Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:30:09.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Serum-soluble suppression of tumourigenicity-2 as a biomarker in children with congestive heart failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2023

Eslam Amer
Affiliation:
Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt
Doaa El Amrousy*
Affiliation:
Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt
Sahar Hazaa
Affiliation:
Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt
Amr Zoair
Affiliation:
Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt
*
Author for correspondence: Doaa El Amrousy, MD Pediatrics, Professor of Pediatrics, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta, Egypt. Tel: +201289022229; Fax: +20403280477. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

We aimed to evaluate serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in children with congestive heart failure, to assess the diagnostic and prognostic values of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in these patients, and to correlate its levels with various clinical and echocardiographic data.

Methods:

We included 60 children with congestive heart failure as the patient group. Sixty healthy children of matched age and sex served as the control group. Patients were evaluated clinically and by echocardiography. Serum level of suppression of tumorigenicity-2 was measured for patients at admission. All patients were followed up for death or readmission for a period of one year.

Results:

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 was significantly higher in children with congestive heart failure as compared to the control group. Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 was significantly increased in patients with higher severity of congestive heart failure. There was a significant increase in soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in patients with bad prognosis compared to those with good prognosis. There was a significant positive correlation between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and respiratory rate, heart rate, and clinical stage of congenital heart failure, while there was a significant negative correlation between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. The best cut-off of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 to diagnose congestive heart failure was > 3.6 with 87% sensitivity and 79% specificity. The cut-off point of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 to diagnose congestive heart failure in children was ≥ 31.56 ng/ml, with 95% sensitivity and 91.37% specificity. Moreover, the cut-off point of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 to predict bad prognosis in children with congestive heart failure was ≥ 255.5 ng/ml, with 92% sensitivity and 89.0% specificity.

Conclusion:

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 is a good diagnostic and predictive biomarker in children with congestive heart failure.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Congestive heart failure is still a major problem in paediatrics despite the great improvements in diagnosis and treatment.Reference Cleland, Khand and Clark1 Congestive heart failure is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.Reference El Amrousy, Hodeib, Suliman, Hablas, Salama and Esam2 The pathology and aetiology of paediatric HF are different from those of adult HF. CHD and cardiomyopathy are the leading causes of HF in children, as opposed to ischaemic heart diseases in adults.Reference Cleland, Khand and Clark1 Assessing prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure is difficult, and this may lead to an incorrect treatment strategy.Reference El Amrousy, Abdelhai and Nassar3 Therefore, finding novel biomarkers to identify high-risk patients who will need more intense treatment protocols is urgently needed.

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2, a member of the interleukin receptor superfamily, is involved in a variety of biological processes that are connected to cardiovascular diseases.Reference El Amrousy, Abdelhai and Nassar3Reference Sharim and Daniels4 Suppression of tumorigenicity-2 is secreted by cardiac myocytes, vascular endothelial cells, and fibroblasts and is increased in response to cardiac mechanical injury.Reference Ky, French and McCloskey5Reference Kakkar and Lee6 In both acute and chronic heart failure conditions, elevated levels of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 have been linked to increased mortality.Reference Sharim and Daniels4Reference Aimo, Vergaro and Ripoli7 Since myocardial fibrosis and remodelling are closely related to soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2, it has been determined that soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 is a reliable prognostic biomarker for chronic heart failure in adults.Reference Aimo, Januzzi and Bayes-Genis8 When assessed serially, suppression of tumorigenicity-2’s predictive value for mortality in heart failure is improved.Reference Boisot, Beede and Isakson9Reference Tang, Wu and Grodin11 These findings have led to the recognition of suppression of tumorigenicity-2 as a potentially valuable biomarker for heart failure patient risk classification in adults.Reference Yancy, Jessup and Bozkurt12

However, the role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in paediatric patients with acute heart failure is still debatable,Reference Aimo, Maisel, Castiglione and Emdin13 particularly the cut-off for suppression of tumorigenicity-2 concentration and its relationship to the prognosis of acute HF.Reference Parikh, Seliger, Christenson, Gottdiener, Psaty and deFilippi14Reference Aimo, Vergaro and Passino15 Therefore, we performed this study to evaluate soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in children with congenital heart failure, to assess the diagnostic and prognostic values of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in these patients and to correlate its levels with various clinical and echocardiographic data.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was performed at the Pediatric Department, Tanta University during the period from October 2020 to March 2022 on sixty children with congenital heart failure due to cardiac causes as the patient group. Sixty healthy children matched for age and sex served as the control group; they were chosen from those attending a “well-child” clinic. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the faculty of medicine, Tanta University. Written informed consent was signed by all parents of the included children.

Inclusion criteria: Children aged less than 18 years diagnosed with congenital heart failure due to congenital or acquired heart diseases.

Exclusion criteria: children with history of systemic disease such as diabetes, uraemia, rheumatic fever, Kawasaki disease, hypertension, systemic lupus erythematosus, or chronic liver disease, children with sepsis, children with systemic inflammatory illness, neonates, and children with chronic pulmonary diseases.

Detailed history taking and complete clinical examination including anthropometric measurements, heart rate, respiratory rate, clinical assessment of severity of heart failure according to Ross classification of congenital heart failure, and complete local cardiac examination were recorded.

Echocardiography: was performed using vivid 7 ultrasound machine (GE medical system, Norway), with 3.5 and 7 MHz multi-frequency transducer. Doppler, two-dimensional, M-mode, and tissue Doppler echocardiographic evaluation was done for evaluation of these parameters:

-Cardiac causes of congenital heart failure.

-Systolic function of left ventricle: The left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and left ventricular end-systolic dimension were measured. LV fractional shortening (LV FS%) was obtained from M-mode tracings in the parasternal long-axis view at the tips of the mitral valve leaflets or in the parasternal short-axis view at the level of the papillary muscles. LV FS% is calculated using the following equation: FS (%) = (LVEDD – LVESD/LVEDD) × 100.

LV ejection fraction (LV EF%) was calculated by the biplane measurement of left ventricular volumes from the apical four-chamber and two-chamber views. LV EF% was calculated using the following equation: EF (%) = (LVEDV – LVESV/LVEDV) × 100.

Peak mitral annular systolic velocity (S') using tissue Doppler echocardiography.

-Diastolic function of left ventricle: Peak early filling velocity (E wave) and peak late filling velocity (A wave) were measured and mitral E/A ratio was calculated (by pulsed transmitral Doppler). The ratio of mitral early to late annular diastolic velocity (E'/A' ratio) was also measured by tissue Doppler imaging.

-Calibrated integrated backscatter measurement of myocardial fibrosis: Calculation of calibrated integrated backscatter measurements of tissue intensity was obtained from sample volumes placed within the pericardium, posterior wall, and anteroseptum (green) in a parasternal long-axis view. A resultant integrated backscatter curve was derived with standard commercial software (Echopac, General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) which enables calibrated integrated backscatter to be calculated by subtracting mean pericardial integrated backscatter intensity from mean integrated backscatter intensity of the posterior wall or anteroseptum at end diastole.Reference Mizuno, Fujimoto, Saito and Nakamura16

Serum level of soluble suppression of tumourigenicity-2: 3 ml venous blood sample was drawn from each patient in tubes containing ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA). Samples were allowed to clot for 30 minutes before centrifugation for 10 minutes at approximately 3000 RPM. Samples were stored at −20°C .Serum level of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 was detected using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test (Sunredbio, Shanghai, China).Reference Wu, Wians and Jaffe17

Echocardiographic examination and laboratory investigations were performed at the same time of admission. Patients were classified according to modified Ross classifications of heart failure in infants and children to class I, II, III, and IV.Reference Masarone, Valente and Rubino18

Patients were followed up for 1 year for adverse outcomes such as mortality and re-admission to the hospital. Good prognosis was defined as no mortality or readmission during the period of follow-up, while poor prognosis was defined as the occurrence of death or readmission during the period of follow up.

The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels in children with congenital heart failure. The secondary outcomes were to assess the diagnostic and predictive values of suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in these patients and to correlate its levels with clinical and echocardiographic data in these children.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V.20. For normally distributed quantitative data, the mean and standard deviation were calculated. For qualitative data, number and percentages were calculated. Comparison of qualitative data between two groups was performed using Chi-square test (χ2). Comparison of the means between the two groups was performed using Student t-test. For comparison of the mean between more than two groups, one way analysis of variance test was used. Correlation between variables was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). The Receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to detect the diagnostic and predictive values of suppression of tumorigenicity-2 at different cut-off points. p < 0.05 is considered significant.

Results

The study included 60 children with congenital heart failure with a mean age of 6.4 ± 1.2 y; they were 32 male and 28 female. Sixty healthy control children had a mean age of 7.2 ± 1.8 y; they were 30 male and 30 female. The cause of congenital heart failure in patient group was due to dilated cardiomyopathy in 38 patients (63.3%) and CHD in 22 patients (36.7%). Patients with CHD was diagnosed as; 7 patients with ventricular septal defect, 5 patients with patent ductus arteriosus, 5 patients with complete atrioventricular canal, 3 patients with transposition of great arteries, and 2 patients with coarctation of aorta. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups as regards to age, sex, or height. While there was a significantly lower weight in children with congenital heart failure compared to the healthy control. Heart rate and respiratory rate were significantly higher in children with congenital heart failure compared to the healthy control group. Suppression of tumorigenicity-2 was significantly higher in children with congenital heart failure (181 ± 16.5) compared to the control group (20.6 ± 8.6). LVEF%, LVFS%, mitral E/A ratio, mitral S’, mitral E’/A’ ratio, and cIB were significantly lower in patients with congenital heart failure as compared to the control group (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic data of the studied groups

* means significant, NS: non-significant; HR: heart rate; RR: respiratory rate; CHF: congestive heart failure; sST2: soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVFS: left ventricular fractional shortening.

Table (2) shows that suppression of tumorigenicity-2 was significantly higher in patients with Ross class IV (239.1 ± 19.4) compared to those with class III (172.5 ± 11.2) and class II (138 ± 19.4), p = 0.001.

There was a statistically significant positive correlation between suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and heart rate, respiratory rate, modified Ross classification of heart failure, and calibrated integrated backscatter. However, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between ST2 and both age, LV EF, LV FS%, mitral E/A ratio, mitral S’, and mitral E’/A’ ratio (Table 3).

Table 2. sST2 in different modified Ross classification in the patient group

* means significant, sST2: soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2.

Table 3. Correlation between sST2 and other variables in children with CHF

r: coefficient correlation, *: Statically significant at p ≤ 0.05, sST2: soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2; HR: heart rate; RR: respiratory rate; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVFS: left ventricular fraction shortening.

During the period of follow-up, 18 out of 60 patients (30%) with congenital heart failure had unfavourable prognoses in the form of death and readmission. Suppression of tumorigenicity-2 was significantly higher in patients with poor prognosis (245.3 ± 8.17) compared with those with good prognosis (142.2 ± 6.17), p = 0.001 (Table 4).

Table 4. sST2 in children with good and bad prognosis in the patient group

* Statically significant at p ≤ 0.05, sST2: soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2.

The cut-off point of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 to diagnose congenital heart failure in children was ≥ 31.56 ng/ml, with 95% sensitivity, 91.37% specificity, 94.4% positive predictive value (PPV), 89.9% negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) was 0.718. (Fig 1). Moreover, the cut-off point of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 to predict bad prognosis in children with congenital heart failure was ≥255.5 ng/ml, with 92% sensitivity, 89.0% specificity, 92.9% PPV, 88.2% NPV, and AUC was 0.628 (Fig 2).

Figure 1. ROC curve for ST2 to diagnose CHF in children.

Figure 2. ROC curve for ST2 to predict adverse outcome in children with CHF.

Regarding the follow-up of patients prognosis, Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed that patients with soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 >278.2 ng/ml had a higher rate of mortality (Fig 3).

Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis to predict mortality in patients with CHF.

Discussions

The results of the current study showed that soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels were significantly higher in children with congenital heart failure compared to the control group. These results are in agreement with the results of other investigators.Reference Abdel Raheem and Sedik19. Suppression of tumorigenicity-2 is present in two isoforms; the soluble form (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2) and the transmembrane form (ST2L). ST2L binds IL-33 in response to cardiac injury, an interaction that results in antihypertrophic, antifibrotic, and antiapoptotic effects. A soluble form of suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2) competes with the membrane-bound form for binding with interleukin-33 preventing its cardioprotective effects. Hence, elevated levels of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 are associated with the presence and severity of adverse cardiac remodelling and fibrosis.Reference Larsen, Minaya, Vaish and Peña20Reference Iannazzo, Pellicano and Colalillo22 When the ventricular volume load increases significantly over a short period of time and cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts secrete an excessive amount of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and ST2L in response to stress stimulation, acute decompensated heart failure results.Reference Iannazzo, Pellicano and Colalillo22

The current study also revealed that patients with Ross class IV HF classification had significantly higher serum levels of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 than those with Ross class III and Ross class II. These results point at the role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in evaluating the severity of heart failure. This is in agreement with the results of Wang et al.Reference Wang, Pan and Xu23

Moreover, our study revealed that the cut-off point of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 to diagnose congenital heart failure in children was ≥31.56 ng/ml, with 95% sensitivity and 91.37% specificity. These results are in agreement with the results of Miftode et al.Reference Miftode, Constantinescu and Cianga24 who reported that soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 provides similar diagnostic value as NT-proBNP, with high sensitivity and specificity, but it is emerging as a more valuable prognostic factor, with a better predictive value of fatal events in patients with acute heart failure.

Elevated soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 may have detrimental effects on myocardial remodelling by inhibiting interleukin-33 cardioprotective function. Xia et al.Reference Xia, Qu, Yin and Xu25 observed a positive correlation between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels and aldosterone levels, and it was shown that increased mineralocorticoid receptor activation in cardiac fibroblasts was linked to heart failure. This was observed in our study as significant positive correlation between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels and calibrated integrated backscatter that reflected myocardial fibrosis in HF.Reference Xia, Qu, Yin and Xu25

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels were found to be negatively correlated with echocardiographic parameters of both systolic and diastolic function of the heart, which reflects the role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in the pathogenesis of heart failure. Furthermore, the significant positive correlation between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels and modified Ross HF class may indicate the relationship between the severity of heart failure and increased soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels. Other investigators have confirmed these findings, indicating that the stress on the cardiomyocytes causes soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels to rise in both acute and chronic heart failure.Reference Sanada, Hakuno, Higgins, Schreiter, McKenzie and Lee26Reference Ponikowska, Iwanek and Zdanowicz27

The present study showed that patients with bad prognosis had significantly higher levels of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 than those with good prognosis. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels higher than 255.5 ng/ml is predictive of bad prognosis in children with congenital heart failure with 92% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Similar results were obtained by Dalal et al.Reference Dalal, Digrajkar, Das, Bansal, Toomu and Maisel28 Moreover, Biasucci et al.Reference Biasucci, Maino, Grimaldi, Cappannoli and Aspromonte29 found that soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with acute dyspnoea. This includes mortality due to cardiac and pulmonary disease.

Interestingly, Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed that patients with soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 >278.2 ng/ml had a higher rate of mortality. Similarly, Kanagala et al.Reference Kanagala, Arnold and Singh30 evaluated the value of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 and reported that soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 was the strongest predictor of death in the first 6 months of follow-up in patients with heart failure.

In the light of our results, elevated levels of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in patients with congenital heart failure may signify patients who are at substantially higher risk for adverse outcomes and increased use of healthcare resources beyond what would be expected from their clinical profile alone. Patients with elevated soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels probably warrant closer follow-up and more intensive treatment strategy even after discharge from the hospitals as they have a substantially higher rate of re-hospitalisation or death. Further future studies need to focus on how to best use the information provided by soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2. For example, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 is a marker of fibrosis, among other properties. Therefore, agents with antifibrotic properties, e.g. mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may provide more benefit for patients with elevated soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 levels.Reference Zannad, Gattis and Rossignol31

There are some important limitations on this study. First, being a single centre study, hence a multicentre study is needed to confirm our conclusions. Second, short duration of follow-up. Third, serial measurements of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 were not performed. However, our findings are useful and may be used with additional heart failure indicators in future studies to enhance the evaluation and management of paediatric patients with congenital heart failure.

Conclusion

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 can be used as a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in children with congenital heart failure.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national guidelines on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008, and has been approved by the institutional committees of Faculty of medicine, Tanta University.

References

Cleland, JG, Khand, A, Clark, A. The heart failure epidemic: exactly how big is it? Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 623626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Amrousy, D, Hodeib, H, Suliman, G, Hablas, N, Salama, ER, Esam, A. Diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma levels of cardiac myosin binding protein-C as a novel biomarker in heart failure. Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 38: 418424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Amrousy, D, Abdelhai, D, Nassar, M. Predictive value of plasma copeptin level in children with acute heart failure. Pediatr Cardiol 2022; 43: 17371742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharim, J, Daniels, LB. Soluble ST2 and soluble markers of fibrosis: emerging roles for prognosis and guiding therapy. Curr Cardiol Rep 2020; 22: 41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ky, B, French, B, McCloskey, K, et al. High-sensitivity ST2 for prediction of adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 2011; 4: 180187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kakkar, R, Lee, RT. The IL-33/ST2 pathway: therapeutic target and novel biomarker. Nat. Rev Drug Discov 2008; 7: 827840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aimo, A, Vergaro, G, Ripoli, A, et al. Prognostic value of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. JACC Heart Fail 2017; 5: 280286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aimo, A, Januzzi, JL Jr, Bayes-Genis, A, et al. Clinical and prognostic significance of sST2 in heart failure: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74: 21932203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boisot, S, Beede, J, Isakson, S, et al. Serial sampling of ST2 predicts 90-day mortality following destabilized heart failure. J Card Fail 2008; 14: 732738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaggin, HK, Szymonifka, J, Bhardwaj, A, et al. Head-to-head comparison of serial soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and highly-sensitive troponin T measurements in patients with chronic heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2014; 2: 6572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, WH, Wu, Y, Grodin, JL, et al. Prognostic value of baseline and changes in circulating soluble ST2 levels and the effects of nesiritide in acute decompensated heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2016; 4: 6877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yancy, CW, Jessup, M, Bozkurt, B, et al. ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 2017; 136: e137e161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aimo, A, Maisel, AS, Castiglione, V, Emdin, M. sST2 for outcome prediction in acute heart failure: which is the best cutoff? J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74: 478479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parikh, RH, Seliger, SL, Christenson, R, Gottdiener, JS, Psaty, BM, deFilippi, CR. Soluble ST2 for prediction of heart failure and cardiovascular death in an elderly, community-dwelling population. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: e003188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aimo, A, Vergaro, G, Passino, C, et al. Prognostic value of soluble suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. JACC Heart Fail 2017; 5: 280286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mizuno, R, Fujimoto, S, Saito, Y, Nakamura, S. Non –invasive quantitation of myocardial fibrosis using integrated backscatter analysis in dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiology 2007; 108: 1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, AH, Wians, F, Jaffe, A. Biological variation of galectin-3 and soluble ST2 for chronic heart failure: implication on interpretation of test results. Am Heart J 2013; 165: 9959–999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masarone, D, Valente, F, Rubino, M, et al. Pediatric heart failure: a practical guide to diagnosis and management. Pediatr Neonatol 2017; 58: 303312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdel Raheem, M, Sedik, WF. Prognostic value of soluble ST2 (sST2) serum levels in infants and children with heart failure complicating congenital heart disease. Int J Pediatr 2019; 7: 94719480.Google Scholar
Larsen, KM, Minaya, MK, Vaish, V, Peña, MMO. The role of IL-33/ST2 pathway in tumorigenesis. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19: 2676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pascual-Figal, DA, Januzzi, JL. The biology of ST2: the international ST2 consensus panel. Am J Cardiol 2015; 115: 3B7B.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iannazzo, F, Pellicano, C, Colalillo, A, et al. Interleukin-33 and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 in scleroderma cardiac involvement. Clin Exp Med 2022; 10: 21203.Google Scholar
Wang, Z, Pan, X, Xu, H, et al. Serum soluble ST2 is a valuable prognostic biomarker in patients with acute heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 10: 812654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miftode, RS, Constantinescu, D, Cianga, CM, et al. A novel paradigm based on ST2 and its contribution towards a multimarker approach in the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure: a prospective study during the pandemic storm. Life 2021; 11: 1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xia, J, Qu, Y, Yin, C, Xu, D. Preliminary study of beta-blocker therapy on modulation of interleukin-33/ST2 signaling during ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. Cardiol J 2017; 24: 188194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanada, S, Hakuno, D, Higgins, LJ, Schreiter, ER, McKenzie, ANJ, Lee, RT. IL-33 and ST2 comprise a critical biomechanically induced and cardioprotective signaling system. J Clin Investig 2007; 117: 15381549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponikowska, B, Iwanek, G, Zdanowicz, A, et al. Biomarkers of myocardial injury and remodeling in heart failure. J Personal Med 2022; 12: 799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalal, JJ, Digrajkar, A, Das, B, Bansal, M, Toomu, A, Maisel, AS. ST2 elevation in heart failure, predictive of a high early mortality. Indian Heart J 2018; 70: 822827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biasucci, LM, Maino, A, Grimaldi, MC, Cappannoli, L, Aspromonte, N. Novel biomarkers in heart failure: new insight in pathophysiology and clinical perspective. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 2771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanagala, P, Arnold, JR, Singh, A. Characterizing heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: an imaging and plasma biomarker approach. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0232280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zannad, F, Gattis, SW, Rossignol, P, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: integrating evidence into clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 27822795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic data of the studied groups

Figure 1

Table 2. sST2 in different modified Ross classification in the patient group

Figure 2

Table 3. Correlation between sST2 and other variables in children with CHF

Figure 3

Table 4. sST2 in children with good and bad prognosis in the patient group

Figure 4

Figure 1. ROC curve for ST2 to diagnose CHF in children.

Figure 5

Figure 2. ROC curve for ST2 to predict adverse outcome in children with CHF.

Figure 6

Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis to predict mortality in patients with CHF.