Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:49:05.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Junior doctors' strange love of information technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

M. Abbas
Affiliation:
Peter Hodgkinson Centre, County Hospital, Lincoln LN2 5UA, e-mail [email protected]
R. Kiani
Affiliation:
Peter Hodgkinson Centre, County Hospital, Lincoln LN2 5UA, e-mail [email protected]
A. Thompson
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Trust, Lincoln
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2005

Dr Holloway (Psychiatric Bulletin, July 2005, 29, 241–243) suggests that the education of the current generation of psychiatric trainees has emphasised information technology skills which psychiatrists of an older generation may be reluctant to embrace. A survey of 75 mental health doctors in Lincolnshire with a response rate of 64% (n=48, 38 males, 10 females, mean age=41 years, s.d.=10) confirmed that the overall knowledge of information technology was better among senior house officers (SHOs) and specialist registrars (SpRs) (n=18, 37.5%) than consultants and staff grade doctors (n=30, 62.5%). For example, 17 out of 18 SHOs and SpRs (94%) rated their knowledge of PowerPoint as good to excellent compared with 13 out of 30 consultants and staff grade doctors (43%; P<0.001). Significant statistical differences were found between the two groups in the use of Excel (61 v. 29%, P=0.05) and searching medical databases (89 v. 60%, P=0.049). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the use of Word (94 v. 76%) and Outlook Express (72 v. 67%). Use of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences was limited in both groups (33 v. 20%). Consultants and staff grades did, however, use the trust’s electronic patient information system more frequently than junior doctors (43 v. 17%). Perhaps the eventual introduction of electronic care records will lead any remaining reluctant psychiatrists into the information age.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.