Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:50:38.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High catalytic performance of Fe-rich palygorskite clay-supported Ni catalysts for steam reforming of toluene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2023

Minghao Ji ,
Xuehua Zou ,
Haibo Liu ,
Yinsheng Zhang ,
Shiwei Dong ,
Chengrui Xu ,
Qiaoqin Xie ,
Dong Chen ,
Chengzhu Zhu  and
Tianhu Chen
Minghao Ji
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Xuehua Zou*
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Haibo Liu
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Yinsheng Zhang
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Shiwei Dong
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Chengrui Xu
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Qiaoqin Xie
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Dong Chen
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Chengzhu Zhu
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Tianhu Chen*
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Minerals and Materials, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Key Laboratory of Nano-minerals and Pollution Control of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China Institute of Atmospheric Environment & Pollution Control Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
*
*Email: [email protected]
*Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development and application of Fe-rich palygorskite clay has been restricted significantly by its red colour and low grade. Moreover, the nano-structured properties of palygorskite and the relatively large Fe content of Fe-rich palygorskite clay have received insufficient attention. The present study involved the synthesis of Ni-based catalysts via a coprecipitation method using Fe-rich palygorskite clay as the support. The catalysts were then evaluated for their performance for catalytic steam reforming of toluene (CSRT). The experimental findings revealed that the Fe in Fe-rich palygorskite clay interacted strongly with Ni and formed Fe-Ni alloys. The catalyst with a Ni/Fe mass ratio of 14 (Ni14/FePal) calcined in air at 600°C exhibited superior performance for CSRT under the reaction temperature 700°C and S/C molar ratio of 1.0. According to the kinetics study, Ni14/FePal exhibited the lowest apparent activation energy (33.99 kJ mol−1) among the catalysts, which further confirmed the superior catalytic activity in CSRT. The characterizations of the catalysts used demonstrated that the excellent stability and resistance to coke formation of Ni14/FePal were attributable to the presence of a sufficient amount of highly dispersed Fe-Ni alloys on its surface.

Keywords

Biomass tarFe-Ni alloysFe-rich palygorskite claysteam reformingtoluene
Type
Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 2023 , pp. 67 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland

Introduction

Because it is renewable, widely available and easily transported, biomass energy has attracted wide attention (Gan et al., Reference Gan, Niu, Qu and Zhou2022; Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Zhou, Dai, Deng, Liu, Cheng, Liu, Cobb, Chen and Ruan2021). Among common conversion technologies, biomass gasification is a prospective technique to produce syngas and other valuable chemicals (Ashok et al., Reference Ashok, Dewangan, Das, Hongmanorom, Wai, Tomishige and Kawi2020; Ren et al., Reference Ren, Yang and Liu2021a). However, tar formation presents a significant challenge for the further development of biomass gasification (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Xiong, Fang, Li, Li and Li2020a). For example, tar condensation can damage downstream equipment, form carbon deposits and increase the cost of biomass gasification. Thus, effective removal of tar is needed before syngas utilization (Ashok & Kawi, Reference Ashok and Kawi2013; He et al., Reference He, Hu, Yin, Xu, Han, Li, Ren, Su, Wang and Xiang2020; Zou et al., Reference Zou, Chen, Zhang, Chen, He, Dang, Ma, Chen, Toloueinia, Zhu, Xie, Liu and Suib2018).

Recently, catalytic reforming has received significant attention for its ability to effectively remove tar during biomass gasification. Many metal-supported catalysts, such as Ni (Ren et al., Reference Ren, Cao, Yang, Liu, Tang and Zhao2021b), Co (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Li, Watanabe, Tamura, Nakagawa and Tomishige2014), Fe (Adnan et al., Reference Adnan, Muraza, Razzak, Hossain and de Lasa2017), Pt (Furusawa et al., Reference Furusawa, Saito, Kori, Miura, Sato and Suzuki2013), and Rh (Mei et al., Reference Mei, Lebarbier, Rousseau, Glezakou, Albrecht, Kovarik, Flake and Dagle2013), have been reported as being effective at removing tar because of their ability to cleave C–C and C–H bonds (Ren et al., Reference Ren, Cao, Zhao, Wei, Zhu and Wei2017). Ni-based catalysts have attracted wide interest because of their catalytic activity and low cost compared to other catalysts (Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Chen, Gong, Wang, Zhu and Zhou2020). Nevertheless, there are serious problems with Ni sintering in addition to coke deposition during the process. To solve these problems, some transition metals (Fe, Ce, Rh, Co) are usually introduced (Asadullah et al., Reference Asadullah, Miyazawa, Ito, Kunimori, Koyama and Tomishige2004; Kathiraser et al., Reference Kathiraser, Ashok and Kawi2016; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Li, Koike, Watanabe, Xu, Nakagawa and Tomishige2013). Previous studies have indicated that Fe-Ni bimetallic catalysts perform well in catalytic reforming of biomass tars (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Zou, Liu, Chen, Dong, Ji, Chen, Xu, Xie, Zhu, Suib and Chen2022; Zou et al., Reference Zou, Chen, Zhang, Chen, He, Dang, Ma, Chen, Toloueinia, Zhu, Xie, Liu and Suib2018). The formation of Fe-Ni alloys can significantly improve the oxygen coverage on the catalyst surface, accelerate the conversion of carbon intermediates and inhibit the generation of carbon accumulation (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Yuan and Ji2011).

Proper support is essential for enhancing the catalytic activities of catalysts (Dong et al., Reference Dong, Chen, Xu, Liu, Wang, Zhang, Ji, Xu, Zhu, Li and Zou2022). A good support for catalytic steam reforming reactions should have a large specific surface area, strong interaction with active metals, and provide acidic or basic centres (Ashok et al., Reference Ashok, Dewangan, Das, Hongmanorom, Wai, Tomishige and Kawi2020). These advantages are conducive to preventing metal sintering and coke deposition during the CSRT process. Recently, the use of natural mineral materials has attracted significant attention for biomass tar conversion because of their superior physicochemical properties, special structures, low cost and wide availability (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Chen, Liu, Zhang, Wang, Dong, Chen, Xie, Zou, Suib and Li2020; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Chang, Chen, He, Yuan, Xie and Frost2013; Mekki et al., Reference Mekki, Mokhtar, Hachemaoui, Beldjilali, Meliani, Zahmani, Hacini and Boukoussa2021; Xue et al., Reference Xue, Guo, Liu and Chen2018; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Shen, Liu and Liu2011). Palygorskite (Pal), an aluminium-magnesium silicate clay mineral, has shown great potential as a catalyst support in the environmental catalysis field (Ezzatahmadi et al., Reference Ezzatahmadi, Millar, Ayoko, Zhu, Zhu, Liang, He and Xi2019; Santanna et al., Reference Santanna, Silva, Silva and Castro Dantas2020). Previous studies have shown that Pal clay-supported Fe-Ni (Fe-Ni/Pal) catalysts displayed distinguished capabilities in toluene reforming. Fe-Ni alloys were well distributed on the surface of Pal and exhibited high reactivity for toluene conversion (Zou et al., Reference Zou, Chen, Zhang, Chen, He, Dang, Ma, Chen, Toloueinia, Zhu, Xie, Liu and Suib2018). However, most of the Pal clays used in the studies above needed a complicated purification process.

In fact, the low-grade Pal clay ore has large reserves around the world but without effective development and utilization. The Pal clay with red color is one of the low-grade Pal clays, which is widely distributed in Linze, Gansu province, China. Previous studies have demonstrated that the reason for the red color of Pal clay should be ascribed to the existence of iron oxides and the substituted iron in the Pal structure (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Zhang, Wang and Wang2022). The proportion of iron oxides and/or the substituted iron in red-colored Pal clay could account for 4–8 wt.% (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Zhang, Wang and Wang2022; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wang, Tian, Wang and Wang2018). This red-colored Pal clay with relatively large Fe content is referred to here as Fe-rich Pal (FePal). Recently, researchers have been attempting to decolorize the FePal to develop its potential uses (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Xiong, Fang, Li, Li and Li2020a; Lu et al., Reference Lu, Zhang, Wang and Wang2022; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wang, Kang, Wang and Wang2018). However, a rare study related to the utilization of raw FePal has been reported (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wang, Kang, Wang and Wang2018). Therefore, a facile and environmentally friendly strategy to use the raw FePal was proposed. FePal was employed as a supporting material to synthesize FePal-supported Ni catalysts (Nix/FePal) for CSRT. The iron oxides and/or the substituted iron in FePal can be used directly as the iron precursor to avoid the addition of chemical ferric salts. And only nickel salts were needed in this catalyst system.

Herein, Nix/FePal catalysts were prepared by using the raw FePal as a support for CSRT. The main aims were: (1) to verify the Nix/FePal catalysts for CSRT; (2) to reveal the interaction between Ni and the Fe in Fe-rich Pal clay; and (3) to explore the possible deactivation reasons for the catalyst during the CSRT process.

Experimental

Catalyst preparation

The raw FePal obtained from Linze, Gansu Province, was crushed and ground into particles of <0.075 mm. According to the XRF measurement, the constituents of raw FePal were SiO2 55.12 wt.%, Al2O3 18.20 wt.%, Fe2O3 7.07 wt.%, MgO 2.91 wt.%, CaO 2.59 wt.%, K2O 3.93 wt.%, and others 2.6 wt.%. The loss on ignition was 7.58 wt.%. Nix/FePal catalysts (x indicates the mass fraction of Ni) with varying Ni loadings (3%, 9%, 14%, 17%) were synthesized via the coprecipitation method. The Fe content of the raw FePal was ~5%, and the mass ratios of Fe/Ni in Nix/FePal catalysts were 5:3, 5:9, 5:14 and 5:17, respectively. After stirring, aging, centrifugation and drying, the acquired samples were ground into small particles (0.85–0.425 mm), the samples obtained were subsequently subjected to calcination in air at various temperatures for 2 h and labelled as Nix/FePal-T (T stands for calcination temperature (CT)). The aforementioned samples were subjected to in-situ reduction in H2 at 700°C for 2 h prior to the CSRT reaction.

Analytical methods

A Shimadzu XRF-1800 instrument (Japan) was used to analyze the chemical composition of the raw FePal material, using Rh radiation. The samples were calcined at 800°C in air to calculate the loss on ignition before the XRF test. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted on both fresh and used catalysts utilizing a Dandong DS-2700 diffractometer. The porous properties of the catalysts were determined using a Nova 3000e analyzer (USA). Temperature-programmed reduction by H2 (H2-TPR) was conducted using an AutoChem Ⅱ 2920 analyzer (USA). Analysis of the formation of carbonaceous species was conducted via Raman spectroscopy using a LabRAM HR Evolution instrument (France). The coke content was assessed utilizing a thermogravimetric analyzer (TG, Germany). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using an Hitachi SU8020 (Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was conducted using a JEM-1400 flash microscope (Japan).

Experimental system

The CSRT reaction system is illustrated in Fig. 1. To begin the experiment, 0.3 g of catalyst was added to a quartz tube and reduced in a hydrogen atmosphere at a temperature of 700°C for 2 h. The residual H2 was removed with Ar. After that, the desired reaction temperature (500–800°C) was set on the furnace and kept stable until the end of the CSRT experiments. Toluene (3000 ppm) and water (0–42000 ppm) were injected into the pipeline using syringe pumps and mixed thoroughly in a gas mixing tank. The heating tape set to a temperature of 60°C was employed to keep the gas mixture in a gaseous state throughout the reaction. The mixed gases were introduced into the quartz tube to trigger the reactions after the initial concentration of toluene was stable. During the reaction process, the GHSV (gas hourly space velocity) was maintained at a constant value of 17,052 h–1. The composition of the gaseous products was determined by a gas chromatograph (9790II). Toluene conversion, gas yields, gaseous product distributions and the molar ratios of H2/CO were computed based on Eqs S1–S6 (given in the Supplementary Information, SI).

Figure 1. The CSRT reaction system.

Results

Analysis of the catalysts

The XRD patterns of Ni14/FePal calcined in air at various temperatures are shown in Fig. S1. The peaks at 20.9, 26.7, 50.2, 60.0 and 68.0°2θ were attributed to quartz and the peak at 27.9°2θ was attributed to feldspar. According to previous studies, quartz is generally considered to be an inert material and has no almost influence on catalytic performance (Zou et al., Reference Zou, Chen, Liu, Zhang, Ma, Xie and Chen2017). The peaks at 8.6 and 34.9°2θ were attributed to palygorskite in raw FePal (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Gainey, Wang, Mackinnon and Xi2022), while these reflection peaks almost disappeared after calcination at high temperature, indicating that the structure of Pal was destroyed (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Zhao, Zhong and Jin2011). Although a certain amount of iron existed in FePal, no independent phases of iron oxides were observed. This indicated that the iron oxides in FePal were dispersive or below the XRD detection limit. It was worth noting that awaruite (Fe-Ni alloy) was observed at 44.2°2θ (111) and 51.6°2θ (200) in reduced catalysts (Fig. 2a and Fig. 2b), which indicated that Ni interacted strongly with Fe in FePal. In addition, the reflection peaks of awaruite became narrower as the CT and Ni content increased, which indicated the enhancement in crystallinity of awaruite.

Figure 2. XRD patterns of catalysts. Ni14/FePal heat treated in air at various temperatures (a) and Nix/FePal heat treated in air at 600°C (b), and subsequently reduced in H2 at 700°C.

SEM and TEM images of the raw FePal and freshly reduced Nix/FePal catalysts are shown in Fig. 3. Fe, Mg, Al and Si were very dispersed in FePal as shown in the mapping images (Fig. 3a). The characteristic rod-like morphology of Pal is shown Fig. 3b. Even though Pal reflections disappeared after calcination at high temperatures, the original morphology of Pal still could be observed in Fig. 3c. This is as observed in previous studies also (Boudriche et al., Reference Boudriche, Calvet, Hamdi and Balard2012; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Wang, Zhang, Zhang and Liang2020). Many small particles which were well dispersed on the Ni3/FePal and Ni14/FePal surfaces could be observed in Fig. 3d and Fig. 3e, respectively. These small particles could be assigned to Fe-Ni alloys according to XRD (Fig. 2b) and the mapping results. Furthermore, the Fe-Ni alloy particle sizes on Ni3/FePal (Fig. 3f) and Ni14/FePal (Fig. 3g) varied between 5 and 25 nm and the average sizes were 12.6 nm and 13.2 nm, respectively.

Figure 3. SEM and TEM images of the raw and freshly reduced catalysts: (a,b) raw FePal; (c) freshly reduced FePal; (d,f) freshly reduced Ni3/FePal and the PS distribution of Fe-Ni alloy; (e,g) freshly reduced Ni14/FePal and the PS distribution of the Fe-Ni alloy.

The H2-TPR profiles of FePal and Ni14/FePal are shown in Fig. 4. Five major peaks were observed (228, 302, 382, 572 and 818°C) in the raw FePal. Combined with data from the XRF results, we can see that the FePal contained 7.07% iron oxides. Therefore, these reduction peaks were considered to be the reduction of Fe on the surface and/or in the crystal structure of FePal (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Chang, Chen, He and Frost2012; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Chang, Chen, He, Yuan, Xie and Frost2013). Regarding Ni14/FePal, the peak observed at 224°C was due to the reduction of the un-interacted NiO to Ni (Peng et al., Reference Peng, Chen, Zhang, Li, Cui, Guo, Zhao and Zhang2021). The peak observed at 418°C was associated with the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ (Peng et al., Reference Peng, Chen, Zhang, Li, Cui, Guo, Zhao and Zhang2021; Tang et al., Reference Tang, Li, Shen and Wang2013; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Hu, Xiang, Xu, Shen, Liu, Xia, Ge, Wang and Li2022). Moreover, the reduction of the strongly interacted NiO with support could be observed at 525°C (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Hu, Xiang, Xu, Shen, Liu, Xia, Ge, Wang and Li2022). When Ni was introduced into the system (Ni14/FePal), the reduction peak of Fe2+ to Fe0 was observed to shift from 572°C to 640°C. Meanwhile, the reduction peak of Fe3+ to Fe2+ was observed to shift towards a higher-temperature region, which was attributed to the strong interaction between Fe and Ni (Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, Dou, Wang, Zhang, Song, Chen and Xu2016). The reduction peak at the higher temperatures of FePal (818°C) and Ni14/FePal (780°C) could be interpreted as the reduction of Fe in the crystal structure of Pal (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Hu, Xiang, Xu, Shen, Liu, Xia, Ge, Wang and Li2022; Zou et al., Reference Zou, Chen, Liu, Zhang, Ma, Xie and Chen2017). In addition, the ratio of hydrogen consumption between FePal and Ni14/FePal was ~0.24, indicating that the intense reduction reaction occurred over Ni14/FePal. By taking into account the XRD analysis in Fig. 2, Fe and Ni were reduced gradually and subsequently formed Fe-Ni alloys with the increase in reduction temperature.

Figure 4. H2-TPR profiles of FePal and Ni14/FePal.

Effect of Ni content

The catalysts with various Ni contents on CSRT and Eqs S7–S13 represent the possible reactions in CSRT (Fig. 5). The results showed a clear enhancement in both toluene conversion and catalyst stability with the introduction of Ni. The toluene conversions of Nix/FePal were maintained at >97% when the Ni content was >9%. This result could be attributed to the excellent performance of Ni in cleaving C–H and C–C bonds, leading to the formation of smaller and more reactive intermediates that can be further converted to lighter gaseous products. In addition, previous studies have demonstrated that Fe-Ni alloy can enhance the catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon, promoting catalyst reactivity and stability (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Hu, Xiang, Xu, Shen, Liu, Xia, Ge, Wang and Li2022; Zou et al., Reference Zou, Chen, Zhang, Chen, He, Dang, Ma, Chen, Toloueinia, Zhu, Xie, Liu and Suib2018).

Figure 5. Effect of Ni content on CSRT: (a) toluene conversion; (b–f) gas yields (reaction conditions: CT = 600°C, RT = 700°C, W = 0.3 g, S/C = 1, GHSV = 17052 h–1).

Based on the gaseous products, the reactions described in Eqs S7–S13 might occur simultaneously during the CSRT. The H2 yield of Ni9/FePal, Ni14/FePal and Ni17/FePal remained stable at >67%. Note that Ni14/FePal exhibited the greatest CO yield (>65%) among Nix/FePal catalysts, indicating the strong Boudouard reaction (Eq. S11) during CSRT over Ni14/FePal. These results indicated that appropriate Ni content was important for CSRT. Insufficient Ni content provided fewer active sites for CSRT, while excessive Ni content would reduce the amount of Fe on the catalysts, leading to the accumulation of coke and decreasing the catalytic efficiency.

Effect of calcination temperature

The catalytic activity of Ni14/FePal for CSRT at various different calcination temperatures is shown in Fig. 6. The toluene conversion exhibited an increasing trend (raw–700°C) and subsequently decreased with further increase in CT (700–800°C). The smaller amount of toluene conversion at low CT was probably because of the low dispersion of active sites, which was not conducive to CSRT (Barzegari et al., Reference Barzegari, Kazemeini, Rezaei, Farhadi and Keshavarz2022). The reduction in toluene conversion at a high CT of 800°C was probably due to the severe sintering of Fe-Ni alloys. The toluene conversion underwent no significant change and was maintained stably at >98% at 600°C and 700°C during the reaction process. There was almost no difference in H2 yields (>66%) at 600°C and 700°C; however, the CO yield reached >67% at 600°C while it was only ~30% at 700°C. Therefore, Ni14/FePal calcined in air at 600°C could maintain the best performance for CSRT.

Figure 6. Effect of calcination temperature of Ni14/FePal on CSRT: (a) toluene conversion; (b–f) gas yields (reaction conditions: RT = 700°C, W = 0.3 g, S/C = 1.0, GHSV = 17052 h–1).

Effect of reaction temperature

The catalytic efficacy of catalysts for CSRT may be influenced significantly by the reaction temperature (RT) (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Cao, zhang, Mao, Wang, Wang and Kawi2020; Tang et al., Reference Tang, Cao, Yang, Feng, Ren, Wang, Zhao, Zhao, Cui and Wei2020). The effect of RT (500–800°C) on CSRT over Ni14/FePal is illustrated in Fig. 7. With an increase in RT (500–700°C), the toluene conversion improved continuously and reached >98% at 700°C. However, no significant increase in toluene conversion was noted by further increase of the temperature (800°C), indicating that the reactions had approached thermodynamic equilibrium (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Hu, Xiang, Xu, Shen, Liu, Xia, Ge, Wang and Li2022). In addition, the catalytic activity was more stable at higher temperatures >700°C, which indicated that the RT had influence over the activity as had the stability of Ni14/FePal. Because of the endothermic character of CSRT (Park et al., Reference Park, Lee, Kwon, Lee, Kang, Hong and Kim2019), hydrocarbons can be decomposed and the carbon intermediates are prone to be oxidized more easily at higher temperatures (Kong et al., Reference Kong, Yang, Fei and Zheng2012).

Figure 7. Effect of reaction temperature of Ni14/FePal on CSRT: (a) toluene conversion; (b–f) gas yields (reaction conditions: W = 0.3 g, S/C = 1.0, GHSV = 17052 h–1).

The H2 yield was stable at ~65% (600–800°C), while the CO yield reached a maximum of 68% at 700°C and declined slightly at 800°C. Similarly, the CO2 yield increased from 6.9% to 8.1% (500–550°C) and then decreased from 8.1% to 0.8% (550–800°C). This phenomenon indicated that Eq. S13 was facilitated at 500–550°C and that the Boudouard reaction (Eq. S11) and water gas reaction (WGR; Eq. S12) were facilitated at 550–800°C. The benzene yield decreased with increasing RT, indicating that the hydrodealkylation reaction (Eq. S9) weakened constantly. According to the results in Fig. S2, the distributions of H2 and CO, and the molar ratio of H2/CO stabilized at ~60% and ~39% and at 1.5 at 700°C, respectively. The syngas with a constant gas component could be used to synthesize some chemicals through Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (Son et al., Reference Son, Lee, Soon, Roh and Lee2013). Therefore, 700°C was the optimum RT for CSRT in this experimental condition.

Effect of S/C ratio

The impact of various S/C ratios on catalytic activity of Ni14/FePal for CSRT at 700°C is shown in Fig. 8. The inclusion of steam greatly enhanced the catalytic activity of Ni14/FePal. Without steam, the toluene conversion and H2 yield exhibited a decrease, dropping from 16% and 4.6% to 2% and 1.8% (S/C = 0.0), respectively; only a little benzene was detected and almost no CO and CO2 were found in gaseous products, indicating that only a toluene-cracking reaction and the deactivation of Ni14/FePal had occurred under this reaction condition. As a result, carbon was deposited on the catalyst surface at a faster rate, causing the catalyst to deactivate quickly. The toluene conversion was observed to increase from 66.6 to 98.3% (0.5–1.0). In particular, when S/C = 1.0, the production of H2 and CO peaked, with yields exceeding 66% and 68%, respectively. This suggested that Eq. S7, Eq. S10 and Eq. S12 dominated during the reaction process, improving the production of H2 and CO. Nevertheless, continuing to improve the S/C molar rate (1.5 and 2.0) seemed to deliver no improvement in toluene conversion, while the H2 and CO yields decreased significantly from 66.2% and 68.7% to 45.6% and 53.6%, respectively. In addition, the yield of CO2 increased from 0.8% to 9.8%. This suggested that the reactions of Eq. S8 and Eq. S13 were likely to be enhanced. As displayed in Fig. S3, with S/C molar ratio increased, the H2 distribution remained stable at 64%, whereas the CO distribution decreased from 37 to 30%. At the same time, the CO2 distribution increased from 0 to 5%. These fluctuations caused an increase in the H2/CO molar ratio (1.7 to 2.2). The presence of steam could lead to adsorption saturation, which negatively affected catalyst activity (Gao et al., Reference Gao, Wang, Li, Wu and Yin2016). Excessive steam could also absorb a significant amount of heat and reduce the RT (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Chen, Cao, zhang, Mao, Wang, Wang and Kawi2020), leading to energy consumption and reduced catalytic activity. Therefore, S/C = 1.0 was the best for CSRT under the current conditions.

Figure 8. Effect of S/C ratio of Ni14/FePal on CSRT: (a) toluene conversion; (b–f) gas yields (reaction conditions: RT = 700°C, W = 0.3 g).

Lifetime evaluation

To evaluate the stability of Ni14/FePal, the reforming reaction was carried out for 62 h. As shown in Fig. 9, Ni14/FePal exhibited outstanding stability in toluene conversion and gas yields. The toluene conversion, H2 and CO yields were approximately maintained at 98%, 63% and 64%, respectively. In addition, the CO2, CH4 and benzene amounts were negligible (Fig. 9a). In accordance with the toluene conversion and gas yields obtained in the experiment, the carbon conversion of Ni14/FePal was estimated to be ~68.3%. The H2/CO molar ratio fluctuated between 1.5 and 1.6 (Fig. 9b). The highly dispersed Fe-Ni alloys could promote the activation of toluene molecules, which effectively prevented the carbon deposition and metal sintering, maintaining the activity of the catalyst (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Cheng, Lu, Ding and Zhou2009). The comparison with other catalysts for toluene conversion in Table S1 further indicated the excellent catalytic activity of Ni14/FePal. Therefore, Ni14/FePal was good for CSRT and syngas production.

Figure 9. Lifetime evaluation of Ni14/FePal for CSRT: (a) toluene conversion and gas yields; (b) H2/CO molar ratio (reaction conditions: RT = 700°C, W = 0.3 g, S/C = 1.0).

Kinetics study

The kinetics constants can be calculated using kinetics models. In this study, the reaction could be considered a quasi-first-order kinetics model (Mani et al., Reference Mani, Kastner and Juneja2013). In order to obtain dependable kinetics parameters of the Ni14/FePal catalyst for CSRT, the toluene conversion should be controlled at <25% (Oemar et al., Reference Oemar, Ming Li, Hidajat and Kawi2014; Xie et al., Reference Xie, Shu, Chen, Liu, Zou, Wang, Han and Chen2022). In addition, kinetics research should be performed without heat- or mass-transfer resistance. The reaction conditions for the kinetics study are presented in the supplementary information (SI). The toluene conversion increased first and then fluctuated slightly, indicating that external mass-transfer resistance had almost no effect on the reaction at gas-flow rates exceeding 200 mL/min (Fig. S4). The kinetics model can be expressed with Eqs S14–S17.

Based on the results in Fig. 10, the apparent activation energy (E a) and pre-exponential factor (A) of Ni14/FePal were calculated and reported in Table 1. The outcomes of the comparison indicated that the Ni14/FePal had a smaller E a value (33.99 kJ mol−1) than the other catalysts, demonstrating that the Ni14/FePal catalyst had high reactivity for CSRT.

Figure 10. The effect of RT on the toluene conversion of Ni14/FePal (a), and the Arrhenius plot for the calculation of E a (b). Reaction conditions: W = 3 mg, flow rate = 200 mL/min, GHSV = 3.4×106 h-1, S/C = 1.0, t = 30 min.

Table 1. Kinetics parameters for CSRT over Ni14/FePal catalyst and comparison with previous studies in the field.

ng = not given.

Characterization of the catalysts used

BET and XRD

The specific surface area (SSA), total pore volume (TPV), and crystal size (CZ) values of the catalysts before and after the CSRT reaction are listed in Table 2. With an increase in RT (500 to 800°C), the SSA and TPV of Ni14/FePal decreased from 85.7 m2/g and 0.26 cm3/g to 22.1 m2/g and 0.09 cm3/g, respectively. Conversely, the CZ increased from 10.2 nm to 24.7 nm. There was a decrease in SSA and an increase in the CZ of Nix/FePal compared to equivalent values before the reaction. These results could be attributed to the formation of carbon deposits and the sintering of active components at higher temperatures.

Table 2. Physicochemical properties of the catalysts.

nd = not detectable.

a The Debye-Scherrer equation can be conveniently applied to calculate particle sizes of <60 nm.

b Nix/FePal catalysts calcined in air at 600°C followed by H2 reduction at 700°C.

c Ni14/FePal-RT-S/C.

As shown in Fig. 11, Fe-Ni alloy peaks could be still observed at 44.2°2θ (111) and 51.6°2θ (200) in all catalysts after the reaction. The Fe-Ni alloy peaks became narrower (Fig. 11a) compared to that of the raw catalyst before the reaction (Fig. 2b). Similarly, the peaks of Fe-Ni alloys over Ni14/FePal reacted under various temperatures became stronger and narrower as the temperature increased (Fig. 11b), indicating that the CZ became larger after reaction, which was in agreement with the variation of CZ in Table 2. The peaks of the Fe-Ni alloys were narrowest, compared to the other catalysts, after calcination at 800°C (Fig. 11c), suggesting that the Fe-Ni alloy was more prone to sintering at high temperatures. Fe-Ni alloy peaks changed slightly as the S/C ratio increased (Fig. 11d), in agreement with CZ values in Table 2 which were calculated using the Scherrer equation.

Fig. 11. XRD patterns of the used catalysts: (a) reacted at 700°C; (b) Ni14/FePal reacted at various temperatures; (c) Ni14/FePal calcined at various temperatures; (d) Ni14/FePal reacted at various S/C molar ratios.

SEM and TEM analysis

SEM and TEM images, EDS mapping and the particle-size (PS) distributions of Fe-Ni alloys of the used catalysts are shown in Fig. 12. The morphology of the FePal support remained rod-like even after the reaction (Fig. 12a,b). Many highly dispersed small particles were observed in the SEM and TEM images. According to the XRD and EDS mapping results, these small particles were assigned to Fe-Ni alloys. As displayed in Fig. 12c,d, Ni3/FePal and Ni14/FePal reacted at 700°C showed minimal filamentous carbon deposition. This could be attributed to the high RT preventing the formation of filamentous coke, thus facilitating the decomposition of toluene to CO or CO2, improving the conversion of carbon. Nevertheless, filamentous carbon accumulation could be clearly observed in Ni14/FePal reacted at 500°C in Fig. 12e, which could be attributed to the accumulation of graphite-type coke (Yao et al., Reference Yao, Zhang, Williams, Yang and Chen2018). This form of coke deposition would blanket the catalyst surface, inhibiting the catalytic activity of the active species (Choong et al., Reference Choong, Zhong, Huang, Wang, Ang, Borgna, Lin, Hong and Chen2011). The particle sizes of Fe-Ni alloys were between 5 and 40 nm; the average sizes of the Ni3/FePal-700, Ni14/FePal-700 and Ni14/FePal-500 were 27.1 nm, 14.9 nm and 17.1 nm, respectively. This indicated that the sintering phenomenon occurred in the reforming reactions. However, according to the results in Fig. 7, this degree of sintering had no significant impact on the catalytic activity of Ni14/FePal.

Figure 12. SEM images and EDS mapping, TEM images and the particle-size distributions of the Fe-Ni alloy of the used catalysts. (a,c) Ni3/FePal-700; (b,d) Ni14/FePal-700; (e) Ni14/FePal-500.

Coke-deposition analysis

Raman spectroscopy is a useful tool for analyzing the structure and level of graphitization of the coke deposits (Yao et al., Reference Yao, Wu, Yang, Zhang, Nahil, Chen, Williams and Chen2017). The D-band and G-band (~1350 and ~1590 cm−1, respectively) represent the amorphous and ordered graphite carbon, respectively (Gong et al., Reference Gong, Liu, Wan, Chen, Wen, Mijowska, Jiang, Wang and Tang2012; He et al., Reference He, Liu, Meng, Sun, Biswas, Shen, Luo, Miao, Zhang, Mustain and Suib2016). The D/G ratio intensity is a significant indicator for estimating the graphitization or the disorder of carbon deposition (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Xiong, Fang, Li, Li and Li2020b; Son et al., Reference Son, Lee, Song, Jeon, Jung, Yun, Jeong, Shim, Jang and Roh2014). For example, a higher D/G ratio indicates that more amorphous carbon formed in the carbon structure. As the Ni content increased from 0 to 9% (Fig. 13a), the D/G ratio of the used catalysts increased, indicating that less graphite-type carbon had accumulated. In contrast, the intensities of Raman bands of Nix/FePal decreased continuously as the Ni content increased, suggesting a reduction in coke accumulation. This phenomenon suggested that a greater Ni content in the catalyst facilitated the formation of more Fe-Ni alloys, which in turn inhibited carbon accumulation (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Chen, Liu, Zhang, Wang, Dong, Chen, Xie, Zou, Suib and Li2020). The D/G ratio kept decreasing as the RT increased in Fig. 13b, suggesting that the graphite carbon tented to form under high temperatures. The higher D/G ratio suggested a greater disorder of carbon deposition and a lower impact on catalytic activity (García-Diéguez et al., Reference García-Diéguez, Pieta, Herrera, Larrubia and Alemany2010; Quek et al., Reference Quek, Liu, Cheo, Wang, Chen and Yang2010). The intensities of Raman bands of Ni14/FePal became lower as the RT exceeded 650°C, demonstrating that a smaller amount of coke deposition had occurred. Combined with the results in Fig. 7, one possible explanation was that the catalytic activity of Ni14/FePal was primarily associated with the amount of coke deposition rather than the types (Zou et al., Reference Zou, Chen, Zhang, Chen, He, Dang, Ma, Chen, Toloueinia, Zhu, Xie, Liu and Suib2018). The D/G ratio increased gradually and then stayed at 0.94, while the intensities of Raman bands reduced with increasing S/C molar ratio (Fig. 13c). This demonstrated that the formation of graphite-type coke was effectively controlled after the addition of steam.

Figure 13. Raman spectra of the spent catalysts: (a) Nix/FePal; (b) effect of RT on Ni14/FePal; (c) effect of S/C molar ratio on Ni14/FePal.

TG analysis was utilized to quantify the amount of coke deposited on the spent Ni14/FePal. The curves indicated that four stages of weight variations had occurred during oxidation of the used catalyst (Fig. 14a): (1) the weight loss at <100°C was due to the desorption of surface-adsorbed water molecules from the catalyst surface; (2) the weight loss at 100–250°C was considered to be a result of the elimination of amorphous carbon; (3) the weight increase at 250–500°C could be explained by the oxidation of Ni and Fe; and (4) the weight loss at 500–650°C was due to the elimination of graphite coke (Gao et al., Reference Gao, Han and Quan2018; Gao et al., Reference Gao, Chen, Lai and Quan2021). The amount and accumulation rate of coke deposition (calculated using Eq. S18) was shown in Fig. 14b to decrease with RT increasing from 500 to 800°C. The amount and accumulation rate of coke deposition were 0.12% and 0.6 mgC/gcath at 700°C, respectively. Moreover, the production of graphite coke was scarcely visible at 800°C. This indicated that the accumulation of coke could be effectively inhibited at high reaction temperatures.

Figure 14. TG curves (a) and the amount of coke deposition of the used Ni14/FePal catalyst (b) at various reaction temperatures.

Conclusions

In this study, the red Fe-rich palygorskite clay (FePal) was utilized as the support to prepare the Nix/FePal catalysts for CSRT. The iron in FePal could react with Ni during the reduction process to form the Fe-Ni alloys (awaruite) which were proven to be the active components for toluene conversion. Calcination under air atmosphere at an appropriate temperature could facilitate the dispersion of active components. Ni14/FePal had the greatest catalytic activity among Nix/FePal catalysts for CSRT. Under optimal reaction conditions (CT = 600°C, RT = 700°C, and S/C = 1.0), >98%, >66% and >68% toluene conversion, H2 and CO yields, respectively, were obtained over Ni14/FePal. The kinetics study indicated that the E a of Ni14/FePal was 33.99 kJ mol−1, which further confirmed the superior catalytic activity of Ni14/FePal for toluene conversion. Moreover, the high dispersion of Fe-Ni alloys and excellent coke resistance enabled Ni14/FePal to maintain high stability and reactivity for toluene conversion. This strategy using the FePal as a support for CSRT provided an alternative catalyst for tar conversion and might also promote its application in heterogeneous catalysis.

Financial support

This study was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41872040), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. 2108085QD164), and the fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. JZ2020HGTA0088).

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1180/clm.2023.12.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Chun Hui Zhou

References

Adnan, M.A., Muraza, O., Razzak, S.A., Hossain, M.M. & de Lasa, H.I. (2017). Iron Oxide over Silica-Doped Alumina Catalyst for Catalytic Steam Reforming of Toluene as a Surrogate Tar Biomass Species. Energy & Fuels, 31(7), 7471–7481. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asadullah, M., Miyazawa, T., Ito, S.-i., Kunimori, K., Koyama, S. & Tomishige, K. (2004). A comparison of Rh/CeO2/SiO2 catalysts with steam reforming catalysts, dolomite and inert materials as bed materials in low throughput fluidized bed gasification systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, 26(3), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0961-9534(03)00105-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashok, J. & Kawi, S. (2013). Nickel–Iron Alloy Supported over Iron–Alumina Catalysts for Steam Reforming of Biomass Tar Model Compound. ACS Catalysis, 4(1), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs400621pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashok, J., Dewangan, N., Das, S., Hongmanorom, P., Wai, M.H., Tomishige, K. & Kawi, S. (2020). Recent progress in the development of catalysts for steam reforming of biomass tar model reaction. Fuel Processing Technology, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzegari, F., Kazemeini, M., Rezaei, M., Farhadi, F. & Keshavarz, A.R. (2022). Syngas production through CO2 reforming of propane over highly active and stable mesoporous NiO-MgO-SiO2 catalysts: Effect of calcination temperature. Fuel, 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudriche, L., Calvet, R., Hamdi, B. & Balard, H. (2012). Surface properties evolution of attapulgite by IGC analysis as a function of thermal treatment. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 399, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., Zhao, J., Zhong, A. & Jin, Y. (2011). Removal capacity and adsorption mechanism of heat–treated palygorskite clay for methylene blue. Chemical Engineering Journal, 174(1), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Chen, T., Liu, H., Zhang, P., Wang, C., Dong, S., Chen, D., Xie, J., Zou, X., Suib, S.L. & Li, C. (2020). High catalytic performance of the Al–promoted Ni/Palygorskite catalysts for dry reforming of methane. Applied Clay Science, 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2020.105498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choong, C.K.S., Zhong, Z., Huang, L., Wang, Z., Ang, T.P., Borgna, A., Lin, J., Hong, L. & Chen, L. (2011). Effect of calcium addition on catalytic ethanol steam reforming of Ni/Al2O3: I. Catalytic stability, electronic properties and coking mechanism. Applied Catalysis A: General, 407(1–2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.08.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, S., Chen, T., Xu, F., Liu, H., Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Ji, M., Xu, C., Zhu, C., Li, Z. & Zou, X. (2022). Catalytic Oxidation of Toluene over Fe-Rich Palygorskite Supported Manganese Oxide: Characterization and Performance. Catalysts, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12070763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzatahmadi, N., Millar, G.J., Ayoko, G.A., Zhu, J., Zhu, R., Liang, X., He, H. & Xi, Y. (2019). Degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol using palygorskite-supported bimetallic Fe/Ni nanocomposite as a heterogeneous catalyst. Applied Clay Science, 168, 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.11.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furusawa, T., Saito, K., Kori, Y., Miura, Y., Sato, M. & Suzuki, N. (2013). Steam reforming of naphthalene/benzene with various types of Pt- and Ni-based catalysts for hydrogen production. Fuel, 103, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.09.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, M.J., Niu, Y.Q., Qu, X.J. & Zhou, C.H. (2022). Lignin to value-added chemicals and advanced materials: extraction, degradation, and functionalization. Green Chemistry, 24(20), 7705–7750. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2gc00092jCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, N., Wang, X., Li, A., Wu, C. & Yin, Z. (2016). Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of benzene as tar model compound of biomass gasification. Fuel Processing Technology, 148, 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.03.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, N., Han, Y. & Quan, C. (2018). Study on steam reforming of coal tar over Ni-Co/ceramic foam catalyst for hydrogen production: Effect of Ni/Co ratio. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(49), 22170–22186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, N., Chen, K., Lai, X. & Quan, C. (2021). Catalytic steam reforming of real tar under high-efficiency Ni/USY catalyst for H2 production. Fuel, 306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Diéguez, M., Pieta, I.S., Herrera, M.C., Larrubia, M.A. & Alemany, L.J. (2010). Nanostructured Pt- and Ni-based catalysts for CO2-reforming of methane. Journal of Catalysis, 270(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2009.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, J., Liu, J., Wan, D., Chen, X., Wen, X., Mijowska, E., Jiang, Z., Wang, Y. & Tang, T. (2012). Catalytic carbonization of polypropylene by the combined catalysis of activated carbon with Ni2O3 into carbon nanotubes and its mechanism. Applied Catalysis A: General, 449, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.09.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, J., Liu, Y., Meng, Y., Sun, X., Biswas, S., Shen, M., Luo, Z., Miao, R., Zhang, L., Mustain, W.E. & Suib, S.L. (2016). High-rate and long-life of Li-ion batteries using reduced graphene oxide/Co3O4 as anode materials. RSC Advances, 6(29), 24320–24330. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra03790aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, L., Hu, S., Yin, X., Xu, J., Han, H., Li, H., Ren, Q., Su, S., Wang, Y. & Xiang, J. (2020). Promoting effects of Fe-Ni alloy on co-production of H2 and carbon nanotubes during steam reforming of biomass tar over Ni-Fe/α-Al2O3. Fuel, 276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higo, T., Saito, H., Ogo, S., Sugiura, Y. & Sekine, Y. (2017). Promotive effect of Ba addition on the catalytic performance of Ni/LaAlO3 catalysts for steam reforming of toluene. Applied Catalysis A: General, 530, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.11.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, B., Dou, B., Wang, K., Zhang, C., Song, Y., Chen, H. & Xu, Y. (2016). Hydrogen production by chemical looping steam reforming of ethanol using NiO/montmorillonite oxygen carriers in a fixed-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 298, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathiraser, Y., Ashok, J. & Kawi, S. (2016). Synthesis and evaluation of highly dispersed SBA-15 supported Ni–Fe bimetallic catalysts for steam reforming of biomass derived tar reaction. Catalysis Science & Technology, 6(12), 4327–4336. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cy01910aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, M., Yang, Q., Fei, J. & Zheng, X. (2012). Experimental study of Ni/MgO catalyst in carbon dioxide reforming of toluene, a model compound of tar from biomass gasification. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(18), 13355–13364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.06.108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Wang, Y., Zhou, N., Dai, L., Deng, W., Liu, C., Cheng, Y., Liu, Y., Cobb, K., Chen, P. & Ruan, R. (2021). Applications of calcium oxide–based catalysts in biomass pyrolysis/gasification – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Chen, T., Chang, D., Chen, D., He, H. & Frost, R.L. (2012). Catalytic cracking of tar derived from rice hull gasification over palygorskite-supported Fe and Ni. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 363-364, 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2012.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Chen, T., Chang, D., Chen, D., He, H., Yuan, P., Xie, J. & Frost, R.L. (2013). Characterization and catalytic performance of Fe3Ni8/palygorskite for catalytic cracking of benzene. Applied Clay Science, 74, 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C., Chen, D., Cao, Y., zhang, T., Mao, Y., Wang, W., Wang, Z. & Kawi, S. (2020). Catalytic steam reforming of in-situ tar from rice husk over MCM-41 supported LaNiO3 to produce hydrogen rich syngas. Renewable Energy, 161, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, M., Xiong, Z., Fang, K., Li, J., Li, X. & Li, T. (2020a). Effect of Promoters on Steam Reforming of Toluene over a Ni-Based Catalyst Supported on Coal Gangue Ash. ACS Omega, 5(41), 26335–26346. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, M., Xiong, Z., Fang, K., Li, X., Li, J. & Li, T. (2020b). Steam reforming of toluene over nickel catalysts supported on coal gangue ash. Renewable Energy, 160, 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, Q. & Wang, A. (2022). Hydrochloric acid pretreatment combined with microwave-assisted oxalic acid leaching of natural red palygorskite-rich clay for efficiently change the color and properties. Applied Clay Science, 228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2022.106594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, S., Kastner, J.R. & Juneja, A. (2013). Catalytic decomposition of toluene using a biomass derived catalyst. Fuel Processing Technology, 114, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.03.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, D., Lebarbier, V.M., Rousseau, R., Glezakou, V.-A., Albrecht, K.O., Kovarik, L., Flake, M. & Dagle, R.A. (2013). Comparative Investigation of Benzene Steam Reforming over Spinel Supported Rh and Ir Catalysts. ACS Catalysis, 3(6), 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs4000427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekki, A., Mokhtar, A., Hachemaoui, M., Beldjilali, M., Meliani, M.f., Zahmani, H.H., Hacini, S. & Boukoussa, B. (2021). Fe and Ni nanoparticles-loaded zeolites as effective catalysts for catalytic reduction of organic pollutants. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Min, Z., Yimsiri, P., Asadullah, M., Zhang, S. & Li, C.-Z. (2011). Catalytic reforming of tar during gasification. Part II. Char as a catalyst or as a catalyst support for tar reforming. Fuel, 90(7), 2545–2552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.03.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oemar, U., Ming Li, A., Hidajat, K. & Kawi, S. (2014). Mechanism and kinetic modeling for steam reforming of toluene on La0.8Sr0.2Ni0.8Fe0.2O3 catalyst. AIChE Journal, 60(12), 4190–4198. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, N.-K., Lee, Y., Kwon, B., Lee, T., Kang, S., Hong, B. & Kim, T. (2019). Optimization of Nickel-Based Catalyst Composition and Reaction Conditions for the Prevention of Carbon Deposition in Toluene Reforming. Energies, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12071307Google Scholar
Peng, R., Chen, Y., Zhang, B., Li, Z., Cui, X., Guo, C., Zhao, Y. & Zhang, J. (2021). Tailoring the stability of Ni-Fe/mayenite in methane–carbon dioxide reforming. Fuel, 284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quek, X.-Y., Liu, D., Cheo, W.N.E., Wang, H., Chen, Y. & Yang, Y. (2010). Nickel-grafted TUD-1 mesoporous catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 95(3-4), 374-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.01.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, J., Cao, J.-P., Zhao, X.-Y., Wei, F., Zhu, C. & Wei, X.-Y. (2017). Extension of catalyst lifetime by doping of Ce in Ni-loaded acid-washed Shengli lignite char for biomass catalytic gasification. Catalysis Science & Technology, 7(23), 5741–5749. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cy01670kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, J., Yang, F.-L. & Liu, Y.-L. (2021a). Enhanced H2-Rich Gas Production via Steam Reforming of Toluene over Ni-Based Hydrotalcite-Derived Catalysts at Low Temperature. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9(24), 8315–8326. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, J., Cao, J.-P., Yang, F.-L., Liu, Y.-L., Tang, W. & Zhao, X.-Y. (2021b). Understandings of Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration during Biomass Tar Reforming: A Crucial Review. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9(51), 17186–17206. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santanna, V.C., Silva, S.L., Silva, R.P. & Castro Dantas, T.N. (2020). Use of palygorskite as a viscosity enhancer in salted water-based muds: effect of concentration of palygorskite and salt. Clay Minerals, 55(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1180/clm.2020.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Son, I.H., Lee, S.J., Soon, A., Roh, H.-S. & Lee, H. (2013). Steam treatment on Ni/γ-Al2O3 for enhanced carbon resistance in combined steam and carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 134–135, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Son, I.H., Lee, S.J., Song, I.Y., Jeon, W.S., Jung, I., Yun, D.J., Jeong, D.-W., Shim, J.-O., Jang, W.-J. & Roh, H.-S. (2014). Study on coke formation over Ni/γ-Al2O3, Co-Ni/γ-Al2O3, and Mg-Co-Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Fuel, 136, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.07.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, X., Li, L., Shen, B. & Wang, C. (2013). Halloysite-nanotubes supported FeNi alloy nanoparticles for catalytic decomposition of toxic phosphine gas into yellow phosphorus and hydrogen. Chemosphere, 91(9), 1368–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, W., Cao, J.-P., Yang, F.-L., Feng, X.-B., Ren, J., Wang, J.-X., Zhao, X.-Y., Zhao, M., Cui, X. & Wei, X.-Y. (2020). Highly active and stable HF acid modified HZSM-5 supported Ni catalysts for steam reforming of toluene and biomass pyrolysis tar. Energy Conversion and Management, 212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Li, D., Koike, M., Koso, S., Nakagawa, Y., Xu, Y. & Tomishige, K. (2011). Catalytic performance and characterization of Ni-Fe catalysts for the steam reforming of tar from biomass pyrolysis to synthesis gas. Applied Catalysis A: General, 392(1–2), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D., Yuan, W. & Ji, W. (2011). Char and char-supported nickel catalysts for secondary syngas cleanup and conditioning. Applied Energy, 88(5), 1656–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Li, D., Koike, M., Watanabe, H., Xu, Y., Nakagawa, Y. & Tomishige, K. (2013). Catalytic performance and characterization of Ni–Co catalysts for the steam reforming of biomass tar to synthesis gas. Fuel, 112, 654–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Li, D., Watanabe, H., Tamura, M., Nakagawa, Y. & Tomishige, K. (2014). Catalytic performance and characterization of Co/Mg/Al catalysts prepared from hydrotalcite-like precursors for the steam gasification of biomass. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 150–151, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, K., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y. & Liang, J. (2020). Microstructural evolution and sintering properties of palygorskite nanofibers. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 17(4), 1833–1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijac.13485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Gainey, L., Wang, X., Mackinnon, I.D.R. & Xi, Y. (2022). Influence of palygorskite on in-situ thermal behaviours of clay mixtures and properties of fired bricks. Applied Clay Science, 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2021.106384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, H., Shu, D., Chen, T., Liu, H., Zou, X., Wang, C., Han, Z. & Chen, D. (2022). An in-situ DRIFTs study of Mn doped FeVO4 catalyst by one-pot synthesis for low-temperature NH3-SCR. Fuel, 309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, B., Guo, H., Liu, L. & Chen, M. (2018). Preparation, characterization and catalytic properties of yttrium-zirconium-pillared montmorillonite and their application in supported Ce catalysts. Clay Minerals, 50(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2015.050.2.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, D., Wu, C., Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Nahil, M.A., Chen, Y., Williams, P.T. & Chen, H. (2017). Co-production of hydrogen and carbon nanotubes from catalytic pyrolysis of waste plastics on Ni-Fe bimetallic catalyst. Energy Conversion and Management, 148, 692–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, D., Zhang, Y., Williams, P.T., Yang, H. & Chen, H. (2018). Co-production of hydrogen and carbon nanotubes from real-world waste plastics: Influence of catalyst composition and operational parameters. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 221, 584–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Cheng, H., Lu, X., Ding, W. & Zhou, G. (2009). Influence of rare earth promoters on the performance of Ni/Mg(Al)O catalysts for hydrogenation and steam reforming of toluene. Rare Metals, 28(6), 582–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-009-0112-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Wang, W., Tian, G., Wang, Q. & Wang, A. (2018). Solvothermal evolution of red palygorskite in dimethyl sulfoxide/water. Applied Clay Science, 159, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.06.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Wang, W., Kang, Y., Wang, Q. & Wang, A. (2018). Structure evolution of brick-red palygorskite induced by hydroxylammonium chloride. Powder Technology, 327, 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.12.067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Zou, X., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Dong, S., Ji, M., Chen, D., Xu, C., Xie, H., Zhu, C., Suib, S.L. & Chen, T. (2022). Comparative study of mineral with different structures supported Fe-Ni catalysts for steam reforming of toluene. Fuel, 315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S., Hu, W., Xiang, X., Xu, H., Shen, Z., Liu, Y., Xia, Q., Ge, Z., Wang, Y. & Li, X. (2022). Ni-Fe-Ce hydrotalcite-derived structured reactor as catalyst for efficient steam reforming of toluene. Fuel Processing Technology, 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.107077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, C.-H., Shen, Z.-F., Liu, L.-H. & Liu, S.-M. (2011). Preparation and functionality of clay-containing films. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 21(39). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm11479dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, S., Chen, Z., Gong, H., Wang, X., Zhu, T. & Zhou, Y. (2020). Low-temperature catalytic steam reforming of toluene as a biomass tar model compound over three-dimensional ordered macroporous Ni-Pt/Ce1−xZrxO2 catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General, 607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, X., Chen, T., Liu, H., Zhang, P., Ma, Z., Xie, J. & Chen, D. (2017). An insight into the effect of calcination conditions on catalytic cracking of toluene over 3Fe8Ni/palygorskite: Catalysts characterization and performance. Fuel, 190, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, X., Chen, T., Zhang, P., Chen, D., He, J., Dang, Y., Ma, Z., Chen, Y., Toloueinia, P., Zhu, C., Xie, J., Liu, H. & Suib, S.L. (2018). High catalytic performance of Fe-Ni/Palygorskite in the steam reforming of toluene for hydrogen production. Applied Energy, 226, 827–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The CSRT reaction system.

Figure 1

Figure 2. XRD patterns of catalysts. Ni14/FePal heat treated in air at various temperatures (a) and Nix/FePal heat treated in air at 600°C (b), and subsequently reduced in H2 at 700°C.

Figure 2

Figure 3. SEM and TEM images of the raw and freshly reduced catalysts: (a,b) raw FePal; (c) freshly reduced FePal; (d,f) freshly reduced Ni3/FePal and the PS distribution of Fe-Ni alloy; (e,g) freshly reduced Ni14/FePal and the PS distribution of the Fe-Ni alloy.

Figure 3

Figure 4. H2-TPR profiles of FePal and Ni14/FePal.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Effect of Ni content on CSRT: (a) toluene conversion; (b–f) gas yields (reaction conditions: CT = 600°C, RT = 700°C, W = 0.3 g, S/C = 1, GHSV = 17052 h–1).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Effect of calcination temperature of Ni14/FePal on CSRT: (a) toluene conversion; (b–f) gas yields (reaction conditions: RT = 700°C, W = 0.3 g, S/C = 1.0, GHSV = 17052 h–1).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Effect of reaction temperature of Ni14/FePal on CSRT: (a) toluene conversion; (b–f) gas yields (reaction conditions: W = 0.3 g, S/C = 1.0, GHSV = 17052 h–1).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Effect of S/C ratio of Ni14/FePal on CSRT: (a) toluene conversion; (b–f) gas yields (reaction conditions: RT = 700°C, W = 0.3 g).

Figure 8

Figure 9. Lifetime evaluation of Ni14/FePal for CSRT: (a) toluene conversion and gas yields; (b) H2/CO molar ratio (reaction conditions: RT = 700°C, W = 0.3 g, S/C = 1.0).

Figure 9

Figure 10. The effect of RT on the toluene conversion of Ni14/FePal (a), and the Arrhenius plot for the calculation of Ea (b). Reaction conditions: W = 3 mg, flow rate = 200 mL/min, GHSV = 3.4×106 h-1, S/C = 1.0, t = 30 min.

Figure 10

Table 1. Kinetics parameters for CSRT over Ni14/FePal catalyst and comparison with previous studies in the field.

Figure 11

Table 2. Physicochemical properties of the catalysts.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. XRD patterns of the used catalysts: (a) reacted at 700°C; (b) Ni14/FePal reacted at various temperatures; (c) Ni14/FePal calcined at various temperatures; (d) Ni14/FePal reacted at various S/C molar ratios.

Figure 13

Figure 12. SEM images and EDS mapping, TEM images and the particle-size distributions of the Fe-Ni alloy of the used catalysts. (a,c) Ni3/FePal-700; (b,d) Ni14/FePal-700; (e) Ni14/FePal-500.

Figure 14

Figure 13. Raman spectra of the spent catalysts: (a) Nix/FePal; (b) effect of RT on Ni14/FePal; (c) effect of S/C molar ratio on Ni14/FePal.

Figure 15

Figure 14. TG curves (a) and the amount of coke deposition of the used Ni14/FePal catalyst (b) at various reaction temperatures.

Supplementary material: File

Ji et al. supplementary material

Ji et al. supplementary material

Download Ji et al. supplementary material(File)
File 474.2 KB