zn, Mo) a suitable proxy for understanding past export production (Wagner et al. Reference Wagner, Hendy, McKay and Pedersen2013). Nevertheless, it is important to note that the remobilization of RSTEs during diagenetic processes can alter the sediment composition, rendering it challenging to use RSTEs for export production estimation. Besides, most of the available Proterozoic geological records are of shallow depositional origin that could have received detrital inputs from local specific mineral assemblages enriched or depleted in specific trace metals. This risk is minimal for elements that are low in crustal rocks but highly incorporated in biogenic particles (Brumsack, Reference Brumsack2006). Cadmium (Cd) is one such RSTEs, the crustal abundance of which is very low but extensively accumulated in marine phytoplankton biomass (Rosenthal et al. Reference Rosenthal, Lam, Boyle and Thomson1995; Ho et al. Reference Ho, Quigg, Finkel, Milligan, Wyman, Falkowski and Morel2003; Morel & Malcolm, 2005; Böning et al. Reference Böning, Cuypers, Grunwald, Schnetger and Brumsack2005; Twining & Baines, Reference Twining and Baines2013; Bryan et al. Reference Bryan, Dickson, Dowdall, Homoky, Porcelli and Henderson2021). For example, Cd concentration in marine phytoplankton can reach up to more than two orders of magnitude compared to crustal abundance (Brumsack, Reference Brumsack2006; Wagner et al. Reference Wagner, Hendy, McKay and Pedersen2013).

Cadmium in the marine water column exhibits a nutrient-like profile, especially similar to dissolved inorganic phosphate, and it is effectively utilized by phytoplankton in the upper water column and released in the deeper water column during organic matter remineralization (Boyle et al. Reference Boyle, Sclater and Edmond1976; Cullen, Reference Cullen2006; Hendry et al. Reference Hendry, Rickaby, de Hoog, Weston and Rehkämper2008). Though the role of phosphate as a bio-essential nutrient is well known, the role of Cd is still not properly understood. A few studies have reported Cd-based carbonic anhydrase enzyme, which plays a role in converting bicarbonate to carbon dioxide in photosynthetic CO2 fixation (Lane et al. Reference Lane, Saito, George, Pickering, Prince and Morel2005; Xu et al. Reference Xu, Feng, Jeffrey, Shi and Morel2008). Furthermore, Cd assimilation in certain phytoplankton is higher under Zn/Fe-limited oceanic conditions (Cullen, Reference Cullen2006; Löscher et al. Reference Löscher, De Jong and De Baar1998; Price & Morel, Reference Price and Morel1990). The remarkable similarity of Cd distribution with the inorganic phosphate and organic carbon in modern Oceans has been proven useful in effectively reconstructing the palaeonutrient and palaeoproductivity from Cd concentration in clastic sediments (Brumsack, Reference Brumsack2006; Wagner et al. Reference Wagner, Hendy, McKay and Pedersen2013). More recently, novel Cd isotope studies on the Mesoproterozoic (Viehmann et al. Reference Viehmann, Hohl, Kraemer, Bau, Walde, Galer, Jiang and Meister2019), Neoproterozoic to Cambrian (Hohl et al. Reference Hohl, Galer, Gamper and Becker2017, Reference Hohl, Jiang, Wei, Pi, Liu, Viehmann and Galer2019, Reference Hohl, Jiang, Viehmann, Wei, Liu, Wei and Galer2020; John et al. Reference John, Kunzmann, Townsend and Rosenberg2017) and Permian (Georgiev et al. Reference Georgiev, Horner, Stein, Hannah, Bingen and Rehkämper2015) sedimentary rock records demonstrated that Cd is closely associated with biogenic organic matter and sulphide. Thus, to develop a better understanding of the late Neoproterozoic palaeoproductivity and their controlling factors, this study investigated a section of the Ediacaran Sirbu Shale of the Vindhyan Supergroup, India, for trace elements and organic carbon isotopes analysis with special emphasis on the use of authigenic Cd as a palaeoproductivity proxy.

2. Geological background and age

The Vindhyan Supergroup (VSG) is one of the largest well-exposed intracratonic basins (Figure 1), occupying an area of about 1,66,400 km2 in central and western India, with 40,000 km2 under the subsurface profile of Deccan Trap and approximately 10,000 km2 under the Gangetic alluvium (Srivastava et al. Reference Srivastava, Rana, Verma, Bhandari, Venkatachala, Kumar, Swamy, Garga and Srivastava1983; Mathur, Reference Mathur1987; Jokhan Ram et al. Reference Jokhan Ram, Pramanik, Verma, Chandra and Murthy1996; Sharma et al. Reference Sharma, Pandey and Kumar2020). In terms of thickness, age and depositional environment, the VSG is coeval to the other Proterozoic cratonic basins found in other parts of the world, such as America, Siberia, China and Australia (Preiss & Forbes, Reference Preiss and Forbes1981; Deb, Reference Deb2004; Wani & Mondal, Reference Wani and Mondal2011; Mahon et al. Reference Mahon, Dehler, Link, Karlstrom and Gehrels2014; Rogov et al. Reference Rogov, Karlova, Marusin, Kochnev, Nagovitsin and Grazhdankin2015; Cawood et al. Reference Cawood, Zhao, Yao, Wang, Xu and Wang2018; Rooney et al. 2018; Gladkochub et al. Reference Gladkochub, Donskaya, Stanevich, Pisarevsky, Zhang, Motova, Mazukabzov and Li2019). The basin unconformably rests on the top of the Bundelkhand massif (in the west and central parts) and the Bijawar Group of rocks (in the eastern part), which has been considerably metamorphosed (Crawford & Compston, Reference Crawford and Compston1969; Mondal et al. Reference Mondal, Goswami, Deomurari and Sharma2002). VSG is constituted of largely unmetamorphosed/undeformed rocks (Soni et al. Reference Soni, Chakraborty and Jain1987) and is exposed in two geographical locations: in central India (known as the Son Valley) and in western India (known as the Chambal Valley). The maximum cumulative thickness of the basin is around 5000 metres, composed of mainly sandstone, shale, limestone and, to a lesser extent, mudstone, siltstone, porcellanite and ash beds (Bhattacharyya, Reference Bhattacharyya1993, Reference Bhattacharyya1996). It is broadly divided into lower and upper Vindhyans. The entire succession is lithostratigraphically divided into four groups, viz. the Semri, the Kaimur, the Rewa and the Bhander, in ascending order (Table 1). The Bhander Group, the youngest unit (Krishnan, Reference Krishnan1968; Sastry & Moitra, Reference Sastry and Moitra1984), is composed of shale-carbonate-shale-sandstone litho-package and subdivided into four formations: the Ganurgarh Shale, the Bhander Limestone, the Sirbu Shale and the Maihar Sandstone (Table 1).

Fig. 1. Geological map of the Vindhyan Basin (after Krishnan & Swaminath, Reference Krishnan and Swaminath1959) in and around Maihar area, Satna district. Star represents the sampling location of the Dudhiya Nala, North of Sharda Devi Temple, Maihar township.

Table 1. Lithostratigraphy of the Vindhyan Supergroup (modified after Sastry & Moitra, Reference Sastry and Moitra1984; Kumar & Sharma, Reference Kumar and Sharma2012; Sharma et al. Reference Sharma, Pandey and Kumar2020)

The Ganurgarh Shale is an older unit of the Bhander Group characterized by maroon colour fine-grained calcareous silty shale. A few outcrop exposures are available around Rewa and Maihar area, Madhya Pradesh. The presence of salt pseudomorph and gypsum suggests that the Ganurgarh Shale was deposited in the upper intertidal to supratidal depositional setting (Singh, Reference Singh1976; Sarkar et al. Reference Sarkar, Chakraborty, Banerjee, Bose, Alterman and Corcoran2002). The overlying unit, the Bhander Limestone, is exposed in the low-lying areas or mine or quarry sections in the Satna district. It is composed of dark grey-coloured carbonate with subordinate green to buff-coloured shale. Stromatolites are preserved as bioherms and biostromes in the Satna-Maihar area (Kumar, Reference Kumar1976a, b; Misra and Kumar, Reference Misra and Kumar2005, Pandey, Reference Pandey2012). Flaser and lenticular bedding, intraformational conglomerate, small-scale-cross bedding, fractured microbial layers, ripples and mud cracks are some of the sedimentary structures profusely developed within the carbonate units. The lowest part of this carbonate unit was deposited in moderate energy, subtidal to lower intertidal depositional setting. In contrast, the middle to upper part was deposited in an intertidal to supratidal depositional setting (Singh, Reference Singh1976).

The Sirbu Shale is well exposed in hillock sections in and around the Maihar area with overlying Maihar Sandstone and underlying Bhander Limestone (Figure 1, 2) and composed of light yellow-buff, grey to greyish green shale and siltstone interbedded with grey to brownish grey mudstone siltstone and sandstone suitable facies for fossil preservation. The estimated thickness of the Sirbu Shale is 100–250 m (Sastry & Moitra, Reference Sastry and Moitra1984). Based on the sedimentological variations, Singh (Reference Singh1976) divided it into three litho-units: litho-unit A, B and C in ascending order and inferred to be deposited in a lagoon with oxidizing milieu, hypersaline and storm-dominated palaeoenvironment. Sarkar et al. (Reference Sarkar, Chakraborty, Banerjee, Bose, Alterman and Corcoran2002) inferred it to be deposited in storm-dominated shelf and lagoonal palaeoenvironment. A recent study by Singh and Chakraborty (Reference Singh and Chakraborty2022) suggested that the Sirbu Shale is deposited within the storm-dominated outer to inner shelf towards the top based on the physical evidence. In the present study, the classification given by Singh (Reference Singh1976) is being followed for the ease of understanding the different litho-units. Litho-unit A is composed of dark brown to maroon-coloured sand-siltstone with occasional layers of green-coloured shale. Various types of shallow water ripple marks are well exposed, along with intermittent sub-areal exposure. It was deposited in the protected mudflat to the lagoonal hypersaline environment as indicated by the presence of salt-pseudomorphs. It is not exposed in the studied section of Dudhiya nala. Litho-unit B is characterized by the papery thin green, dark grey to black coloured shale (Figure 2(a), (c)) with intercalations of centimetric thin sandy layers (Figure 2(a), (c)) at about 1-metre intervals. Fresh cuttings are typically dark grey in colour, but when exposed to light, they turn brown. Gutter cast, hummocky cross-stratification and load cast are common sedimentary structures between the shaley layers of this unit, suggesting storm-dominated events within the depositional realm (Figure 2(a), (d)). Thus, this unit is inferred to be deposited above the storm wave base or in storm-dominated shelf palaeoenvironment (Singh, Reference Singh1976; Sarkar et al. Reference Sarkar, Chakraborty, Banerjee, Bose, Alterman and Corcoran2002). Litho-unit C comprises decimetre thick sandy layers interbedded with reddish-brown shale, but in fresh cut, light green in the middle and light grey at the top (Figure 2(a), (e), (f)).

Fig. 2. (a) Detailed litholog of the Sirbu Shale exposed in Dudhiya Nala Section; (b) Dudhiya Nala section, where thin layers of black to grey-coloured shale/mudstone/sandy unit of the Sirbu Shale is exposed (see yellow arrow); (c) Litho-unit B of the Sirbu Shale: papery thin green, dark grey to black coloured shale with intercalations of centimetric thin sandy layers; (d) lensoid sandy gutter cast (yellow dotted line) indicates small events of storms within Litho-unit B; (e), (f) partly sandy and light grey to green colour shale in the middle and buff colour at the top.

Both the litho-units B and C are quite different in terms of grain texture, lithology, colour and deposition environment. Litho-unit B is papery thin with the lower part dark grey to grey and the upper part light green in colour. Litho-unit C is light grey in the lower part and light grey at the top (Figure 2(f)) composed of coarse and thickly bedded shale with intercalation of centimetre size sandy layer (Sarkar et al. Reference Sarkar, Chakraborty, Banerjee, Bose, Alterman and Corcoran2002). The litho-unit B is dominated by the gutter cast, whereas in litho-unit C, its presence is rare. The change from litho-unit B to C symbolises a shift in depositional setting from a relatively deeper shelf to a relatively shallower shelf environment (Sarkar et al. Reference Sarkar, Chakraborty, Banerjee, Bose, Alterman and Corcoran2002).

The Maihar Sandstone, characterized by heterolithic stratification of sandstone and siltstone, has a gradational contact with the underlying Sirbu Shale and is best exposed in Maihar township. Cross stratifications, flaser, lenticular bedding, desiccation cracks, penecontemporaneous deformational structures, wave, current ripples and many other sedimentary structures are well preserved within the Maihar Sandstone. The Maihar Sandstone is deposited in the tidal flat–shoal complex depositional environment (Singh, Reference Singh1976).

The Ganurgarh Shale represents the base of the Bhander Group. Prasad et al. (Reference Prasad, Uniyal and Asher2005) and Prasad (Reference Prasad2007) recovered organic-walled microfossil assemblages from subsurface profile (core) and outcrop sections and suggested the late Cryogenian to early Vendian age. From the overlying Bhander Limestone, Kumar (Reference Kumar1999) reported sponge spicule-like structure, and Singh et al. (Reference Singh, Babu and Shukla2011) and Pandey & Kumar (Reference Pandey and Kumar2013) reported microfossils assemblage from the associated black bedded chert and suggested Ediacaran age. Columnar stromatolites and carbonaceous megafossils were reported from the Bhander Limestone (Valdiya, Reference Valdiya1969; Kumar, Reference Kumar1976a, b; Kumar & Srivastava, Reference Kumar and Srivastava1997, Reference Kumar and Srivastava2003; Misra & Kumar, Reference Misra and Kumar2005; Singh et al. Reference Singh, Babu and Shukla2009; Sharma et al. Reference Sharma, Mishra, Dutta, Banerjee and Shukla2009, Pandey, Reference Pandey2012). Pandey et al. (Reference Pandey, Singh, Sharma, Ahmad and Bhan2023b) described large-sized Ediacaran Vase-shaped microfossils (VSMs) from the Bhander Limestone. The Bhander Limestone is overlain by the Sirbu Shale, from where Kumar & Srivastava (Reference Kumar and Srivastava2003) have described Chuaria-Tawuia and other carbonaceous assemblage and suggested the upper Riphean and Vendian age of the Bhander Group. A variety of the Ediacaran-type megafossils were reported from the different shale units of the Sirbu Shale (De, Reference De2003, Reference De2006, Reference De2009), yet their biogenicity is not proven. Recently, Pandey et al. (Reference Pandey, Singh, Sharma, Ahmad and Bhan2023b) described Ediacaran ‘Late Ediacaran Leiosphere Palynoflora’ (LELP) assemblage and other associated organic-walled microfossils from the Sirbu Shale. The Ediacaran fossils, such as Arumberia banksi (Vendobionta), A. vindhyanensis, Rameshia rampurensis, Beltaneliformis minuta, Dickinsonia tenuis (?) and Charniodiscus-like Ediacaran megafossil have been reported and discussed from the Maihar Sandstone and considered to be deposited within the late Ediacaran Period (Kumar & Pandey, Reference Kumar and Pandey2008, Pandey, Reference Pandey2012; Retallack et al. Reference Retallack, Matthews, Master, Khangar and Khan2021; Pandey et al. Reference Pandey, Singh, Sharma, Ahmad and Bhan2023b). However, Dickinsonia tenuis has been challenged by Pandey et al. (Reference Pandey, Ahmad and Sharma2023a) and Meert et al. (Reference Meert, Pandit, Kwafo and Singha2023) and proven to be a pseudofossil.

Stable carbon isotope studies on the Bhander Limestone and carbonate lenses of the Sirbu Shale suggested a probable Precambrian-Cambrian boundary between the Bhander Limestone and the Sirbu Shale (Friedman et al. Reference Friedman, Chakraborty and Kolkas1996; Friedman & Chakraborty, Reference Friedman and Chakraborty1997) though only few samples have been analyzed. Stable carbon and strontium isotope analyses of the Bhander Limestone by Ray et al. (Reference Ray, Martin, Veizer and Bowring2002, 2003); Kumar et al. (2002); and Kumar et al. (2005) suggested Tonian to Cryogenian (∼750-650 Ma) age. Rathore et al. (Reference Rathore, Vijan, Krishna, Prabhu and Mishra1999) dated glauconites occurring in the lowest part of the Sirbu Shale by the K-Ar method and gave 741 ± 9 Ma age for deposition of the Sirbu Shale. Recently, Lan et al. (Reference Lan, Zhang, Li, Pandey, Sharma, Shukla, Ahmad, Sarkar and Zhai2020) dated the topmost unit of the Maihar Sandstone by the U-Pb method, and based on the youngest zircon dataset, the maximum depositional age was estimated as 548 Ma. Lan et al. (Reference Lan, Zhang, Li, Pandey, Sharma, Shukla, Ahmad, Sarkar and Zhai2020) dataset matches the overall fossil assemblage recovered from the Maihar Sandstone. Recent and previous reports of the Ediacaran elements (fossils and radiometric ages) from the Maihar Sandstone (Kumar & Pandey, Reference Kumar and Pandey2008; McKenzie et al. Reference McKenzie, Hughes, Myrow, Xiao and Sharma2011; Lan et al. Reference Lan, Zhang, Li, Pandey, Sharma, Shukla, Ahmad, Sarkar and Zhai2020; Retallack et al. Reference Retallack, Matthews, Master, Khangar and Khan2021; Pandey et al. Reference Pandey, Singh, Sharma, Ahmad and Bhan2023b) stress the plausible Ediacaran age of the Sirbu Shale.

3. Materials and methods

This study was performed on the uppermost succession of litho-units B and C, which is best exposed (about 16 m) in the Dudhiya Nala section, North of Sharda Devi temple on Maihar to Rampur Road (Figure 2(a), (b)). For the geochemical investigation, 48 samples were systematically collected (24º16’32.00” N; 80º43’10.00” E) (Figure 1, 2). Each sample’s surface was discarded, and the remainder part was washed thrice with Milli-Q water and dried at 60°C in the oven. Samples were powdered for the geochemical analysis. Entire preprocessing was performed at the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences (BSIP), Lucknow.

Thirty mg powder of each sample was digested in the two-step process for trace element analyses (Xiong et al. Reference Xiong, Li, Algeo, Chang, Yin and Xu2012; Ansari et al. Reference Ansari, Ahmad, Govil, Agrawal and Mathews2020, Reference Ansari, Singh, Sharma and Kumar2022). In the first step, the powdered sample was transferred into a Teflon tube and added with a 5 mL mixture of hydrofluoric and nitric acid in a 2:1 ratio followed by 1 mL perchloric acid. Subsequently, the tube was tightly closed with a cap and heated at 120°C for 7 hours in a Q-block operating system. Later, the Teflon tube was opened to allow the evaporation until it dried completely. In the second step, a 5 mL mixture of hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid in a 1:2 ratio followed by 1 mL of perchloric acid was added into the Teflon tube, then heated and dried as in the first step. After the second step, 2 mL of 5% HNO3 was added, and the clarity of the solution was checked. If any part of the powdered sample was still left, the two-step process was repeated until complete digestion. The digested sample was diluted in 2% HNO3 to a final volume of 50 mL and kept at 4°C before analysis. Similarly, the digested liquid was prepared from United States Geological Survey (USGS) standard rock powders of Cody Shale (SCo-1), Green River Shale (SGR-1b), and blanks. Repeats of some samples were run for quality control. The analytical error was less than 5%.

The δ13C-org and TOC analysis was carried out following the method described by Ansari et al. (Reference Ansari, Pandey, Sharma, Agrawal and Kumar2018). The powdered sample was first treated with 5% HCl to remove traces of carbonates. The treated sample was washed with Milli-Q water and then dried at 60°C in the oven. The dried sample was again crushed to powder, weighted and enclosed in a tin capsule, which was inserted into a prefilled, conditioned reactor of the Elemental Analyser (Flash EA 2000 HT) by the integrated autosampler. For isotopic analysis, the CO2 released from the combustion of the sample in EA was transferred to the Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (IRMS MAT 253) coupled with the Con-Flow IV interface. To check the accuracy of isotopic measurements, international standards: IAEA-CH3 and IAEA-CH6, internal standards: Sulfanilamide and a few repeat samples were repeatedly analyzed at the interval of ten samples. TOC was measured from the peak area of CO2 chromatogram from mass spectrometer (Agrawal et al. Reference Agrawal, Srivastava, Sonam Meena, Rai, Bhushan, Misra and Gupta2015).

For quantitative elemental analyses, a wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (WD-XRF) Spectrometer (Model: PANalytical, axios max, 4 KW) was used. Samples were ground into powder using an agate mortar and pestle (up to around 300 mesh of ASTM standard). The powdered specimens were then moulded into pressed pellets in a ratio of 6:4 (sample: binder) using boric acid as a binder, following the method described by Takahashi (Reference Takahashi2015). The individual samples were examined using the international standards and a Super Q application with an accuracy of ≤5%. All these analyses were performed at the Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facilities (SAIF) of the BSIP. Repeat analyses showed a precision of ±0.1%. Loss on ignition (LOI), which reflects the volatile content in the samples, was measured by heating the 5 g of the sample at 950°C for 6 hours in a muffle furnace and subtracting the final weight of the sample from 5 g (weight before heating).

3.1. Calculation of enrichment factors for elements

To understand the relative enrichments of trace elements in the bulk samples of Sirbu Shale against the average composition of upper continental crust (UCC) (Rudnick & Gao, Reference Rudnick, Gao and Rudnick2003), the enrichment factor (EF) for trace element is calculated using following Eq. 1.

(1) $$\rm{{X_{EF}} = {\rm{ }}{\left( {X/Al} \right)_{sample}}/{\left( {X/Al} \right)_{UCC}}}$$

X and EF in Eq.1 represent trace element and enrichment factors, respectively. ‘Al’ represents element aluminium. (X/Al)Sample and (X/Al)UCC denote the ratio in the bulk samples of Sirbu Shale and the ratio for the average composition of UCC. Al in Eq. 1-4 is used as a tracer for calculating the detrital fraction of trace elements. An example of enrichment factor calculation is provided in the Supplementary Material (after supplementary Table 2).

3.2. Calculation of TOCbm and TOCloss

Studies of the Cd content in surface marine sediments and phytoplankton of modern ocean (Rosenthal et al. Reference Rosenthal, Lam, Boyle and Thomson1995; Ho et al. Reference Ho, Quigg, Finkel, Milligan, Wyman, Falkowski and Morel2003; Morel & Malcolm et al. 2005; Böning et al. Reference Böning, Cuypers, Grunwald, Schnetger and Brumsack2005; Twining & Baines, Reference Twining and Baines2013; Bryan et al. Reference Bryan, Dickson, Dowdall, Homoky, Porcelli and Henderson2021) have demonstrated that Cd is strongly correlated with organic content and 1% of TOC generally contributes 0.186 to 0.372 μg of biogenic (non-detrital) Cd in modern marine sediments. This quantitative relation between TOC and non-detrital Cd thus can be used in estimating the possible range of TOC content in marine sediment records. Assuming that the quantitative transfer of non-detrital Cd to sediments in non-euxinic set-up of ancient ocean was also mainly driven by organic matter transport and in the similar ratio as in the modern ocean, we propose an equation (Eq.4) for the tentative estimation of total organic carbon originally exported to the concomitant sediment [i.e., TOC content in sediment before remineralization (TOCbm) by early diagenetic activities] of ancient marine set-up.

(2) $$\rm{C{d_{non - detrital}} = {\rm{ }}C{d_{sample}}-{\rm{ }}C{d_{detrital}}}$$
(3) $$\rm{C{d_{detrital}} = {\rm{ }}\left( {C{d_{UCC}}/A{l_{UCC}}} \right)^*A{l_{sample}}}$$
(4) $$\rm{TO{C_{bm}}\left( \% \right){\rm{ }} = {\rm{ }}\left[ {C{d_{sample}} - {\rm{ }}\left( {C{d_{UCC}}/A{l_{UCC}}} \right)^*A{l_{sample}}} \right]/CF}$$

In Eq. 4, CF is a conversion factor representing the quantitative relation between TOC and non-detrital Cd contributed in modern marine sediments that range from 0.186 to 0.372 (Rosenthal et al. Reference Rosenthal, Lam, Boyle and Thomson1995; Ho et al. Reference Ho, Quigg, Finkel, Milligan, Wyman, Falkowski and Morel2003; Morel & Malcolm et al. 2005; Böning et al. Reference Böning, Cuypers, Grunwald, Schnetger and Brumsack2005; Twining & Baines, Reference Twining and Baines2013; Bryan et al. Reference Bryan, Dickson, Dowdall, Homoky, Porcelli and Henderson2021). TOCbm denotes the estimated gross organic matter export, i.e., TOC before loss through remineralization at the sediment-water interface or during early diagenesis. The remineralization loss of organic carbon (TOCloss) is calculated by subtracting the TOC measured in the bulk sample from TOCbm calculated for the respective sample (see Eq. 5).

(5) $$\rm{TO{C_{loss}}\left( \% \right){\rm{ }} = {\rm{ }}TO{C_{bm}}-{\rm{ }}TOC{\rm{ }}\left( {bulk} \right)}$$

4. Results

A total of 48 shale samples collected from the Sirbu Shale were analyzed for trace metals, TOC, and bulk organic carbon isotope. However, 46 samples were analyzed for the major oxides and LOI as two samples (BH-29 and BH-35) were completely consumed and were unavailable for these analyses. Data have been provided in Tables 2a and 3, and supplementary Tables 1, 2 and 3. The correlation matrix among the enrichment factors of trace elements, total phosphorus (P) enrichment, Al, TOC, δ¹3C-organic, and LOI are given in Table 2b. The results show that only Cd is significantly enriched in the samples. The calculated enrichment factor using Eq.1 against the UCC values (Rudnick & Gao, Reference Rudnick, Gao and Rudnick2003) for Cd in the litho-unit B (BH-1 to BH-24) varies between 7.1 and 28.5, and in the litho-unit C (BH-25 to BH-48) varies between 4.7 and 8.5 (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 2). Enrichment of total P in litho-unit B varies between 1.6 and 3.2, and in the litho-unit C varies between 1.4 and 2.2. V and Cr enrichment factors in the sampled stratigraphic section show no significant change and stay consistent < 1 (Figure 3). Enrichment factor for Co and Mo in the litho-unit C and upper part of the litho-unit B does not show major changes and value mostly falls close to one, but the lower part of litho-unit B shows relatively significant enrichment (2–3 times) compared to UCC (Figure 3). Enrichment factor for U in litho-unit C and upper part of litho-unit B demonstrates a value consistently close to two and show a small stable rise up to a value around three in the lower part of litho-unit B (Figure 3). Total organic carbon and δ¹³C-org in the samples range from 0.06 to 0.26 weight% and from −22 to −26 ‰ respectively (Table 2a). The CdEF shows a weak but statistically significant (Pearson coefficient correlation < 0.05) negative correlation with δ¹³C-org and Al (Figure 4(c), (e) and Table 2b) and a statistically significant weak to moderate positive correlation with CoEF, PEF and Mn/Al (Figure 4(d) and Figure 5(a), (b)). The δ¹³C-org shows a weak but statistically significant positive correlation with TOC and LOI (Figure 4(a), (b) and Table 2b).

Table 2a. Trace elements (in ppm), Al, TOC, LOI (loss on ignition) (Weight%) and δ¹³C-org (in ‰) data from the Sirbu Shale samples. BM denotes before remineralization and loss denotes loss during diagenesis of Sirbu Shale

Table 2b. Correlation matrix (R values) among trace elements enrichment factor, Al, Mn/Al, Fe/Al, TOC, δ¹³C-org and LOI of Sirbu Shale samples

Table 3. The range of Th/Co and Th/Cr ratios in Sirbu Shale, felsic rocks, mafic rocks and upper continental crust

Fig. 3. Stratigraphic profile of VEF, CrEF, CoEF, NiEF, MoEF, CdEF, UEF, TOC, δ¹³C-org, TOCbm and TOCloss for Sirbu Shale samples.

Fig. 4. The cross plots of (a) δ13C versus TOC, (b) δ13C versus LOI, (c) CdEF versus δ13C, (d) CdEF versus CoEF, (e) Al versus CdEF and (f) Al versus CoEF for Sirbu Shale samples.

Fig. 5. The cross plots of (a) PEF versus CdEF, (b) Mn/Al versus CdEF, and (c) Fe/Al versus CdEF for Sirbu Shale samples.

The minimum and maximum range for TOCbm estimated by using Eq.4 are 0.71 to 5.08% (average 1.65%) and 1.43 to 10.16% (average 3.31%), respectively (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 3). The minimum and maximum range for TOCloss estimated by using Eq.5 are 1.37 to 9.90% (average 3.16%) and 0.65 to 4.82% (average 1.5%), respectively (Supplementary Table 3). Stratigraphic variations in TOCbm shows two distinct regimes: first covers the litho-unit B, in which average TOCbm ranges from 2.33% to 4.66% (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 3), and second the litho-unit C, in which average TOCbm ranges from 0.98% to 1.96%. The average Cd/Mo ratio in litho-units B and C are 0.97 and 0.55.

5. Discussions

5.1. Diagenetic changes in Cd and δ¹³C-org records

Prior understanding of diagenetic changes in the biogeochemical records of geologically aged sediments and rock samples is essential before those parameters can be used for palaeo-reconstructions. Early diagenetic processes in the sediments can remobilise the trace elements resulting in depletion or authigenic enrichment of the elements, which is commonly associated with aerobic and anaerobic oxidation of organic matter. These changes complicate the use of trace metals and stable isotopes for palaeo-reconstruction. In marine sediments, Cd buildup is frequently observed in the suboxic to sulphidic zones in conjunction with organic matter and sulphides (Rosenthal et al. Reference Rosenthal, Lam, Boyle and Thomson1995). The oxidation of sedimentary sulphides and organic matter at the interface between oxic and anoxic horizons can fluctuate on a millimetre-scale within the top sediment depending on the bottom water oxygen condition. This process can remobilise some proportion of sedimentary Cd into the bottom water (Gendron et al. Reference Gendron, Silverberg, Sundby and Lebel1986; Rosenthal et al. Reference Rosenthal, Lam, Boyle and Thomson1995; van Geen et al. Reference van Geen, McCorkle and Klinkhammer1995). According to Rosenthal et al. (Reference Rosenthal, Lam, Boyle and Thomson1995), Cd in sedimentary pore waters is primarily sourced from early diagenetic oxidation of sedimentary organic matter. It typically moves downward along the concentration gradients established by its removal near the redox boundary. The major removal of Cd from sedimentary pore waters may occur through the formation of insoluble CdS phases (Rosenthal et al. Reference Rosenthal, Lam, Boyle and Thomson1995; Plass et al. Reference Plass, Schlosser, Sommer, Dale, Achterberg and Scholz2020) and to some extent by its adsorption on Fe/Mn oxide particles (McCorkle & Klinkhammer, Reference McCorkle and Klinkhammer1991). According to Plass et al. (Reference Plass, Schlosser, Sommer, Dale, Achterberg and Scholz2020), the solubility of trace metals sulphides (CdS<<FeS/FeS2) is the crucial factor influencing their precipitation and accumulation in marine sediments. For example, CdS solubility in suboxic to anoxic conditions is found very low (Bryan et al. Reference Bryan, Dickson, Dowdall, Homoky, Porcelli and Henderson2021; Chen et al. Reference Chen, Little, Kreissig, Severmann and McManus2021; Janssen et al. Reference Janssen, Conway, John, Christian, Kramer, Pedersen and Cullen2014, Reference Janssen, Abouchami, Galer, Purdon and Cullen2019), but re-dissolution has been observed in highly sulphidic environments through formation of bi-sulphide or poly-sulphide complexes (Gobeil et al. 1987; Plass et al. Reference Plass, Schlosser, Sommer, Dale, Achterberg and Scholz2020; Chen et al. Reference Chen, Little, Kreissig, Severmann and McManus2021). Given the limited post-depositional release of CdS from sediment (due to its lower solubility) in suboxic to anoxic settings (Bryan et al. Reference Bryan, Dickson, Dowdall, Homoky, Porcelli and Henderson2021; Chen et al. Reference Chen, Little, Kreissig, Severmann and McManus2021; Janssen et al. Reference Janssen, Conway, John, Christian, Kramer, Pedersen and Cullen2014, Reference Janssen, Abouchami, Galer, Purdon and Cullen2019), Cd seems more trustworthy among trace elements to be utilized as a proxy for palaeoproductivity and palaeoredox studies for non-euxinic sediments or rock deposits (Viehmann et al. Reference Viehmann, Hohl, Kraemer, Bau, Walde, Galer, Jiang and Meister2019).

According to Morse and Luther III (1999), divalent trace metals such as Cd and Mn can form a sulphide mineral more quickly than iron and non-divalent trace metals (V, Cr, Ni, Co, Mo and U) because of their higher water exchange rates. Hence under the trace sulphide concentration, Cd and Mn are most likely to precipitate in considerable amounts when compared to V, Cr, Ni, Co, Mo and U. Additionally, compared to V, Cr, Ni, Co, Mo and U, the sulphide minerals of Cd and Mn are found more resistant to oxidative remobilization (Simpson et al. Reference Simpson, Apte and Batley1998). Thus, two possibilities could account for the large enrichment of Cd but no enrichment of V, Cr, Ni, Co and Mo in the Sirbu Shale: (1) the Sirbu Shale was deposited in a suboxic environment with trace amounts of sulphide production that were enough to precipitate Cd, Mn and other divalent trace metals but no others; (2) The Sirbu Shale deposition took place under suboxic to an anoxic condition that precipitated a significant amount of divalent (Cd and Mn) as well as non-divalent trace metals (V, Cr, Ni, Co, Mo and U), but during the intermittent oxygenation of sediments, non-divalent sulphides redissolved rapidly into the overlying water column. In contrast, sulfides of divalent trace metals underwent little change. A significant positive correlation of CdEF with Mn/Al (Figure 5(b)) can be considered as evidence for little to no significant remobilization of Cd and Mn. But no correlation between Cd and Fe/Al (Figure 5(c)) suggests a significant remobilization of Fe during diagenetic history.

Additionally, over several million years, the maturation/thermal cracking of the organic matter in the sediment under high pressure and temperature conditions can result in the release of labile organic components in the form of liquids and gases, which can remobilise the trace elements as well (Ardakani et al. Reference Ardakani, Chappaz, Sanei and Mayer2016; Wilde et al. Reference Wilde, Lyons and Quinby-Hunt2004). A recent experimental study by Dickson et al. (Reference Dickson, Idiz, Porcelli and van den Boorn2020), however, demonstrated that this process may lead to a loss of organic matter from the rocks and an increase in organically bound trace elements. A negative correlation of CdEF with TOC and LOI (Table 2b) in this study can be an indication of slight enrichment of Cd during TOC loss through cracking of sedimentary organic matter during rock maturation. Such changes in Cd concentration during the maturation process are minor in comparison to the bulk enrichment of Cd in the shale samples (Dickson et al. Reference Dickson, Idiz, Porcelli and van den Boorn2020) and can be disregarded.

Organic carbon isotope values during early diagenesis in a range of environments can change by ±2.5 ‰ (Freudenthal et al. Reference Freudenthal, Wagner, Wenzhöfer, Zabel and Wefer2001; Lehmann et al. Reference Lehmann, Bernasconi, Barbieri and McKenzie2002). Typically, a decrease in δ¹³C of organic matter has been reported during their degradation because 12C-enriched organic compounds are relatively more stable/refractory than ¹³C-enriched organic compounds (Freudenthal et al. Reference Freudenthal, Wagner, Wenzhöfer, Zabel and Wefer2001). Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that residual sedimentary organic matter of the oxic zone contains a lower proportion of refractory organic matter compared to that of the anoxic zone, which suggests that the carbon isotope effect associated with organic matter remineralization in the anoxic zone would be higher than that occur in the oxic zone (Jochum et al. Reference Jochum, Friedrich, Leythaeuser, Littke and Ropertz1995; Partin et al. Reference Partin, Bekker, Planavsky, Scott, Gill, Li, Podkovyrov, Maslov, Konhauser, Lalonde, Love, Poulton and Lyons2013; Lindsey et al. Reference Lindsey, Rimmer and Anderson2018). This shows that the significant positive correlation of TOC with δ¹³C and LOI (Figures 4(a), (b)) observed in the Sirbu Shale samples can be a result of the isotopic effect associated with the remineralization of sedimentary organic matter.

5.2. Palaeoredox environment and trace metal enrichment

The RSTEs, which are water-soluble in oxidized form and water-insoluble in reduced form, i.e., Cr and V, show no enrichment. It can be explained by either depletion of these trace metals in source rocks, i.e., terrestrial felsic rocks (Morris, Reference Morris1986; Paikaray et al. Reference Paikaray, Banerjee and Mukherji2008; Absar et al. Reference Absar, Raza, Roy, Naqvi and Roy2009; Banerjee & Banerjee, Reference Banerjee and Banerjee2010) or their progressive loss in low salinity water (Morris, Reference Morris1986; O′Connor et al. 2015). The trace elements ratios such as Th/Co and Th/Cr, which are found significantly different for felsic and mafic rocks (Nagarajan et al. Reference Nagarajan, Madhavaraju, Nagendra, Armstrong-Altrin and Moutte2007), suggest a predominant felsic source for the Sirbu Shale (Table 3). The UEF of the Sirbu Shale ranging, between 1.8 and 2.8, is consistent with the modern marine sediments deposited in suboxic conditions or nitrate reduction zone (Algeo & Li, 2020; Kessarkar et al. 2022). Small intermittent enrichment of Co could be associated with its co-precipitation along with Cd in the organic matter or with the trace of sulphides, which is evident from the significant positive correlation between CdEF and CoEF (Figure 4(d)). Furthermore, CdEF and CoEF show a significant negative correlation with detrital tracer element Al (Figure 4(e), (f)), which supports the notion that their large proportion in the sediments was associated with non-detrital deposition (Rosenthal et al. Reference Rosenthal, Lam, Boyle and Thomson1995; Janssen et al. Reference Janssen, Conway, John, Christian, Kramer, Pedersen and Cullen2014; Dickson et al. Reference Dickson, Idiz, Porcelli and van den Boorn2020). The adsorption of Cd and Co on the clay minerals, which tends to increase with a rise in Mn2+ concentration, could also have immobilized them in addition to organic matter and sulphides in a suboxic to the anoxic environment (Groeningen et al. Reference Groeningen, Glück, Christl and Kretzschmar2020). A statistically significant moderate positive correlation among CdEF, CoEF and Mn (Figure 4 and Table 2b) supports the latter possibility.

The sourcing of Cd and Co, as well as Mn, was most likely from the upwelling region in the relatively deeper marine shelf region (Wagner et al. Reference Wagner, Hendy, McKay and Pedersen2013; Sweere et al. Reference Sweere, van den Boorn, Dickson and Reichart2016, Reference Sweere, Dickson, Jenkyns, Porcelli and Henderson2020). The relatively high enrichment level of Cd but no significant enrichment of other trace elements in the Sirbu Shale closely matches with the modern marine surface sediments underlying the suboxic zone of Chile margins (Böning et al. Reference Böning, Cuypers, Grunwald, Schnetger and Brumsack2005), which is one of the most prominent seasonal upwelling zones in the modern ocean. This suggests that the Sirbu Shale was deposited in a setting similar to that in which modern suboxic sediments of the Chilean margin are deposited. In light of this conclusion, the substantial enrichment of Cd in the shale, but the lack of considerable enrichment in other trace elements, can also be utilized as a palaeo-indicator of a suboxic marine environment driven by seasonal upwelling. However, testing this hypothesis will require more such data from black shale deposits and modern anoxic basins.

5.3. Palaeoproductivity

In marine/freshwater basins, during the transit from primary production (photosynthesis) to burial in sediments, organic matter undergoes rapid remineralization, which is mainly controlled by water column oxygen condition, type of organic matter exported (more refractory or more labile) and sedimentation rate (Burdige, Reference Burdige2007). The efficiency of this process is found variable on the spatial scale (Lutz et al. Reference Lutz, Caldeira, Dunbar and Behrenfeld2007) and over geological time (Raven & Falkowski, Reference Raven and Falkowski1999). It has been found that under oxygenated marine water column conditions, less than 0.5% of organic matter from gross primary production reaches the sediments (Burdige, Reference Burdige2007), therefore not a true representative of primary productivity (Lopes et al. Reference Lopes, Kucera and Mix2015). In the Sirbu Shale, TOC contents remain persistently below 0.26% (Table 2a) with an average value of 0.18%, suggesting that either primary productivity was originally low, or if primary productivity was high, the burial efficiency of photosynthetically derived organic matter was poor due to frequent ventilation of the water column and/or low sedimentation rate. Under these circumstances, Cd released from the remineralization of organic matter moves towards the oxic-anoxic boundary in the subsurface sediment due to a concentration gradient caused by Cd precipitation with sulphide traces in suboxic-anoxic zones. Therefore, Cd can provide a more accurate depiction of the primary production than TOC itself, preserved in ancient sedimentary records. The CdEF in this study shows a weak but statistically significant (Pearson coefficient = 0.000355) correlation (Figure 5(a) and Table 2b) with PEF, demonstrating a small enrichment compared to UCC. Since P is an essential nutrient that controls the oceanic primary productivity and organic matter export to the sediment is one of the most important contributors to sedimentary P content in marine environment, the enrichment of P in marine sedimentary records is also used as a strong proxy for delineating palaeoproductivity (Ruttenberg and Berner, Reference Ruttenberg and Berner1993; Schenau et al. Reference Schenau, Reichart and De Lange2005). However, a large fraction of P from sedimentary organic matter is often released back into the water column during early digenesis remineralization (Ruttenberg and Berner, Reference Ruttenberg and Berner1993; Sulu-Gambari et al. Reference Sulu-Gambari, Hagens, Behrends, Seitaj, Meysman, Middelburg and Slomp2018). The phosphorus content in the Sirbu Shale is found comparative to the sediments of a seasonally hypoxic modern marine basin (Schenau et al. Reference Schenau, Reichart and De Lange2005). Thus, the enrichment of Cd and P and a significant correlation between the two in Sirbu Shale can be considered compelling evidence of high primary productivity in the concomitant depositional environment.

The average minimum and maximum TOCbm (organic matter that made it to the sediment through the water column) calculated using Eq.4, for the Sirbu Shale, are 1.65 and 3.31%, respectively. These average TOCbm values closely overlap the TOC values (1.53 to 3.45%) reported from the modern marine sediments underlying the suboxic waters of Chile margin’s oxygen minimum zone, which are subject to substantial seasonal upwelling and high primary productivity (Böning et al. Reference Böning, Cuypers, Grunwald, Schnetger and Brumsack2005). TOCbm shows an overall stratigraphic decrease in the studied section of the Sirbu Shale (Figure 3). This stratigraphic variation of TOCbm indicates that the litho-unit B was deposited under relatively higher productivity and less ventilated conditions compared to the litho-unit C. The average TOCloss (calculated by subtracting the bulk TOC value of sample from the TOCbm) through remineralization during the deposition of the litho-unit B ranging from 94 to 97% was noticeably higher than during the deposition of the litho-unit C, which has the average TOCloss ranged from 82 to 91% (see Supplementary Table 3). These results indicate that the TOCloss through diagenesis/remineralization during the higher primary productivity was relatively higher and vice-versa. As the sedimentological studies of Sirbu Shale suggest that litho-unit B was deposited in a relatively deeper sea-shelf environment (around storm wave-base) compared to litho-unit C (deposited near fair weather wave-base) (Figure 6; Singh & Chakraborty, Reference Singh and Chakraborty2022), the higher TOCloss in litho-unit B seems to be a result of relatively slower sedimentation rate. According to studies of marine sediments, TOCloss > 80% through remineralization in marine sediments is generally associated with the sediments underlying suboxic to oxic water column (Burdige, Reference Burdige2007). These shifts in the primary productivity might have been driven by changes in nutrient supply through terrestrial discharge and/or through an upwelling-productivity feedback loop over the continental shelf (Pedersen & Calvert, Reference Pedersen and Calvert1990; Wyrtki, Reference Wyrtki1962).

Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of Sirbu Shale palaeodepositional environment and palaeoproductivity. B in the figure denotes the palaeodepositional position of litho-units B and C denotes the palaeodepositional position of litho-unit C in the basin.

5.4 Upwelling and basin restriction

The Cd/Mo ratios in Sirbu Shale are greater than 0.36 (Figure 7), implying that the studied section was most likely deposited in an open marine shelf condition. Furthermore, Figure 7, adapted from Sweere et al. (Reference Sweere, van den Boorn, Dickson and Reichart2016), shows that Cd/Mo ratios of litho-unit B fall in the perennial upwelling zone, and Cd/Mo ratios of litho-unit C fall in the seasonal upwelling zone. Detailed comparison of the Sirbu Shale Cd/Mo data with the trace metal data from oxygen-depleted basins (Sweere et al. Reference Sweere, van den Boorn, Dickson and Reichart2016 and reference therein) reveals more similarity with the sediment core records of the Arabian Sea (average Cd/Mo = 0.14) (Van der Weijden et al. Reference van der Weijden, Reichart and van Os2006) and the Gulf of California (average Cd/Mo ratio = 0.21) (Brumsack, Reference Brumsack1989), which are known for seasonal upwelling condition. Sedimentary Cd/Mo ratios in hydrographically restricted basins are generally found close to that in seawater composition (average Cd/Mo ∼ 0.0057, Sarmiento et al. Reference Sarmiento, Gruber, Brzezinski and Dunne2004) but an increase in the influence (frequency) of upwelling leads to a Cd/Mo ratio closer to the phytoplankton composition (average Cd/Mo ∼ 7.9, Ho et al. Reference Ho, Quigg, Finkel, Milligan, Wyman, Falkowski and Morel2003). Therefore, the accumulations of Cd-rich phytoplankton reaching the sediments in upwelling-induced high productivity settings are likely to contribute a strong Cd enrichment (Sweere et al. Reference Sweere, van den Boorn, Dickson and Reichart2016, Reference Sweere, Dickson, Jenkyns, Porcelli and Henderson2020).

Fig. 7. Mo versus Cd plot for Sirbu Shale samples with regression lines forced through the origin, representing Cd/Mo ratios for marine phytoplankton, perennial upwelling, seasonal upwelling, and weakly restricted conditions. This figure is adapted from Sweere et al. (Reference Sweere, van den Boorn, Dickson and Reichart2016).

Given the above interpretation, we must admit that basin morphology, redox structure (i.e., coverage of anoxic and euxinic sea floor) and terrestrial influx in the Precambrian basins might be substantially different from the modern anoxic basins. For example, studies have demonstrated that trace metal drawdown in the Proterozoic ocean was perhaps greater than today due to larger coverage of anoxic and euxinic sea seafloor, which would have varied over the geological time scale (Reinhard et al. Reference Reinhard, Planavsky, Robbins, Partin, Gill, Lalonde, Bekker, Konhauser and Lyons2013, Reference Reinhard, Planavsky, Olson, Lyons and Erwin2016). Therefore, we are sceptical about to what extent such a trace metal ratio model based on modern anoxic basin studies can accurately interpret the Precambrian oceanic environment. It remains a question that must be debated and addressed in future studies.

6. Conclusion

In the post-NOE, Precambrian Ocean productivity varied from moderate to high depending upon the varying intensity of nutrient supply through upwelling in deeper marine shelf regions. However, TOC from the rock records does not reflect these variations in productivity because of high TOCloss through remineralization in the water column as well as in the surface sediment during early diagenesis resulting in a very low TOC content in the sedimentary rock record, which on stratigraphic scale appears almost invariable. This study demonstrated that authigenic Cd enrichment in sedimentary rocks can be used with fair confidence to estimate total organic matter exported to the seafloor during deposition. However, more such studies are recommended to strengthen this finding. The following are the key findings of this study:

  • This study demonstrated that the Sirbu Shale was deposited in a hydrographically restricted open marine shelf environment, which experienced strong upwelling and led to high primary productivity.

  • The findings imply that the deposition of the Sirbu Shale occurred in the close vicinity of a major marine oxygen minimum zone.

  • During the deposition of litho-unit B of Sirbu Shale, the average TOC exported to the sediments ranged from 2.3 to 4.6%, and 93 to 96% of it was lost through remineralization during diagenesis. Whereas during the deposition of litho-unit C of Sirbu Shale, average TOC exported to the sediments varied from 1 to 2%, and 81 to 91% of it was lost through remineralization during diagenesis.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756823000614

Acknowledgement

We are thankful to the Director of BSIP for throughout support. Lab work was performed by Dr. Shailesh Agarwal, Archana Sonkar, Ishwar Rahi and Sandeep Kohri. The help of Yogesh Kumar in data visualization/artwork is very much appreciated. We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions, which were immensely helpful in improving the MS.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by BSIP under Project 1 (2021-2025). The BSIP contribution number for this MS is BSIP/RDCC/Publication no. 84/2020-21.

References

Absar, N, Raza, M, Roy, M, Naqvi, S and Roy, AK (2009) Composition and weathering conditions of Paleoproterozoic upper crust of Bundelkhand craton, Central India: records from geochemistry of clastic sediments of 1.9 Ga Gwalior Group. Precambrian Research 168, 313329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2008.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, S, Srivastava, P, Sonam Meena, NK, Rai, SK, Bhushan, R, Misra, DK and Gupta, AK (2015) Stable (δ13C and δ15N) isotopes and magnetic susceptibility record of late Holocene climate change from a lake profile of the northeast Himalaya. Journal of the Geological Society of India 86, 696705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-015-0362-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, TJ and Li, C (2020) Redox classification and calibration of redox thresholds in sedimentary systems. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 287, 826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2020.01.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anbar, AD and Knoll, AH (2002) Proterozoic ocean chemistry and evolution: a bioinorganic bridge? Science 297, 11371142. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069651 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansari, AH, Ahmad, S, Govil, P, Agrawal, S and Mathews, RP (2020) Mo-Ni and organic carbon isotope signatures of the mid-late Mesoproterozoic oxygenation. Journal of Asian Earth Science 191, 104201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansari, AH, Pandey, S K, Sharma, M, Agrawal, S and Kumar, Y (2018) Carbon and oxygen isotope stratigraphy of the Ediacaran Bilara Group, Marwar Supergroup, India: evidence for high amplitude carbon isotopic negative excursions. Precambrian Research 308, 7591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansari, AH, Singh, VK, Sharma, M and Kumar, K (2022) High authigenic Co enrichment in the non-euxinic buff-grey and black shale of the Chandarpur Group, Chhattisgarh Supergroup: implication for the late Mesoproterozoic shallow marine redox condition. Terra Nova 34(1), 7282. https://doi.org/10.1111/ter.12564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardakani, OH, Chappaz, A, Sanei, H and Mayer, B (2016) Effect of thermal maturity on remobilization of molybdenum in black shales. Earth Planetery Science Letters 449, 311320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A and Banerjee, D (2010) Modal analysis and geochemistry of two sandstones of the Bhander Group (Late Neoproterozoic) in parts of the Central Indian Vindhyan basin and their bearing on the provenance and tectonics. Journal of Earth System Science 119, 825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-010-0056-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, A (1993) The Upper Vindhyan of Maihar-Field Guide. Geological Society of India, Bangaluru, India. 98 pp.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, A (1996) Foreword. Geological Society of India Memoir, 36, ii-viii.Google Scholar
Böning, P, Cuypers, S, Grunwald, M, Schnetger, B and Brumsack, HJ (2005) Geochemical characteristics of Chilean upwelling sediments at ∼36°S. Marine Geology 220(1–4), 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2005.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, EA, Sclater, F and Edmond, J (1976) On the marine geochemistry of cadmium. Nature 263, 4244. https://doi.org/10.1038/263042a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumsack, HJ (1989) Geochemistry of recent TOC-rich sediments from the Gulf of California and the Black Sea. Geologische Rundschau 78(3), 851882. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01829327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumsack, HJ (2006) The trace metal content of recent organic carbon-rich sediments: implications for Cretaceous black shale formation. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoclogy 232, 344361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, AL, Dickson, AJ, Dowdall, F, Homoky, WB, Porcelli, D and Henderson, GM (2021) Controls on the cadmium isotope composition of modern marine sediments. Earth and Planetery Science Letters 565, 116946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdige, DJ (2007) Preservation of organic matter in marine sediments: controls, mechanisms, and an imbalance in sediment organic carbon budgets? Chemical Reviews 107, 467485. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050347q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canfield, DE, Poulton, SW and Narbonne, GM (2007) Late-Neoproterozoic deep-ocean oxygenation and the rise of animal life. Science 315, 9295. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cawood, PA, Zhao, G, Yao, J, Wang, W, Xu, Y and Wang, Y (2018) Reconstructing South China in Phanerozoic and Precambrian supercontinents. Earth Science Reviews 186, 173194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L, Little, SH, Kreissig, K, Severmann, S and McManus, J (2021) Isotopically light Cd in sediments underlying oxygen deficient zones. Frontiers in Earth Science 9, 623720. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.623720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, AR and Compston, W (1969) The age of the Vindhyan system of peninsular India. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 125, 351371. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.125.1.0351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, JT (2006) On the nonlinear relationship between dissolved cadmium and phosphate in the modern global ocean: could chronic iron limitation of phytoplankton growth cause the kink? Limnology and Oceanography 51, 13691380. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.3.1369 Google Scholar
Cullers, RL (1994) The controls on the major and trace element variation of shales, siltstones, and sandstones of Pennsylvanian-Permian age from uplifted continental blocks in Colorado to platform sediment in Kansas, USA. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 58(22), 49554972. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(94)90224-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullers, RL (2000) The geochemistry of shales, siltstones and sandstones of Pennsylvanian–Permian age, Colorado, USA: implications for provenance and metamorphic studies. Lithos 51(3), 181203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937(99)00063-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, C (2003) Possible organisms similar to Ediacaran forms from the Bhander Group, Vindhyan Supergroup, late Neoproterozoic of India. Journal of Asian Earth Science 21(4), 387395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00036-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, C (2006) Ediacara fossil assemblage in the upper Vindhyans of central India and its significance. Journal of Asian Earth Science 27(5), 660683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De, C (2009) The Vindhyan Ediacaran fossil and trace fossil assemblages; their insights into early metazoan palaeobiology, palaeobiogeography and Vindhyan biostratigraphy. Indian Journal of Geosciences 63(1), 1140.Google Scholar
Deb, SP (2004) Lithostratigraphy of the Neoproterozoic Chattisgarh Sequence, its bearing on the tectonics and palaeogeography. Gondwana Research 7, 323337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70787-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, AJ, Idiz, E, Porcelli, D and van den Boorn, SH (2020) The influence of thermal maturity on the stable isotope compositions and concentrations of molybdenum, zinc and cadmium in organic-rich marine mudrocks. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 287, 205220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, DH, Laflamme, M, Tweedt, SM, Sperling, EA, Pisani, D and Peterson, KJ (2011) The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals. Science 334, 10911097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206375 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freudenthal, T, Wagner, T, Wenzhöfer, F., Zabel, M and Wefer, G (2001) Early diagenesis of organic matter from sediments of the eastern subtropical Atlantic: evidence from stable nitrogen and carbon isotopes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65, 17951808. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00554-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, G and Chakraborty, C (1997) Stable isotopes in marine carbonates: their implications for the paleoenvironment with special reference to the Proterozoic Vindhyan carbonates (Central India). Journal of Geological Society of India 50, 131159.Google Scholar
Friedman, GM, Chakraborty, C and Kolkas, MM (1996) δ13C excursion in the End-Proterozoic strata of the Vindhyan basin (central India): its chronostratigraphic significance. Carbonate and Evaporite 11, 206212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03175638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendron, A, Silverberg, N, Sundby, B and Lebel, J (1986) Early diagenesis of cadmium and cobalt in sediments of the Laurentian Trough. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 50, 741747. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(86)90350-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiev, SV, Horner, TJ, Stein, HJ, Hannah, JL, Bingen, B and Rehkämper, M (2015) Cadmium-isotopic evidence for increasing primary productivity during the Late Permian anoxic event. Earth and Planetery Science Letters 410, 8496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladkochub, DP, Donskaya, TV, Stanevich, AM, Pisarevsky, SA, Zhang, S, Motova, ZL, Mazukabzov, AM and Li, H (2019) U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology and provenance of Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks in southern Siberia: new insights into breakup of Rodinia and opening of Paleo-Asian Ocean. Gondwana Research 65, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2018.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobeil, C, Silverberg, N, Sundby, B and Cossa, D (1987) Cadmium diagenesis in Laurentian Trough sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 51(3), 589596. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(87)90071-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalan, K, Kumar, A, Kumar, S and Vijaygopal, B (2013) Depositional history of the Upper Vindhyan succession, central India: time constraints from Pb-Pb isochron ages of its carbonate components. Precambrian Research 233, 108117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groeningen, NV, Glück, B, Christl, I and Kretzschmar, R (2020) Surface precipitation of Mn 2+ on clay minerals enhances Cd 2+ sorption under anoxic conditions. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 22(8), 16541665. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00155D Google ScholarPubMed
Hendry, KR, Rickaby, RE, de Hoog, JC, Weston, K and Rehkämper, M (2008) Cadmium and phosphate in coastal Antarctic seawater: implications for Southern Ocean nutrient cycling. Marine Chemistry 112, 149157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, TY, Quigg, A, Finkel, ZV, Milligan, AJ, Wyman, K, Falkowski, PG and Morel, FM (2003) The elemental composition of some marine phytoplankton. Journal of Phycology 39(6), 11451159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.2003.03-090.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohl, S, Galer, S, Gamper, A and Becker, H (2017) Cadmium isotope variations in Neoproterozoic carbonates–A tracer of biologic production? Geochemical Perspectives Letters 3, 3244. doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohl, SV, Jiang, SY, Viehmann, S, Wei, W, Liu, Q, Wei, HZ and Galer, SJ (2020) Trace metal and Cd isotope systematics of the basal Datangpo Formation, Yangtze Platform (South China) indicate restrained (bio) geochemical metal cycling in Cryogenian seawater. Geosciences 10(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10010036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohl, SV, Jiang, SY, Wei, HZ, Pi, DH, Liu, Q, Viehmann, S and Galer, SJ (2019) Cd isotopes trace periodic (bio) geochemical metal cycling at the verge of the Cambrian animal evolution. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 263, 195214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.07.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, DJ, Abouchami, W, Galer, SJG, Purdon, KB and Cullen, JT (2019) Particulate cadmium stable isotopes in the subarctic northeast Pacific reveal dynamic Cd cycling and a new isotopically light Cd sink. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 515, 6778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, DJ, Conway, TM, John, SG, Christian, JR, Kramer, DI, Pedersen, TF and Cullen, JT (2014) Undocumented water column sink for cadmium in open ocean oxygen-deficient zones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111(19), 68886893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402388111 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, YY, Kong, DX, Qin, T, Li, X, Caetano-Anolles, G and Zhang, HY (2012) The impact of oxygen on metabolic evolution: a chemoinformatic investigation. PLOS Computational Biology 8, e1002426. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002426 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, C, Li, C, Algeo, TJ, Planavsky, NJ, Cui, H, Yang, X, Zhao, Y, Zhang, X and Xie, S (2016) A highly redox-heterogeneous ocean in South China during the early Cambrian (∼529–514 Ma): implications for biota-environment co-evolution. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 441, 3851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochum, J, Friedrich, G, Leythaeuser, D, Littke, R and Ropertz, B (1995) Hydrocarbon-bearing fluid inclusions in calcite-filled horizontal fractures from mature Posidonia Shale (Hils Syncline, NW Germany). Ore Geology Reviews 9, 363370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1368(94)00019-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, SG, Kunzmann, M, Townsend, EJ and Rosenberg, AD (2017) Zinc and cadmium stable isotopes in the geological record: a case study from the post-snowball Earth Nuccaleena cap dolostone. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 466, 202208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokhan Ram, Shukla SN, Pramanik, AG, Verma, BK, Chandra, G and Murthy, MSN (1996) Recent investigation in Vindhyan Basin: implications for the Basin tectonics. Geological Society of India Memoir 36, 267286.Google Scholar
Kessarkar, PM, Fernandes, LL, Parthiban, G, Kurian, S, Shenoy, DM, Pattan, JN, Rao, VP, Naqvi, SWA and Verma, S (2022) Geochemistry of sediments in contact with oxygen minimum zone of the eastern Arabian Sea: proxy for palaeo-studies. Journal of Earth System Science 131(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-022-01823-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoll, AH (2011) The multiple origins of complex multicellularity. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 39, 217239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, MS (1968) Geology of India and Burma. Madras, India: Higginbothems (P) Ltd. 211 pp.Google Scholar
Krishnan, MS and Swaminath, J (1959) The Great Vindhyan Basin of northern India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 1, 1036.Google Scholar
Kumar, B, Das Sharma, S, Sreenivas, B, Dayal, AM, Rao, MN, Dubey, N and Chawla, BR (2002) Carbon, oxygen and strontium isotope geochemistry of Proterozoic carbonate rocks of the Vindhyan Basin, central India. Precambrian Research 113(1–2), 4363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00199-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumari, V, Tandon, SK, Tomson, JK and Ghatak, A (2023) Detrital zircon U-Pb ages of Proterozoic and Cretaceous sandstones of Narmada region in Central India: Implications for provenance and the closure age of the Vindhyan Basin. EarthArXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.31223/X5D94R Google Scholar
Kumar, S (1976a) Stromatolites from the Vindhyan rocks of Son Valley- Maihar area, districts Mirzapur (U. P.) and Satna (M. P.). Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 18, 1321.Google Scholar
Kumar, S (1976b) Significance of stromatolites in the correlation of Semri Series (Lower Vindhyans) of Son Valley and Chitrakut area, M. P. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 19, 2427.Google Scholar
Kumar, S (1999) Siliceous sponge spicule-like forms from the Neoproterozoic Bhander Limestone, Maihar area, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 44, 141148.Google Scholar
Kumar, S and Pandey, SK (2008) Arumberia and associated fossils from the Neoproterozoic Maihar Sandstone, Vindhyan Supergroup, Central India. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 53, 8397.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Schidlowski, M and Joachimski, MM (2005) Carbon isotope stratigraphy of the Palaeo-Neoproterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup, central India; implications for basin evolution and intrabasinal correlation. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 50(1), 6581.Google Scholar
Kumar, S and Sharma, M (2012) Vindhyan Basin, Son Valley area, Central India, Field Guide-4. The Palaeontological Society of India, Lucknow, India. 145 pp.Google Scholar
Kumar, S and Srivastava, P (1997) A note on the carbonaceous megafossils from the Neoproterozoic Bhander Group, Maihar area, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 42, 141146.Google Scholar
Kumar, S and Srivastava, P (2003) Carbonaceous megafossils from the Neoproterozoic Bhander Group, Central India. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 48, 139154.Google Scholar
Lan, Z, Zhang, S, Li, XH, Pandey, SK, Sharma, M, Shukla, Y, Ahmad, S, Sarkar, S and Zhai, M (2020) Towards resolving the ‘jigsaw puzzle’and age-fossil inconsistency within East Gondwana. Precambrian Research 345, 105775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, TW, Saito, MA, George, GN, Pickering, IJ, Prince, RC and Morel, FM (2005) A cadmium enzyme from a marine diatom. Nature 435, 42. https://doi.org/10.1038/435042a CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, MF, Bernasconi, SM, Barbieri, A and McKenzie, JA (2002) Preservation of organic matter and alteration of its carbon and nitrogen isotope composition during simulated and in situ early sedimentary diagenesis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66, 35733584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00968-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenton, TM, Boyle, RA, Poulton, SW, Shields-Zhou, GA and Butterfield, NJ (2014) Co-evolution of eukaryotes and ocean oxygenation in the Neoproterozoic era. Nature Geoscience 7, 257265. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C, Planavsky, NJ, Shi, W, Zhang, Z, Zhou, C, Cheng, M, Tarhan, LG, Luo, G and Xie, S (2015) Ediacaran marine redox heterogeneity and early animal ecosystems. Scientific Reports 5, 17097. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17097 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsey, DR, Rimmer, SM and Anderson, KB (2018) Are redox-sensitive geochemical proxies valid in mature shales? Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTEC), URTEC-2901011-MS. Houston, Texas, 23-25 July 2018. September 2018, 2854–2860 pp. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2018-2901011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, C, Kucera, M and Mix, AC (2015) Climate change decouples oceanic primary and export productivity and organic carbon burial. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 112, 332335. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410480111 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Löscher, BM, De Jong, JT and De Baar, HJ (1998) The distribution and preferential biological uptake of cadmium at 6° W in the Southern Ocean. Marine Chemistry 62, 259286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(98)00045-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, MJ, Caldeira, K, Dunbar, RB and Behrenfeld, MJ (2007) Seasonal rhythms of net primary production and particulate organic carbon flux to depth describe the efficiency of biological pump in the global ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 112, C10011. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, RC, Dehler, CM, Link, PK, Karlstrom, KE and Gehrels, GE (2014) Geochronologic and stratigraphic constraints on the Mesoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic Pahrump Group, Death Valley, California: a record of the assembly, stability, and breakup of Rodinia. GSA Bulletin 126, 652664. https://doi.org/10.1130/B30956.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, SJ, Meert, JG, Banerjee, DM, Pandit, MK, Tamrat, J, Kamenov, GD, Prashan, VR and Sohl, LI (2008) Paleomagnetism and detrital zircon geochemistry of the Upper Vindhyan sequence of Son Valley and Rajasthan: a ca. 1000 Ma closure age for the Purana Basin. Precambrian Research 164, 137159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2008.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, S (1987) Geochronology and biostratigraphy of the Vindhyan Supergroup. Visesa Prakasana-Bharatiya Bhuvaijñanika Sarveksana 11, 2344.Google Scholar
McCorkle, DC and Klinkhammer, GP (1991) Porewater cadmium geochemistry and the porewater cadmium: δ13C relationship. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 55, 161168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90408-W CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, NR, Hughes, NC, Myrow, PM, Xiao, S and Sharma, M (2011) Correlation of Precambrian-Cambrian sedimentary successions across northern India and the utility of isotopic signatures of Himalayan lithotectonic zones. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 312, 471483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meert, JG, Pandit, MK, Kwafo, S and Singha, A (2023) Stinging News: ‘Dickinsonia’ discovered in the Upper Vindhyan of India Not Worth the Buzz. Gondwana Research 117, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, KM, Ridgwell, A and Payne, JL (2016) The influence of the biological pump on ocean chemistry: implications for long-term trends in marine redox chemistry, the global carbon cycle, and marine animal ecosystems. Geobiology 14(3), 207219. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12176 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misra, Y and Kumar, S (2005) Coniform stromatolites and the Vindhyan Supergroup, Central India: implication for basinal correlation and age. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 50(2), 153167.Google Scholar
Mondal, MEA, Goswami, JN, Deomurari, MP and Sharma, KK (2002) Ion microprobe 207Pb/206Pb ages of zircons from the Bundelkhand massif, northern India: implications for crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand–Aravalli protocontinent. Precambrian Research 117, 85100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00078-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, FM and Malcolm, EG (2005) The biogeochemistry of cadmium. In Metal Ions in Biological Systems (eds Sigel, A, Sigel, H & Sigel, RKO), pp. 195219. Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780824751999.ch8 Google Scholar
Morris, A (1986) Removal of trace metals in the very low salinity region of the Tamar Estuary, England. Science of the Total Environment 49, 297304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(86)90245-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, JW and Luther, GW III (1999) Chemical influences on trace metal-sulfide interactions in anoxic sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 63(19–20), 33733378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00258-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagarajan, R, Madhavaraju, J, Nagendra, R, Armstrong-Altrin, JS and Moutte, J (2007) Geochemistry of Neoproterozoic shales of the Rabanpalli Formation, Bhima Basin, Northern Karnataka, southern India: implications for provenance and paleoredox conditions. Revista mexicana de ciencias geológicas 24(2), 150160.Google Scholar
O’Connor, AE, Luek, JL, McIntosh, H and Beck, AJ (2015) Geochemistry of redox-sensitive trace elements in a shallow subterranean estuary. Marine Chemistry 172, 7081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2015.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paikaray, S, Banerjee, S and Mukherji, S (2008) Geochemistry of shales from the Paleoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup: implications on provenance, tectonics and paleoweathering. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 32, 3448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2007.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, SK (2012) Biozonation and Correlation of the Neoproterozoic Bhander Group, India. Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing. 165 pp.Google Scholar
Pandey, SK, Ahmad, S and Sharma, M (2023a) Dickinsonia tenuis reported by Retallack et al. 2021 is not a fossil, instead an impression of an extant ‘fallen beehive. Journal of the Geological Society of India 99, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, SK and Kumar, S (2013) Organic walled microbiota from the silicified Algal clasts, Bhander Limestone, Satna Area, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of the Geological Society of India 82, 499508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-013-0181-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, SK, Singh, D, Sharma, M, Ahmad, S, Bhan, U (2023b) A new palaeobiological assemblage from the Son Valley Bhander Group and its implications on the age of the upper Vindhyans of India. Palaeoworld (In Press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2023.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partin, CA, Bekker, A, Planavsky, NJ, Scott, CT, Gill, BC, Li, C, Podkovyrov, V, Maslov, A, Konhauser, KO, Lalonde, SV, Love, GD, Poulton, SW and Lyons, TW (2013) Large-scale fluctuations in Precambrian atmospheric and oceanic oxygen levels from the record of U in shales. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 369, 284293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, T and Calvert, S (1990) Anoxia vs. productivity: what controls the formation of organic-carbon-rich sediments and sedimentary rocks? AAPG Bulletin 74, 454466. https://doi.org/10.1306/0C9B232B-1710-11D7-8645000102C1865D Google Scholar
Plass, A, Schlosser, C, Sommer, S, Dale, AW, Achterberg, EP and Scholz, F (2020) The control of hydrogen sulfide on benthic iron and cadmium fluxes in the oxygen minimum zone off Peru. Biogeosciences 17(13), 36853704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, B (2007) Obruchevella and other terminal Proterozoic (Vendian) organic-walled microfossils from the Bhander Group (Vindhyan Supergroup), Madhya Pradesh. Journal of the Geological Society of India 69(2), 295310.Google Scholar
Prasad, B, Uniyal, SN and Asher, R (2005) Organic-walled microfossils from the Proterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup of Son Valley, Madhya Pradesh, India. Palaeobotanist 54(1–3), 1360. https://doi.org/10.54991/jop.2005.68 Google Scholar
Preiss, W and Forbes, B (1981) Stratigraphy, correlation and sedimentary history of Adelaidean (Late Proterozoic) basins in Australia. Precambrian Research 15, 255304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(81)90054-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, N and Morel, F (1990) Cadmium and cobalt substitution for zinc in a marine diatom. Nature 344, 658660. https://doi.org/10.1038/344658a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, V, Shukla, M and Gautam, R (1997) Discovery of carbonaceous megafossils (Chuaria-Tawuia assemblage) from the Neoproterozoic Vindhyan succession (Rewa Group), Allahabad-Rewa area, India. Current Science 73, 783788.Google Scholar
Rathore, S, Vijan, A, Krishna, B, Prabhu, B and Mishra, K (1999) Dating of glauconite from Sirbu Shale of Vindhyan Supergroup, India. Proceedings of the 3rd International Petroleum Conference on Exploration, Petrotech, Delhi, India, 191–196 pp.Google Scholar
Raven, JA and Falkowski, PG (1999) Oceanic sinks for atmospheric CO2. Plant, Cell & Environment 22, 741755. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00419.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, JS, Martin, MW, Veizer, J and Bowring, SA (2002) U-Pb zircon dating and Sr isotope systematics of the Vindhyan Supergroup, India. Geology 30, 131134. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030%3C0131:UPZDAS%3E2.0.CO;2 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, JS, Veizer, J and Davis, WJ (2003) C, O, Sr and Pb isotope systematics of carbonate sequences of the Vindhyan Supergroup, India; age, diagenesis, correlations and implications for global events. Precambrian Research 121(1–2), 103140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00223-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, CT, Planavsky, NJ, Gill, BC, Ozaki, K, Robbins, LJ, Lyons, TW, Fischer, WW, Wang, C, Cole, DB and Konhauser, KO (2017) Evolution of the global phosphorus cycle. Nature 541, 386389. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20772 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhard, CT, Planavsky, NJ, Olson, SL, Lyons, TW and Erwin, DH (2016) Earth’s oxygen cycle and the evolution of animal life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(32), 89338938. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521544113 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhard, CT, Planavsky, NJ, Robbins, LJ, Partin, CA, Gill, BC, Lalonde, SV, Bekker, A, Konhauser, KO and Lyons, TW (2013) Proterozoic ocean redox and biogeochemical stasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(14), 53575362. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208622110 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Retallack, GJ, Matthews, NA, Master, S, Khangar, RG and Khan, M (2021) Dickinsonia discovered in India and late Ediacaran biogeography. Gondwana Research 90, 165170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2020.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogov, V I, Karlova, GA, Marusin, VV, Kochnev, BB, Nagovitsin, KE and Grazhdankin, DV (2015) Duration of the first biozone in the Siberian hypostratotype of the Vendian. Russian Geology and Geophysics 56, 573583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2015.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, AD, Austermann, J, Smith, EF, Yang, L, Selby, D, Dehler, CM, Schmitz, MD, Karlstrom, KE and Macdonald, FA (2018) Coupled Re-Os and U-Pb geochronology of the Tonian Chuar Group, Grand Canyon. Geological Society of America Bulletin 130(7/8), 10851098. https://doi.org/10.1130/B31768.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Y, Lam, P, Boyle, EA and Thomson, J (1995) Authigenic cadmium enrichments in suboxic sediments: precipitation and postdepositional mobility. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 132, 99111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(95)00056-I CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudnick, RL & Gao, S (2003) Composition of the continental crust. In The Crust (ed Rudnick, RL), vol. 3 Treatise on Geochemistry (eds HD Holland & KK Turekian), pp. 164. Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043751-6/03016-4 Google Scholar
Ruttenberg, KC and Berner, RA (1993) Authigenic apatite formation and burial in sediments from non-upwelling, continental margin environments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 57(5), 9911007. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(93)90035-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahoo, SK, Planavsky, NJ, Jiang, G, Kendall, B, Owens, J, Wang, X, Shi, X, Anbar, A and Lyons, T (2016) Oceanic oxygenation events in the anoxic Ediacaran ocean. Geobiology 14, 457468. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12182 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahoo, SK, Planavsky, NJ, Kendall, B, Wang, X, Shi, X, Scott, C, Anbar, AD, Lyons, TW and Jiang, G (2012) Ocean oxygenation in the wake of the Marinoan glaciation. Nature 489, 546549. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11445 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarkar, S, Chakraborty, S, Banerjee, S and Bose, P (2002) Facies sequence and cryptic imprint of sag tectonics in late Proterozoic Sirbu Shale, central India. In Precambrian Sedimentary Environments: A Modern Approach to Ancient Depositional Systems Volume 33 (eds Alterman, W & Corcoran, PL), pp. 339350. International Association of Sedimentologists, Blackwell Science Ltd, U.K. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304312.ch17 Google Scholar
Sarmiento, JL, Gruber, N, Brzezinski, MA and Dunne, JP (2004) High-latitude controls of thermocline nutrients and low latitude biological productivity. Nature 427(6969), 5660. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02127 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sastry, MA and Moitra, A (1984) Vindhyan stratigraphy―A review. Geological Survey of India Memoir 116, 109148.Google Scholar
Schenau, SJ, Reichart, GJ and De Lange, GJ (2005) Phosphorus burial as a function of paleoproductivity and redox conditions in Arabian Sea sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 69(4), 919931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2004.05.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, M, Mishra, S, Dutta, S, Banerjee, S and Shukla, Y (2009) On the affinity of Chuaria-Tawuia Complex; a multidisciplinary study. Precambrian Research 173(1–4), 123136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2009.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, M, Pandey, SK and Kumar, S (2020) Vindhyan Basin, Son Valley Area, Central India: Field Trip Guide. New Delhi: 36th International Geological Congress (IGC). 176 pp.Google Scholar
Simpson, SL, Apte, SC and Batley, GE (1998) Effect of short-term resuspension events on trace metal speciation in polluted anoxic sediments. Environmental Science & Technology 32(5), 620625. https://doi.org/10.1021/es970568g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, AK and Chakraborty, PP (2022) Shales of Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic Vindhyan Basin, central India: insight into sedimentation dynamics of Proterozoic shelf. Geological Magazine 159(2), 247268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756820001168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, IB (1976) Depositional environment of the Upper Vindhyan sediments in the Satna–Maihar area, Madhya Pradesh and its bearing on the evolution of Vindhyan sedimentation basin. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 19, 4870.Google Scholar
Singh, VK, Babu, R and Shukla, M (2009) Discovery of carbonaceous remains from the Neoproterozoic shales of Vindhyan Supergroup, India. Journal of Evolutionary Biology Research 1(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.5897/JEBR.9000005 Google Scholar
Singh, VK, Babu, R and Shukla, M (2011) Heterolithic prokaryotes from the coated grains bearing carbonate facies of Bhander Group, Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Applied Biosciences 37, 8090.Google Scholar
Soni, MK, Chakraborty, S and Jain, VK (1987) Vindhyan Supergroup: a review. Geological Society of India Memoir 6, 87138.Google Scholar
Sperling, EA, Knoll, AH and Girguis, PR (2015) The ecological physiology of Earth’s second oxygen revolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 46, 215235. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, BN, Rana, MS and Verma, NK (1983) Geology and hydrocarbon products of the Vindhyan Basin. In Petroliferous Basins of India (eds Bhandari, LL, Venkatachala, BS, Kumar, R, Swamy, SN, Garga, P & Srivastava, DC), pp. 179189. Dehradun, India: Petroleum Asia Journal.Google Scholar
Srivastava, P (2004) Carbonaceous fossils from the Panna Shale, Rewa Group (Upper Vindhyans), Central India: A possible link between evolution from micro-megascopic life. Current Science 86(5), 644646.Google Scholar
Sulu-Gambari, F, Hagens, M, Behrends, T, Seitaj, D, Meysman, FJ, Middelburg, J and Slomp, CP (2018) Phosphorus cycling and burial in sediments of a seasonally hypoxic Marine Basin. Estuaries and coasts 41, 921939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0324-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sur, S, Schieber, J and Banerjee, S (2006) Petrographic observations suggestive of microbial mats from Rampur Shale and Bijaigarh Shale, Vindhyan Basin, India. Journal of Earth Systems Science 115, 6166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweere, T, van den Boorn, S, Dickson, AJ and Reichart, GJ (2016) Definition of new trace-metal proxies for the controls on organic matter enrichment in marine sediments based on Mn, Co, Mo and Cd concentrations. Chemical Geology 441, 235245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.08.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweere, TC, Dickson, AJ, Jenkyns, HC, Porcelli, D and Henderson, GM (2020) Zinc-and cadmium-isotope evidence for redox-driven perturbations to global micronutrient cycles during Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 (Late Cretaceous). Earth and Planetary Science Letters 546, 116427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, G (2015) Sample preparation for X-ray fluorescence analysis. Rigaku Journal 31(1), 2630.Google Scholar
Tripathy, GR and Singh, SK (2015) Re-Os depositional age for black shales from the Kaimur Group, Upper Vindhyan, India. Chemical Geology 413, 6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, BS and Baines, SB (2013) The trace metal composition of marine phytoplankton. Annual Review of Marine Science 5, 191215. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172322 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdiya, KS (1969) Stromatolites of the lesser Himalayan carbonate formations and the Vindhyans. Journal of the Geological Society of India 10(1), 125.Google Scholar
van der Weijden, CH, Reichart, GJ and van Os, BJ (2006) Sedimentary trace element records over the last 200 kyr from within and below the northern Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone. Marine Geology 231(1–4), 6988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2006.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Geen, A, McCorkle, DC and Klinkhammer, GP (1995) Sensitivity of the phosphate-cadmium-carbon isotope relation in the ocean to cadmium removal by suboxic sediments. Paleoceanography 10, 159169. https://doi.org/10.1029/94PA03352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viehmann, S, Hohl, SV, Kraemer, D, Bau, M, Walde, DH, Galer, SJ, Jiang, SY and Meister, P (2019) Metal cycling in Mesoproterozoic microbial habitats: insights from trace elements and stable Cd isotopes in stromatolites. Gondwana Research 67, 101114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2018.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M, Hendy, IL, McKay, JL and Pedersen, TF (2013) Influence of biological productivity on silver and redox-sensitive trace metal accumulation in Southern Ocean surface sediments, Pacific sector. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 380, 3140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wani, H and Mondal, M (2011) Evaluation of provenance, tectonic setting, and paleoredox conditions of the Mesoproterozoic–Neoproterozoic basins of the Bastar craton, Central Indian Shield: using petrography of sandstones and geochemistry of shales. Lithosphere 3, 143154. https://doi.org/10.1130/L74.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, P, Lyons, TW and Quinby-Hunt, MS (2004) Organic carbon proxies in black shales: molybdenum. Chemical Geology 206, 167176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyrtki, K (1962) The oxygen minima in relation to ocean circulation. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts 9(1–2), 1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(62)90243-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiang, L, Schoepfer, SD, Zhang, H, Cao, CQ and Shen, SZ (2018) Evolution of primary producers and productivity across the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition. Precambrian Research 313, 6877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, S and Laflamme, M (2009) On the eve of animal radiation: phylogeny, ecology and evolution of the Ediacara biota. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24, 3140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.015 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiong, Z, Li, T, Algeo, T, Chang, F, Yin, X and Xu, Z (2012) Rare earth element geochemistry of laminated diatom mats from tropical West Pacific: evidence for more reducing bottom waters and higher primary productivity during the Last Glacial Maximum. Chemical Geology 296, 103118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y, Feng, L, Jeffrey, PD, Shi, Y and Morel, FM (2008) Structure and metal exchange in the cadmium carbonic anhydrase of marine diatoms. Nature 452, 5661. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06636 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geological map of the Vindhyan Basin (after Krishnan & Swaminath, 1959) in and around Maihar area, Satna district. Star represents the sampling location of the Dudhiya Nala, North of Sharda Devi Temple, Maihar township.

Figure 1

Table 1. Lithostratigraphy of the Vindhyan Supergroup (modified after Sastry & Moitra, 1984; Kumar & Sharma, 2012; Sharma et al.2020)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. (a) Detailed litholog of the Sirbu Shale exposed in Dudhiya Nala Section; (b) Dudhiya Nala section, where thin layers of black to grey-coloured shale/mudstone/sandy unit of the Sirbu Shale is exposed (see yellow arrow); (c) Litho-unit B of the Sirbu Shale: papery thin green, dark grey to black coloured shale with intercalations of centimetric thin sandy layers; (d) lensoid sandy gutter cast (yellow dotted line) indicates small events of storms within Litho-unit B; (e), (f) partly sandy and light grey to green colour shale in the middle and buff colour at the top.

Figure 3

Table 2a. Trace elements (in ppm), Al, TOC, LOI (loss on ignition) (Weight%) and δ¹³C-org (in ‰) data from the Sirbu Shale samples. BM denotes before remineralization and loss denotes loss during diagenesis of Sirbu Shale

Figure 4

Table 2b. Correlation matrix (R values) among trace elements enrichment factor, Al, Mn/Al, Fe/Al, TOC, δ¹³C-org and LOI of Sirbu Shale samples

Figure 5

Table 3. The range of Th/Co and Th/Cr ratios in Sirbu Shale, felsic rocks, mafic rocks and upper continental crust

Figure 6

Fig. 3. Stratigraphic profile of VEF, CrEF, CoEF, NiEF, MoEF, CdEF, UEF, TOC, δ¹³C-org, TOCbm and TOCloss for Sirbu Shale samples.

Figure 7

Fig. 4. The cross plots of (a) δ13C versus TOC, (b) δ13C versus LOI, (c) CdEF versus δ13C, (d) CdEF versus CoEF, (e) Al versus CdEF and (f) Al versus CoEF for Sirbu Shale samples.

Figure 8

Fig. 5. The cross plots of (a) PEF versus CdEF, (b) Mn/Al versus CdEF, and (c) Fe/Al versus CdEF for Sirbu Shale samples.

Figure 9

Fig. 6. Schematic diagram of Sirbu Shale palaeodepositional environment and palaeoproductivity. B in the figure denotes the palaeodepositional position of litho-units B and C denotes the palaeodepositional position of litho-unit C in the basin.

Figure 10

Fig. 7. Mo versus Cd plot for Sirbu Shale samples with regression lines forced through the origin, representing Cd/Mo ratios for marine phytoplankton, perennial upwelling, seasonal upwelling, and weakly restricted conditions. This figure is adapted from Sweere et al. (2016).

Supplementary material: File

Ansari et al. supplementary material

Ansari et al. supplementary material

Download Ansari et al. supplementary material(File)
File 50.7 KB