We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Till Hoeppner, Urteil und Anschauung. Kants metaphysische Deduktion der Kategorien, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021. Pp. xvii + 410. ISBN 9783110556278 (hbk) $126.99
Review products
Till Hoeppner, Urteil und Anschauung. Kants metaphysische Deduktion der Kategorien, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021. Pp. xvii + 410. ISBN 9783110556278 (hbk) $126.99
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
07 November 2023
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Brandt, Reinhard (1991) Die Urteilstafel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft A67–76;B92–101. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Conant, James (2016) ‘Why Kant Is Not a Kantian’. Philosophical Topics, 44(1), 75–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, Ian (2003) ‘Kant’s Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41(2), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus (1932) Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Berlin: R. Schoetz.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael (1995) Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar