Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:21:11.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Laura Aull
Laura Aull
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
You Can't Write That
8 Myths About Correct English
 , pp. 189 - 223
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Primary Sources

Curzan, A. (2014). Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggington, W. (1997). The English Language Metaphors We Plan by, in Language Policy: Dominant English, Pluralist Challenges, eds. Eggington, W and Wren, H., 29–46. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graff, H. J. (2010). The Literacy Myth at Thirty. Journal of Social History, 4(3), 635–61.Google Scholar
Mills, J. (2020). Toward a Theory of Myth. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 50(4), 410–24.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2006). From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive Construction and Popular Exaggeration of New Media Language in the Print Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 667–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajko, V. and Leonard, M. (2006). Laughing with Medusa: Classical Myth and Feminist Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Aull, B. and Aull, L. L. (2021 ). “Write a Greeting for Your Email Here”: Principles for Assessing Interpersonal Workplace Email Communication. Journal of Writing Analytics, 5 (1) 215–58.Google Scholar
Aull, L. L. (2020). How Students Write: A Linguistic Analysis. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Egbert, J. (2018). Register Variation Online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2005). Register Variation: A Corpus Approach, in The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, eds. Tannen, D, Hamilton, H. E, and Schiffrin, D, 175–96. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature, in Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, ed. Tannen, D, 35–54. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Clark, R. et al. (1990). Critical Language Awareness Part I: A Critical Review of Three Current Approaches to Language Awareness. Language and Education, 4(4), 249–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2015). The Importance of Robust Corpora in Providing More Realistic Descriptions of Variation in English Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 305–12.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 1970. Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hardy, J. A. and Friginal, E. (2016). Genre Variation in Student Writing: A Multi-dimensional Analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, J. A. and Römer, U. (2013). Revealing Disciplinary Variation in Student Writing: A Multi-dimensional Analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8(2), 183–207.Google Scholar
Hartig, A. J. and Lu, X. (2014). Plain English and Legal Writing: Comparing Expert and Novice Writers. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 87–96.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 116–27.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2013). English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: The Politics of Academic English Language Policy. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge,Google Scholar
Johns, A. M (1997). Text, Role, and Context: Developing Academic Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, R. (2016). ELF in the Making? Simplification and Hybridity in Abstract Writing. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5(1), 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCulloch, G. (2019). Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Milu, E. (2021). Diversity of Raciolinguistic Experiences in the Writing Classroom: An Argument for a Transnational Black Language Pedagogy. College English, 83(6), 415–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. (2022). Cultivating Critical Language Awareness in the Classroom. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smitherman, G. (2017). Raciolinguistics, “Mis-education,” and Language Arts Teaching in the 21st Century. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 32(2), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sword, H. (2012). Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2016). Dear Student, I Just Don’t Have Time to Mark your Essay Properly. In the Guardian, 20 May.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in Society, Culture, and Education. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the Local in Language Policy and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, B. et al. (2011). Language Difference in Writing: Toward a Translingual Approach. College English, 73(3), 303–21.Google Scholar
Matsuda, P. K. (2012). Let’s Face It: Language Issues and the Writing Program Administrator. Writing Program Administration, 36(1), 141–64.Google Scholar
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–67.Google Scholar
Nesi, H. and Gardner, S. (2012). Genres Across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. and Traugott, E. C. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. and Feak, C. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Trachsel, M. (1987). The History of College Entrance Examinations in English: A Record of Academic Assumptions about Literacy. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Truss, L. (2004). Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero-Tolerance Approach to Punctuation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. (1776). The Philosophy of Rhetoric: In two volumes. Edinburgh: W. Strahan; T. Cadell and W. Creech.Google Scholar
Head, F. H. (1883). What is a Liberal Education: An Address. Utica, MY: Ellis H. Roberts & Company Printers.Google Scholar
Hill, A. S. (1995). An Answer to the Cry for More English, in The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College 1875–1925: A Documentary History, ed. Brereton, J. C, 45–57. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Newbolt, H. J., (1921). The Teaching of English in England: Being the Report of the Departmental Committee Appointed by the President of the Board of Education to Inquire into the Position of English in the Educational System of England. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ash, J. (1788). Grammatical Institutes: or An Easy Introduction to Dr. Lowth’s English Grammar. A new edition. Revised, corrected and enlarged. London: Charles Dilly.Google Scholar
Baker, J. (2019). An Introduction to English Legal History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, R. M. (1997). The English Primer – A Circular Journey. Internationale Schulbuchforschung, 19(3), 249–58.Google Scholar
Bex, T. and Watts, R. J (eds), Standard English: the Widening Debate. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bryson, B. and Case, D., (1990). The Mother Tongue: English & How It Got that Way. New York: W. Morrow.Google Scholar
Curzan, A. and Adams, M. (2012). How English Works: A Linguistic Instruction. 3rd ed. Glenview, IL: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Downey, C. (1979). Introduction, in Grammatical Institutes, ed. Ash, J., Delmar, NY: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.Google Scholar
Eggington, W. and Wren, H. (1997). Language Policy: Dominant English, Pluralist Challenges. Vol. 83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, A. (1770). The Pleasing Instructor or Entertaining Moralist, Consisting of Select Essays, Relations, Visions, and Allegories Collected from… Eminent English Authors… to which are Prefixed New Thoughts on Education. London: Robinson, and Newcastle: Slack.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. H. (1977). Chancery and the Emergence of Standard Written English in the Fifteenth Century. Speculum, 52(4), 870–99.Google Scholar
Flanders, J., (2020). A Place for Everything: The Curious History of Alphabetical Order. London: Picador.Google Scholar
Hammond, S. (1760). A complete and comprehensive spelling-dictionary of the English language, on the newest plan; for the use of young gentlemen, ladies, and others … By Samuel Hammond; Schoolmaster in Nottingham … Nottingham: Samuel Creswell.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1850). A Dictionary of the English Language: In which the Words Are Deduced from Their Originals; and Illustrated in Their Different Significations by Examples from the Best Writers. London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar
King, R. P. (2018). The Draconian Dictionary Is Back, in The Atlantic, August 5.Google Scholar
Kitzhaber, A. (1963). Themes, Theories and Therapy: The Writing of College Students. New York: McGraw-Hill Company.Google Scholar
Lang, B. (1982). Strunk, White and Grammar as Morality. Soundings , 65(1), 23–30.Google Scholar
Lowth, R. (1776). A Short Introduction to English Grammar: With Critical Notes. London: J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. (2009). The Lexicographer’s Dilemma: The Evolution of ‘Proper’ English, from Shakespeare to South Park. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. (2021). A Place for Everything: The Curious History of Alphabetical Order by Judith Flanders. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America,. 42(1), 281–5.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (2019). The Dictionary Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Massing, M. (2018). Fatal Discord: Erasmus, Luther, and the Fight for the Western Mind. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Miller, T. P. (1997). The Formation of College English: Rhetoric and Belles Lettres in the British Cultural Provinces. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Murray, L. (1979 [1795]). English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners.Google Scholar
London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Scragg, D. G. (1974). A History of English Spelling. vol. 3. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Swift, J. (1969 [1712]). A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue, ed. Alston, R. C.. Menston.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2000). Of Norms and Networks: The Language of Robert Lowth, in the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Ulman, H. L. (1990). Discerning Readers: British Reviewers’ Responses to Campbell’s Rhetoric and Related Works. Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 8(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1990.8.1.65.Google Scholar
Upward, C. and Davidson, G. (2011). The History of English Spelling, vol. 26. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
van Ostade, I.T.-B. (2010). The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the Rise of Prescriptivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vorlat, E., (1959). The Sources of Lindley Murray’s “The English Grammar.” Leuvense Bijdragen, 48, 108–25.Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1962 [1828]). From the Preface to An American Dictionary of the English Language, in Dictionaries and “That” Dictionary: A Casebook on the Aims of Lexicographers and the Targets of Reviewers, eds. Sledd, J. and Ebbitt, W. B., 32–5. Chicago: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1790). The American Spelling Book, vol. 1. Worcester, MA: Isaiah Thomas.Google Scholar
Baker, J. T. ( 1899). Correct English: How to Use It, in Correct EnglishGoogle Scholar
Ball, C. E. and Loewe, D. M. (eds.) (2017). Bad Ideas About Writing. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Libraries Digital Publishing Institute.Google Scholar
Brown, D. W. (forthcoming). Dictionaries, Language Ideologies, and Language Attitudes, in Cambridge Handbook of the Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2012). Verbal Hygiene. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B. (2012). 15 Grammar Goofs That Make You Look Silly, on Copyblogger: https://copyblogger.com/grammar-goofs/.Google Scholar
Eliot, C. W. (1888). Can School Programs Be Shortened and Enriched? Atlantic Monthly, 1012, 250–8.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2007). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gould, C. (1987). Josephine Turck Baker, ‘Correct English,’ and the Ancestry of Pop Grammar. The English Journal, 76(1) 22–7.Google Scholar
Graham, S. and Santangelo, T., (2014). Does Spelling Instruction Make Students Better Spellers, Readers, and Writers? A Meta-analytic Review. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1703–43.Google Scholar
Horner, W.B., (1990). The Roots of Modern Writing Instruction: Eighteenth‐ and Nineteenth‐century Britain. Rhetoric Review, 8(2), 322–45.Google Scholar
Lang, B., (2020). Strunk, White, and Grammar as Morality, in Writing and the Moral Self, 11–18, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, R., (1994). Accent, Standard Language Ideology, and Discriminatory Pretext in the Courts. Language in Society, 23(2), 163–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. L. ( 1900). Literary Study and Character Formation. The School Review, 8(5), 285–91.Google Scholar
Pattanayak, A. (2017). There is One Correct Way of Writing and Speaking, in Bad Ideas About Writing, eds. Ball, C. E. and Loewe, D. M., 82–7. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Libraries Digital Publishing Institute.Google Scholar
Pei, M. (1967). The Story of the English Language. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (2009). 50 Years of Stupid Grammar Advice. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(32), B15.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T. ( 2005). Selling College Literacy: The Mass-market Magazine as Early 20th-Century Literacy Sponsor. American Periodicals: A Journal of History & Criticism, 15(2), 163–77.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. (2009). The ‘Elements of Style’ Turns 50, in The New York Times, April 29.Google Scholar
Vorlat, E. (1999). On the Originality of Lindley Murray’s Prescriptive Canon. Thinking English Grammar. Leuven/Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Wallraff, B. (2015). Improve Your Writing to Improve Your Credibility, in Harvard Business Review, July 29.Google Scholar
Zachrisson, R. E. (1931). Four Hundred Years of English Spelling Reform. Studia neophilologica, 4(1), 1–69.Google Scholar
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. vol. 24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Aull, L. L. (2015). First-year University Writing: A Corpus-based Study with Implications for Oedagogy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, D. (2009). A Better Pencil: Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Gray, B., (2010). Challenging Stereotypes about Academic Writing: Complexity, Elaboration, Explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20.Google Scholar
Biber, D. et al. (2002). Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36(1), 9–48.Google Scholar
Groom, N. (2009). Phraseology and Epistemology in Academic Book Reviews: A Corpus-driven Analysis of Two Humanities Disciplines, in Academic Evaluation, 122–39, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. and Guinda, C.S. (2012). Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
McNamara, D. S. (2013). The Epistemic Stance between the Author and Reader: A Driving Force in the Cohesion of Text and Writing. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 579–95.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. (2022). Blackness and Standard English Can Coexist. Professors, Take Note, in The New York Times, May 3.Google Scholar
Pratt, R. A. (2017). Selma’s Bloody Sunday: Protest, Voting Rights, and the Struggle for Racial Equality. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Römer, U. and Wulff, S. (2010). Applying Corpus Methods to Written Academic Texts: Explorations of MICUSP. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), 99–127.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. and Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic Ruin? LOL! Instant Messaging and Teen Language. American Speech, 83(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58–78.Google Scholar
Waldron, S., Wood, C., and Kemp, N. (2017). Use of Predictive Text in Text Messaging over the Course of a Year and its Relationship with Spelling, Orthographic Processing and Grammar. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(4), 384–402.Google Scholar
Clarendon Report (1864). In Report of Her Majesty’s Commissioners appointed to inquire into the Revenues and Management of Certain Colleges and Schools, and the Studies Pursued and Instruction Given Therein. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Defoe, D. and Bülbring, K. D. (1890). The Compleat English Gentleman. London: Folcroft Library Editions.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (2018). We Must Help Students Master Standard English. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 10.Google Scholar
Rae, J. (1982). The Decline and Fall of English Grammar. The Observer, February 7.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D. and Lee, P. A., (1995). Education and the Scottish People, 1750–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bain, A. (1866). English Composition and Rhetoric. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Blair, H., (1965 [1784]). Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Published by Robert Aitken, at Pope’s Head in Market Street, reprinted 1965. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Cambridge, University of, Local Examination Syndicate (UCLES). (1883). Examiner Bound Volume Report 1883. Cambridge Assessment Archives & Heritage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Assessment.Google Scholar
Conrick, M. and Donovan, P. (2010). Immigration and Language Policy and Planning in Quebec and Canada: Language Learning and Integration. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31(4), 331–45.Google Scholar
De Bellaigue, C. (2018). Home Education in Historical Perspective: Domestic Pedagogies in England and Wales, 1750–1900. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Devon Commission (1847). Digest of Evidence Taken Before Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Inquiry into the State of the Law and Practice in Respect to the Occupation of Land in Ireland. Part I.Google Scholar
Eggington, W. and Wren, H., (1997). Language Policy: Dominant English, Pluralist Challenges. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2009). Is Public Discourse about Language Policy Really Public Discourse about Immigration? A Corpus-based Study. Language Policy, 8(4), 377–402.Google Scholar
Franklin, B. (1931). Observations Relative to the Intentions of the Original Founders of the Academy in Philadelphia, in Educational Views of Benjamin Franklin, ed. Woody, T. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Graff, H. J. (1979). The Literacy Myth: Literacy and Social Structure in the Nineteenth-century City. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hodson, J. (2006). The problem of Joseph Priestley’s (1733–1804) descriptivism. Historiographia Linguistica, 33(1–2), 57–84.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, A. H. (1974). Language as a Means of Social Control: The United States Experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the World Congress of Sociology (Eighth) in Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Logan, D. (1979). Universities in the Commonwealth. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 127(5279), 700–17.Google Scholar
London, University of. ( 1838–43). Examination and Matriculation Papers. London.Google Scholar
Miller, T. P. (1990). Where Did College English Studies Come From? Rhetoric Review, 9(1), 50–69.Google Scholar
Monaghan, E. J. (1991). Family Literacy in Early 18th-Century Boston: Cotton Mather and His Children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 342–70.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, L. (2003). Talking proper: The rise of accent as social symbol. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ozolins, U. and Clyne, M. (2001). Immigration and Language Policy, in The Other Languages of Europe: Demographic, Sociolinguistic, and Educational Perspectives, eds. Extra, G and Gorter, D, 371–90. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters and European Cultural Foundation.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2002). We Have Room for But One Language Here: Language and National Identity in the US at the Turn of the 20th Century. Multilingua, 21(2–3), 163–96.Google Scholar
Popular Education in England, vols. I to VI. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. (1772). A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism. London: J.Google Scholar
Johnson.Google Scholar
Raftery, D., McDermid, J., and Jones, G. E. (2007). Social Change and Education in Ireland, Scotland and Wales: Historiography on Nineteenth‐century Schooling. History of Education, 36(4–5), 447–63.Google Scholar
Reinhold, M. (1968). Opponents of Classical Learning in America during the Revolutionary Period. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 112(4), 221–34.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. (2002).“The Future Good and Great of our Land”: Republican Mothers, Female Authors, and Domesticated Literacy in Antebellum New England. The New England Quarterly, 75(4), 562–91.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. (2004). Managing Literacy, Mothering America: Women’s Narratives on Reading and Writing in the Nineteenth Century. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Sack, S. (1962). Liberal Education: What Was it? What Is it? History of Education Quarterly, 2(4), 210–24.Google Scholar
Spack, R. (2002). America’s Second Tongue: American Indian Education and the Ownership of English, 1860–1900. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Suto, I., and Oates, T (2021). High-stakes Testing after Basic Secondary Education: How and Why Is it Done in High-performing Education Systems? Cambridge Assessment Research Report. Cambridge: Cambridge Assessment.Google Scholar
The Royal Commission on the State of Popular Education in England [Newcastle Commission], Parliamentary Papers, 1861, XXI, pp. 293–328; in English Historical Documents, XII(1), 1833–1874, ed. by G. M. Young and W. D. Hancock (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1956), pp. 891–97.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. (1997). Bilinguals and Bilingualism: Language Policy in an Anti-immigrant Age. International Journal of Society and Language, 127, 25–52.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, B. and van Leeuwen-Li, J. (2015). Average Years of Education., IISH Dataverse: hdl. handle. net/10622/KCBMKI.Google Scholar
Woody, T. (1920). Early Quaker Education in Pennsylvania. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (2015). The Costs of English-only Education, The Atlantic, November 2.Google Scholar
Arnet, C. et al. (1994). Teaching Children How to Discriminate. Paper presented at NWAVE Conference, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. ( 1979). If Black English Isn’t a Language, Then Tell Me, What Is? in The New York Times, July 29.Google Scholar
Baron, D. (1990). The English-only Question: An Official Language for Americans? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, D. (2014). America’s War on Language, on The Web of Language blog, September 3.Google Scholar
Baynes, C. (2019). Government “Deported 7,000 Foreign Students after Falsely Accusing Them of Cheating in English Language Tests.” The Independent, June 14.Google Scholar
Bianco, J. L. (1997). English and Pluralistic Policies: The Case of Australia, in Language Policy Dominant English, Pluralist Challenges, eds. Eggington, W. and Wren, H., 107–20. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bourne, J. (1997). “The Grown-ups Know Best”: Language Policy-Making in Britain in the 1990s, in Language Policy: Dominant English, Pluralist challenges, eds. Eggington, W. and Wren, H., 49–65. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar
Clements, G. and Petray, M. J., (2021). Linguistic Discrimination in US Higher Education: Power, Prejudice, Impacts, and Remedies. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davila, B. (2016). The Inevitability of “Standard” English: Discursive Constructions of Standard Language Ideologies. Written Communication, 33(2), 127–48.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. and Li, D. (2009). Indigenous, Minority, and Heritage Language Education in Canada: Policies, Contexts, and Issues. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Dyste, C. (1989). Proposition 63: The California English Language Amendment. Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 313–30.Google Scholar
Gardiner-Garden, J. (1999). From Dispossession to Reconciliation. Research Paper 27. 1998–99. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.Google Scholar
Judd, E. L. (1987). The English Language Amendment: A Case Study on Language and Politics. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 113–35.Google Scholar
Kirkland, E. S. (1883). Speech and Manners for Home and School. Chicago: Jansen, Mcclurg & Company.Google Scholar
Kohler, M. (2017). Review of Languages Education Policies in Australia. Report commissioned by the Multicultural Education and Languages Committee (MELC). Adelaide: Government of South Australia.Google Scholar
Launspach, S. (2021). Conflicting Ideologies: Language Diversity in the Composition Classroom, in Linguistic Discrimination in US Higher Education, eds. Clements, G. and Petray, M. J, 55–73. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mac Síthigh, D. (2018). Official Status of Languages in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Common Law World Review, 47(1), 77–102.Google Scholar
Macedo, D. (2000). The Colonialism of the English-Only Movement. Educational Researcher, 29(3), 15–24.Google Scholar
Marshall, D. F. (1988). Foreign Reactions to American Concerns about the English Only Amendment, in TESOL., paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) in Chicago, Illinois, March 8–13, 1988.Google Scholar
May, S. (2005). Bilingual/immersion Education in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Setting the Context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(5), 365–76.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, M. and Triandafyllidou, A.. (2022). 1 Report Overview: Technological, Geopolitical and Environmental Transformations Shaping Our Migration and Mobility Futures. World Migration Report, 2022(1), e00022.Google Scholar
Metz, M. H. (1989). Real School: A Universal Drama amid Disparate Experience. Politics of Education Association Yearbook, 4(5), 75–91.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R. and Elliot, N. (2020). Ethics, Psychometrics, and Writing Assessment: A Conceptual Model, in After Plato: Rhetoric, Ethics, and the Teaching of Writing, 143–62. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G. (1990). What the Usage Panel Thinks, in The State of the Language, eds. Ricks, C. and Michaels, L., 467–82. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Odell, L., Goswami, D., and Herrington (, A. 1983). The Discourse-based Interview: A Procedure for Exploring the Tacit Knowledge of Writers in Nonacademic Settings, in Research on Writing: Principles and Methods, eds. Mosenthal, P, Tamor, L, and Walmsley, S. A, 221–236. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rae, J. (1982). The Decline and Fall of English Grammar, in The Observer, February 7.Google Scholar
Rafael, V. L. and Pratt, M. L. P. (2021). Introduction. American Quarterly, 73(3), 419–37.Google Scholar
Ramirez, M. (2016). Dual-language Learning Programs on the Rise. The Education Digest, 81(8), 26.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (2014). “Words That You Said Got Bigger”: English Language Learners’ Lived Experiences of Deficit Discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(4), 386–406.Google Scholar
Silber, J. R. (1977). The Need for Elite Education, in Harper’s, June.Google Scholar
Simpson, J., Caffery, J., and McConvell, P. (2009). Gaps in Australia’s Indigenous Language Policy: Dismantling Bilingual Education in the Northern Territory. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) Discussion Paper 24: https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/research_pub/simpson-caffery-mcconvell-dp24-indigenous-language-policy_0_3.pdf.Google Scholar
Smitherman, G. (1998). Ebonics, King, and Oakland: Some Folk Don’t Believe Fat Meat Is Greasy. Journal of English Linguistics, 26(2), 97–107.Google Scholar
Tyack, D. and Tobin, W. (1994). The “Grammar” of Schooling: Why Has It Been so Hard to Change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–79.Google Scholar
Vickers, S. et al. (2021). Split Infinitives: the English “Rule” that Refuses to Quietly Die, in the Guardian, Letters page, July 1.Google Scholar
Wilder, L. and Wolfe, J. (2009). Sharing the Tacit Rhetorical Knowledge of the Literary Scholar: The Effects of Making Disciplinary Conventions Explicit in Undergraduate Writing about Literature Courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(2), 170–209.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. and Lukes, M. (1996). English‐only and Standard English Ideologies in the US. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 511–35.Google Scholar
Hill, A. S., Briggs, L. R., and Hurlbut, B. S. (1896). Twenty Years of School and College English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
House, J. (2012). English as a Lingua Franca and Linguistic Diversity. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1(1), 173–5.Google Scholar
UDLR (1996). Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights: www.egt.ie/udhr/udlr-en.html.Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1925). The Subnormal School Child. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Mann, H. (1845). Boston Grammar and Writing Schools. The Common School Journal, 7(21–3), 321–68.Google Scholar
Mosley, M. (2020). The Great British Intelligence Test, BBC webpage: www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/5tFHwWMgg9VbrHT9kvGlFqd/the-great-british-intelligence-test.Google Scholar
Behizadeh, N. and Engelhard, G., Jr. (2011). Historical View of the Influences of Measurement and Writing Theories on the Practice of Writing Assessment in the United States. Assessing Writing, 16(3), 189–211.Google Scholar
Binet, A. and Simon, T. (1916). The Development of Intelligence in Children. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the Tests Test it. New Republic, 36(1923), 35–7.Google Scholar
Brigham, C. C. (1923). A Study of American Intelligence. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1914). The Measurement of Intelligence by the Binet Tests: Part II. The Eugenics Review, 6(2), 140–52.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. S. (2016). Harvard’s Eugenics Era. Harvard Magazine, 118(4), 48–52.Google Scholar
Eliot, C. W. (1869). Addresses at the Inauguration of Charles William Eliot as President of Harvard College. October 19. Cambridge, MA: Sever and Francis.Google Scholar
Eliot, C. W. (1898). Educational Reform: Essays and Addresses. New York: The Century Co.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (2019). Composing Progress in the United States: Race Science, Social Justice, and the Rhetorics of Writing Assessment, 1845–1859. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hillegas, M. (1912). Scale for the Measurement of Quality in English Composition by Young People: The Location of the Zero Point for English Composition. Teachers College Record, 13(4), 12–14.Google Scholar
Hudelson, E. (1923). The Development and Comparative Values of Composition Scales. The English Journal, 12(3), 163–8.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. W. (1913). The Hillegas-Thorndike Scale for Measurement of Quality in English Composition by Young People. The School Review, 21(1), 39–49.Google Scholar
Kayfetz, I. (1914). A Critical study of the Hillegas Composition Scale. The Pedagogical Seminary, 21(4), 559–77.Google Scholar
Leslie, M. (2000). The Vexing Legacy of Lewis Terman. Stanford Magazine, July/August.Google Scholar
Logan, S. W. (2008). Liberating Language: Sites of Rhetorical Education in Nineteenth-Century Black America. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Lunsford, A. A. (1986). The Past and Future of Writing Assessment, in Writing Assessment: Issues and Strategies, eds. Greenberg, K. L, Wiener, H. S, and Donovan, R. A, 1–12. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Mann, H. (1887). A Few Thoughts for a Young Man. Boston, MA: Lee and Shepard.Google Scholar
Messerli, J. (1972). Horace Mann: A Biography. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
New England Association of Teachers of English ( 1913). The Hillegas Scale. Leaflet no. 104. Cambridge, MA: New England Association of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Reese, W. J. (2013). Testing Wars in the Public Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence,” Objectively Determined and Measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–92.Google Scholar
Stoddard, W. (1916). A Comparison of the Hillegas and Harvard-Newton Scales in English Composition. The Pedagogical Seminary, 23(4), 498–501.Google Scholar
Stout, D. and Stuart, S. (1991). E. G. Boring’s Review of Brigham’s A Study of American Intelligence: A Case-Study in the Politics of Reviews. Social Studies of Science, 21(1), 133–42.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1916). The Measurement of Intelligence: An Explanation of and a Complete Guide for the Use of the Stanford Revision and Extension of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Scale. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin company.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1904). An Introduction to the Theory of Mental and Social Measurements. New York: Teacher’s College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Notes on the Significance and Use of the Hillegas Scale for Measuring the Quality of English Composition. The English Journal, 2(9), 551–61.Google Scholar
Yerkes, R. M. (1923). Foreword, in A Study of American Intelligence, ed. Brigham, C. C., i–viii. Princeton; London: Princeton University Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. S. (2016). Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Connors, R. J. and Lunsford, A. A. (1988). Frequency of Formal Errors in Current College Writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle Do Research. College Composition and Communication, 39(4), 395–409.Google Scholar
Elliot, N. (2005). On a Scale: A Social History of Writing Assessment in America. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-mindedness. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1996). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2007). The Impact of Testing Practices on Teaching, in International Handbook of English Language Teaching, eds. Cummins, J and Davison, C, 487–504. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Lombardo, P. A. ( 2003). Facing Carrie Buck. The Hastings Center Report, 33(2), 14–17.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R. J. (2018). Sociocognitive Foundations of Educational Measurement. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, J. E. (1903). The Educational Value of Examinations for Admission to College. The School Review, 11(1), 42–54.Google Scholar
Ulrich, L. T. (1999). Harvard’s Womanless History. Harvard Magazine, 102, 50–9.Google Scholar
Walsh, C. (2012). Hard-earned Gains for Women at Harvard. Harvard Gazette, 4, 26.Google Scholar
Wright, K. (2017). Inventing the “Normal” Child: Psychology, Delinquency, and the Promise of Early Intervention. History of the Human Sciences, 30(5), 46–67.Google Scholar
Dryer, D. B. (2015). Writing Is Unnatural, in Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies, eds. Adler-Kassner, L. and Wardle, E., Denver, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Locust, C. (1988). Wounding the Spirit: Discrimination and Traditional American Indian Belief Systems. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 315–31.Google Scholar
Mercer, J.R., (2022). Labeling the Mentally Retarded: Clinical and Social System Perspectives on Mental Retardation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R. J. (1997). Postmodern Test Theory, in Transitions in Work and Learning: Implications for Assessment, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academic of Sciences National Research Council.Google Scholar
Perelman, L. C. (2013). Critique of Mark D. Shermis & Ben Hammer, Contrasting State-of-the-art Automated Scoring of Essays: Analysis. Journal of Writing Assessment, 6(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Royster, J. J., (1996). When the First Voice You Hear Is not Your Own. College Composition and Communication, 47(1), 29–40.Google Scholar
Samuda, R. J. (1998). Psychological Testing of American Minorities: Issues and Consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schuster, C., (1990). The Ideology of Literacy: A Bakhtinian Perspective, in The Right to Literacy, eds. Lunsford, A. A., Moglen, H., and Slevin, J., 225–32. New York: The Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Von Stumm, S. and Plomin, R. (2015). Socioeconomic Status and the Growth of Intelligence from Infancy through Adolescence. Intelligence, 48, 30–6.Google Scholar
Bardell, G. S., Forrest, G. M., and Shoesmith (, D. 1978). Comparability in GCE: A Review of the Boards’ Studies; 1964–1977. Joint Matriculation Board.Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1945). The Reliability of Teachers’ Assessments of the Pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(2), 80–92.Google Scholar
Crofts, J. M. and Jones, D. C. (1928). Secondary School Examination Statistics: Prefaced by a Simple Introduction to Statistical Methods. London: Longmans, Green and Company, Limited.Google Scholar
Tattersall, K., (2007). A Brief History of Policies, Practices and Issues Relating to Comparability: Techniques for Monitoring the Comparability of Examination Standards, 43–96: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/487051/2007-comparability-exam-standards-d-chapter2.pdf.Google Scholar
Barker, D. G. (1967). The History of Entrance Examinations. Improving College and University Teaching, 15(4), 250–3.Google Scholar
Berlin, J. (1984). Writing Instruction in Nineteenth-century American Colleges. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Connors, R. J. (1997). Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Goldin, C. and Katz, L. F., (1999). The Shaping of Higher Education: The Formative Years in the United States, 1890 to 1940. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 37–62.Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, F. J. C. (1929). The Centenary History of King’s College, London, 1828–1928. London: G. G. Harrap.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. (2016). Can You Answer These Questions From the Original SAT?, in Time, June 20.Google Scholar
Jones, G. A. (2014). An Introduction to Higher Education in Canada, in Higher Education Across Nations, eds. Joshi, K. M and Paivandi, S, vol. 1, 1–38. Delhi: B. R. Publishing.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2019). A Century of Change in High School English Assessments: An Analysis of 110 New York State Regents Exams, 1900–2018. Research in the Teaching of English, 54(1), 31–57.Google Scholar
Mann, H. (1854). Dedication of Antioch College, and Inaugural Address of Its President, Hon. Horace Mann: With Other Proceedings. Yellow Springs, Boston: A. S. Dean.Google Scholar
Morris, G. P. (1900). Twenty-five Years of Woman’s Higher Education: An Interview with President L. Clark Scelye of Smith College, in Congregationalist (1891–1901), 404. Boston: American Periodicals Series II.Google Scholar
Snyder, T. D. (1993). 120 Years of American Education: A Statistical Portrait. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
Stedman, L. C. (2008). The NAEP Long-term Trend Assessment: A Review of its Transformation, Use, and Findings. Paper Commissioned for the 20th Anniversary of the National Assessment Governing Board 1988–2008.Google Scholar
Stray, C., (2001). The Shift from Oral to Written Examination: Cambridge and Oxford 1700–1900. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(1), 33–50.Google Scholar
Trachsel, M. (1992). Institutionalizing Literacy: The Historical Role of College Entrance Examinations in English. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, (1893). English Composition Examiner Report.Google Scholar
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (1904). Forty-Sixth Annual Report of the Local Examinations,Google Scholar
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (1913). English Composition Examiner Report. p. xvii.Google Scholar
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (2008). How Have School Exams Changed over the Past 150 Years?Google Scholar
Vaughan, G. B. (1985). The Community College in America: A Short History. Revised. Washington, DC: American Association of Community and Junior Colleges.Google Scholar
Watts, A. (2008). Cambridge Local Examinations 1858–1945, in Examining the World: A History of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, ed. Raban, S, 36–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, A. (2008). Turn Your Papers Over. History Today, 58(8).Google Scholar
Webb, S. (1902). London University: A Policy and a Forecast. The Nineteenth Century and After: A Monthly Review, 51(304), 914–31.Google Scholar
Anderson, P., et al., (2015). The Contributions of Writing to Learning and Development: Results from a Large-scale Multi-institutional Study. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 199–235.Google Scholar
Applebee, A. and Langer, J. (2011). “EJ” Extra: A Snapshot of Writing Instruction in Middle Schools and High Schools. The English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.Google Scholar
Arum, R. and Roksa, J. (2011). Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aull, L. L. (Forthcoming). Attention to Language in Composition. Composition Forum.Google Scholar
Bain, A., (1866). English Composition and Rhetoric: A Manual (rev. American ed.). New York: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
Beaufort, A. (2007). College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
Blodget, A. (2019). It’s Time to End Timed Tests, in Education Week, September 30.Google Scholar
Brereton, J. (1996). The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College, 1875–1925. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1921). Mental and Scholastic Tests. Report by the Education Officer Submitting Three Memoranda by Mr. Cyril Burt. London: P. S. King and Son Ltd.Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1945). The Reliability of Teachers’ Assessments of their Pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(2), 80–92.Google Scholar
Carter, D., Manuel, J., and Dutton (, J. 2018). How Do Secondary School English Teachers Score NAPLAN?: A Snapshot of English Teachers’ Views. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(3), 144–54.Google Scholar
Connors, R. J. (1999). Composition History and Disciplinarity, in History, Reflection, and Narrative: The Professionalization of Composition, 1963–1983, eds. Rosner, M., Boehm, B., and Journet, D.. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Connors, R., Lisa, S. Ede & Andrea, A. Lunsford. (1984). “The Revival of Rhetoric in America.” Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse. Ed. Connors, Ede & Lunsford. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press, 1984: 1–15Google Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, J., ed. (2006). The Social Construction of Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dance, C. (2017). An Oxford Exam from 1884, from Dance’s Historical Miscellany: www.danceshistoricalmiscellany.com/an-oxford-exam-from-1884/.Google Scholar
Gannon, S. (2019). Teaching Writing in the NAPLAN Era: The Experiences of Secondary English Teachers. English in Australia, 54(2), 43–56.Google Scholar
Haswell, R. H. (2012). Methodologically Adrift. College Composition and Communication, 63(3), 487–91.Google Scholar
Locke, T. (2010). Beyond the Grammar Wars. A Resource for Teachers and Students on Developing Language Knowledge in English/Literacy Classroom. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luce-Kapler, R. and Klinger (, D. 2005.) Uneasy Writing: The Defining Moments of High-stakes Literacy Testing. Assessing Writing, 10(3), 157–73.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S. P. (2007). The Erasure of Language. College Composition and Communication, 58(4), 585–625.Google Scholar
Moore, C. ( 2011). History of the English Language in the English Department: Past and Present, in Contours of English and English Language Studies, eds. Adams, M. and Curzan, A., 157–67. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Oxford University Gazette (1870). Oxford University Gazette. Vols.1–2 (1870–1872).Google Scholar
Ross, A. (2001). What is the Curriculum? In Developing Pedagogy: Researching Practice, ed. Collins, J, Soler, J and Insley, K, 122–31. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Who Are the Bright Children? The Cultural Context of Being and Acting Intelligent. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 148–55.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2022). The Search for the Elusive Basic Processes Underlying Human Intelligence: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2):28: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10020028.Google Scholar
UK Government (2021). Proposed Changes to the Assessment of GCSEs, AS and A Levels in 2022. Updated September 30, 2021:www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposed-changes-to-the-assessment-of-gcses-as-and-a-levels-in-2022/proposed-changes-to-the-assessment-of-gcses-as-and-a-levels-in-2022.Google Scholar
Watts, A. (2008). Cambridge local examinations 1858–1945. Examining the World: A History of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, pps 36–71.Google Scholar
Watts, A. (2019). School Certificate Examinations in England, 1918–1950. A Historical Investigation of the Formation and Maintenance of a National Examination System: Examination Boards, Teachers and the State: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.43215.Google Scholar
Winterowd, W. R. ( 1998,). The English Department: A Personal and Institutional History. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Zwick, R. (2017). Who Gets In?: Strategies for Fair and Effective College Admissions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ädel, A., (2008). Involvement Features in Writing: Do Time and Interaction Trump Register Awareness? in Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, 35–53. Leiden: Brill Publishing.Google Scholar
Au, K. H. (2006). Multicultural Issues and Literacy Achievement. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Aull, L.L., (2017). Corpus Analysis of Argumentative Versus Explanatory Discourse in Writing Task Genres. Journal of Writing Analytics, 1(1), 1–47.Google Scholar
Aull, L.L., (2019). Linguistic Markers of Stance and Genre in Upper-level Student Writing. Written Communication, 36(2), 267–95.Google Scholar
Bejar, I. I. (2017). A Historical Survey of Research Regarding Constructed-response Formats, in Advancing Human Assessment, eds. Bennett, R. E. and von Davier, M., 565–633. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Cambridge, University of. (1870). Examination for Women. Examination Papers, with Lists of Syndics and Examiners: https://archive.org/details/examinationforw00unkngoog/page/n7/mode/2up.Google Scholar
Coates, H. (2007). Developing Generalizable Measures of Knowledge and Skill Outcomes in Higher Education. Paper delivered at the Proceedings of AUQF2007: Evolution and Renewal In Quality Assurance, Hobart, Australia, July 11–13, 2007.Google Scholar
Deane, P., O’Reilly, T, Chao, S-F, and Dreier, K (2018). Writing Processes in Short Written Responses to Questions Probing Prior Knowledge. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Dilnot, C. (2016). How Does the Choice of A‐level Subjects Vary with Students’ Socio‐economic Status in English State Schools? British Educational Research Journal, 42(6), 1081–1106.Google Scholar
Ede, L. S. and Lunsford, A. A. (1990). Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Elgin, S. H. (1976). Why “Newsweek” Can’t Tell us Why Johnny Can’t Write. The English Journal, 65(8), 29–35.Google Scholar
Elliot, N. (2016). A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment. Journal of Writing Assessment, 9(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Gere, A. R. et al. (2013). Local Assessment: Using Genre Analysis to Validate Directed Self-Placement. College Composition and Communication, 4(64), 605–33.Google Scholar
Huot, B. and Williamson (, M. M. 1997). Rethinking Portfolios for Evaluating Writing, in Situating Portfolios: Four Perspectives, eds. Yancey, K. B. and Weiser, I.. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
Judy, S. (1977). On Second Thought: Reviewing the SAT Decline. The English Journal, 66(8), 5–7.Google Scholar
Kamenetz, A. (2015). The Test: Why Our Schools are Obsessed with Standardized Testing – But You Don’t Have to Be. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Kelly-Riley, D. and Elliot, N. (2014). The WPA Outcomes Statement, Validation, and the Pursuit of Localism. Assessing Writing, 21, 89–103.Google Scholar
Labov, W. and Waletzky, J (1997). Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 3–38.Google Scholar
Lunsford, A. A. (2013). Our Semi-literate Youth? Not So Fast. Report. Stanford University: www.stanford.Edu/group/ssw/cgi-bin/materials/OPED_Our_Semi-Literate_Youth.Pdf.Google Scholar
Lunsford, A. A., Fishman, J., and Liew, W. M.. (2013). College Writing, Identification, and the Production of Intellectual Property: Voices from the Stanford Study of Writing. College English, 75(5), 470–92.Google Scholar
Marini, J.P., et al. (2019). Validity of SAT® Essay Scores for Predicting First-Year Grades. New York: College Board.Google Scholar
Mary, B., Wade, M., and Sarah, P. (2004). Assessment as Opportunity: A Conversation with Brian Huot. Issues in Writing, 14(2), 94–115.Google Scholar
Olinghouse, N. G., Graham, S., and Gillespie, A. (2015). The Relationship of Discourse and Topic Knowledge to Fifth Graders’ Writing Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 391–406.Google Scholar
Perelman, L. (2012). Construct Validity, Length, Score, and Time in Holistically Graded Writing Assessments: The Case against Automated Essay Scoring (AES). In International Advances in Writing Research: Cultures, Places, Measures, eds. Bazerman, C et al., 121–31. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
Poe, M. and Elliot, N., (2019). Evidence of Fairness: Twenty-five Years of Research in Assessing Writing. Assessing Writing, 42, 100418.Google Scholar
Poe, M., Eliot, N, Gogan, J. A, Jr., and Nurudeen, T. G, Jr. (2014). The Legal and the Local: Using Disparate Impact Analysis to Understand the Consequences of Writing Assessment. College Composition and Communication, 65(4), 588–611.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. (1981). Personal Narratives Reconsidered. The Journal of American Folklore, 94(371), 58–85.Google Scholar
Rothman, T. and Henderson, M., (2011). Do School-based Tutoring Programs Significantly Improve Student Performance on Standardized Tests? RMLE Online, 34(6), 1–10.Google Scholar
Smith, K. G., Girdharry, K., and Gallagher, C. W. (2021). Writing Transfer, Integration, and the Need for the Long View. College Composition and Communication, 73(1), 4–26.Google Scholar
Snyderman, M. and Rothman, S. (1987). Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence and Aptitude Testing. American Psychologist, 42(2), 137.Google Scholar
Von Stumm, S. et al. (2020). Predicting Educational Achievement from Genomic Measures and Socioeconomic Status. Developmental Science, 23(3), e12925.Google Scholar
Yancey, K. B. and Weiser, I (eds.) (1997). Situating Portfolios: Four Perspectives. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
Zwick, R. (2019). Assessment in American Higher Education: The Role of Admissions Tests. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 130–48.Google Scholar
Baker, J. (2020). Writing Wrongs: “Our Society Is About to Hit a Literacy Crisis,” in The Sydney Morning Herald, September 19.Google Scholar
Clare, J. (2002). New Cambridge Students “Can’t Write English,” in The Telegraph, July 16.Google Scholar
Fahey, G. (2020). Wrestling the Writing Decline Key to Education Improvement, The Canberra Times, September 20: www.cis.org.au/commentary/opinion/wrestling-the-writing-decline-key-to-education-improvement/.Google Scholar
Sheils, M. (1975). Why Johnny Can’t Write, in Newsweek, December 8: www.leetorda.com/uploads/2/3/2/5/23256940/why_johnny_cant_write__newsweek_1975___1_.pdf.Google Scholar
Wilce, H. (2006). University Students: They Can’t Write, Spell or Present an Argument, in The Independent, May 24.Google Scholar
Aull, L.L (2021). What AP Scorers Shouldn’t Grade, in Inside Higher Education, July 25.Google Scholar
Benjamin, R., et al., (2009). Returning to Learning in an Age of Assessment: Introducing the Rationale of the Collegiate Learning Assessment. New York: CAE.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. (1993). Mechanical Correctness and Ritual in the Late Nineteenth-Century Composition Classroom. Rhetoric Review, 11(2), 436–55.Google Scholar
Farkas, G. (2011). American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 1000–2.Google Scholar
McConnell, K. D. (2011). Review of “Academically Adrift.” Research & Practice in Assessment, 6, 40–2.Google Scholar
Association of American Colleges and Universities (2009). Written Communication VALUE Rubric: wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-success-postsecondary-writing.pdf.Google Scholar
Curzan, A. ( 2009.) Says Who? Teaching and Questioning the Rules of Grammar. PMLA, 124(3), 870–9.Google Scholar
Council of Writing Program Administrators, the National Council of Teachers of English, and the National Writing Project. (2011). Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing: wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-success-postsecondary-writing.pdf.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2002). Literacies, Identities, and Discourses. Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning with Power, 159–75.Google Scholar
Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Minnis, M. (1994 ). Toward a Definition of Law School Readiness, in Sociocultural Approaches to Language and Literacy: An Interactionist Perspective, eds. John-Steiner, V, Panofsky, C. P and Smith, L. W, 347–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohmann, R. (2003). Politics of Knowledge: The Commercialization of the University, the Professions, and Print Culture. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful Intelligence: A Model for Testing Intelligence beyond IQ Tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(2), 76–84.Google Scholar
Williams, B. T. (2007). Why Johnny Can Never, Ever Read: The Perpetual Literacy Crisis and Student Identity. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(2), 178–82.Google Scholar
Applebee, A. et al. (1990). The Writing Report Card, 1984–88: Findings from the Nation’s Report Card. Princton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress.Google Scholar
Aull, L. L., Bandarage, D. and Miller, M. R. (2017). Generality in Student and Expert Epistemic Stance: A Corpus Analysis of First-year, Upper-level, and Published Academic Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 29–41.Google Scholar
Brereton, J. (2012). A Closer Look at the Harvard Entrance Examinations in the 1870s, in Writing Assessment in the 21st Century: Essays in Honor of Edward M. White, eds. Elliot, N. and Perelman, L., 31–43. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Brown, D. W. and Aull, L. L. (2017). Elaborated Specificity versus Emphatic Generality: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Higher-and Lower-Scoring Advanced Placement Exams in English. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(4), 394–417.Google Scholar
Cook, Margaret, plus editors. (2007). Can’t Write Can’t Spell…, in The Age, February 26.Google Scholar
Godstein, D. (2017). Why Kids Can’t Write, in The New York Times, August 2.Google Scholar
Haswell, R. and Elliot, N. (2019). Early Holistic Scoring of Writing: A Theory, a History, a Reflection. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
James, C. L. (2008). Electronic Scoring of Essays: Does Topic Matter? Assessing Writing,. 13(2), 80–92.Google Scholar
Kellaghan, T. and Greaney, V. (2019). Public Examinations Examined. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Lunsford, A. A. and Lunsford, K. J. (2008). “Mistakes Are a Fact of Life”: A National Comparative Study. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 781–806.Google Scholar
National Association for College Admission Counseling and National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators ( 2022). Toward a More Equitable Future for Postsecondary Access.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). National Assessment of Educational Progress 2017 Writing, May 10: https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/writing/2017writing.aspx.Google Scholar
Stedman, L. C., Mullis, I. V., and Timpane, M., (1998). An Assessment of the Contemporary Debate over US Achievement. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, (1), 53–121.Google Scholar
Applebee, A. and Langer, J. (2011). The National Study of Writing Instruction: Methods and Procedures. Albany, NY: Center on English Learning & Achievement.Google Scholar
Applebee, A. N. and Langer, J. A. (2011). “EJ” Extra: A Snapshot of Writing Instruction in Middle Schools and High Schools. The English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.Google Scholar
Applebee, A. N. and Langer, J. A. (2013). Writing Instruction that Works: Proven Methods for Middle and High School Classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Aull, L. L. (2015). Connecting Writing and Language in Assessment: Examining Style, Tone, and Argument in the US Common Core Standards and in Exemplary Student Writing. Assessing Writing, 24, 59–73.Google Scholar
Aull, L. L. (2018). Generality and Certainty in Undergraduate Writing Over Time, in Developing Writers in Higher Education: A Longitudinal Study, ed. Gere, A. R. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Aull, L. L. and Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Comparison. Written Communication, 1(33), 151–83.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. N. and Lowry, E. (2017). The Five-paragraph Essay Transmits Knowledge, in Bad ideas About Writing, eds. Ball, C. E. and Loewe, D. M., 214–19. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Libraries Digital Publishing Institute.Google Scholar
Borman, G. D. and Dowling, N. M. (2008). Teacher Attrition and Retention: A Meta-analytic and Narrative Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367–409.Google Scholar
Cambridge Assessment and Research. (2008). “How have school exams changed over the past 150 years?” Accessed July 2022. www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/news/how-have-school-exams-changed-over-the-past-150-years/.Google Scholar
Clark, I. L. and Hernandez (, A. 2011). Genre Awareness, Academic Argument, and Transferability. The WAC Journal, 22, 65–78.Google Scholar
Geiger, T. and Pivovarova, M. (2018). The Effects of Working Conditions on Teacher Retention. Teachers and Teaching, 24(6), 604–25.Google Scholar
Gibbons, S. (2019). “Death by PEEL?” The Teaching of Writing in the Secondary English Classroom in England. English in Education, 53(1), 36–45.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2019). Changing How Writing Is Taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303.Google Scholar
Hillocks, G., (2002). The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., and Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching Writing to High School Students: A National Survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–60.Google Scholar
Kobrin, J. L., Deng, H., and Shaw, E. J. (2011). The Association between SAT Prompt Characteristics, Response Features, and Essay Scores. Assessing Writing, 16(3), 154–69.Google Scholar
Macbeth, K. P. (2010). Deliberate False Provisions: The Use and Usefulness of Models in Learning Academic Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(1), 33–48.Google Scholar
Mason, S. and Matas, C. P. (2015). Teacher Attrition and Retention Research in Australia: Towards a New Theoretical Framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 40(11), 45–66.Google Scholar
Melzer, D. (2009). Writing Assignments across the Curriculum: A National Study of College Writing. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), W240–W261.Google Scholar
Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., and Wyckoff, J. (2013). How Teacher Turnover Harms Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, P. (2009). A Short History of Educational Reform in Finland. White Paper, April.Google Scholar
See, B. H., Morris, R, Gorard, S, and Kokotsaki, D (2020). Teacher Recruitment and Retention: A Critical Review of International Evidence of Most Promising Interventions. Education Sciences, 10(10), 262–307.Google Scholar
Soliday, M. (2002). The Politics of Remediation: Institutional and Student Needs in Higher Education. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., and Carver-Thomas, D. (2016). A Coming Crisis in Teaching? Teacher Supply, Demand, and Shortages in the US. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Thaiss, C. and Zawacki, T. M. (2006). Engaged Writers Dynamic Disciplines: Research on the Academic Writing Life. Porstmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2019). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Devitt, A. J. (2007). Transferability and Genres, in The Locations of Composition, eds. Keller, C. J. and Weisser, C. R., 215–27. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Driscoll, D. L. et al. (2020). Genre Knowledge and Writing Development: Results from the Writing Transfer Project. Written Communication, 37(1), 69–103.Google Scholar
Jarratt, S., Mack, K, Sartor, A, and Watson, S. E (2007). Pedagogical Memory and the Transferability of Writing Knowledge: An Interview-based Study of UCI Juniors and Seniors. Irvine, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Miller, S. (1991). Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illionois University Press.Google Scholar
Rounsaville, A., Goldberg, R., and Bawarshi, A. (2008). From Incomes to Outcomes: FYW Students’ Prior Genre Knowledge, Meta-cognition, and the Question of Transfer. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 1(32), 97–112.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P., (2015). The UnEssay: Making Room for Creativity in the Composition Classroom. College Composition and Communication, 67(1), 6–34.Google Scholar
Wardle, E. (2009). “Mutt Genres” and the Goal of FYC: Can We Help Students Write the Genres of the University? College Composition and Communication, 60(4), 765–89.Google Scholar
Wingate, U. and Tribble, C. (2012). The Best of Both Worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic Literacies Writing Pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 481–95.Google Scholar
Ädel, A. (2014). Selecting Quantitative Data for Qualitative Analysis: A Case Study Connecting a Lexicogrammatical Pattern to Rhetorical Moves. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 68–80.Google Scholar
Adler-Kassner, L. and Wardle, E. (2015). Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies. Denver, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Adler-Kassner, L. and O’Neill, P. (2010). Reframing Writing Assessment to Improve Teaching and Learning. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
Anson, C. M. (2016). The Pop Warner Chronicles: A Case Study in Contextual Adaptation and the Transfer of Writing Ability. College Composition and Communication, 67(4), 518–49.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. et al. (2018). The Lifespan Development of Writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Brown, D. W. and Aull (, L. L. 2017). Elaborated Specificity vs. Emphatic Generality: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Higher and Lower Scoring Advanced Placement Exams in English. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(4), 394–417.Google Scholar
Cheng, A. (2007). Transferring Generic Features and Recontextualizing Genre Awareness: Understanding Writing Performance in the ESP Genre-based Literacy Framework. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 287–307.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. W. and Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic Development of Action, Thought, and Emotion, in Theoretical Models of Human Development: Handbook of Child Psychology, eds. Damon, W and Learner, R. M, vol. I, 313–99. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Granville, S. and Dison, L. (2005). Thinking about Thinking: Integrating Self-reflection Into an Academic Literacy Course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(2), 99–118.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies,. 7(2), 173–92.Google Scholar
James, M. A. (2014). Learning Transfer in English-for-Academic-Purposes Contexts: A Systematic Review of Research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 1–13.Google Scholar
Jarratt, S. C., Mack, K, Sartor, A, and Watson, S. E. (2009). Pedagogical Memory: Writing, Mapping, Translating. Writing Program Administration, 33(1–2), 46–73.Google Scholar
Keen, J. (1997). Grammar, Metalanguage, and Writing Development. Teacher Development. 3(1), 431–45.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Z. (2016). Do Academics Really Write This Way? A Corpus Investigation of Moves and Templates in “They Say/I Say.” College Composition and Communication, 67(3), 437–64.Google Scholar
Macken-Horarik, M. (2009). Navigational Metalanguages for New Territory in English: The Potential of Grammatics. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 55–69.Google Scholar
Matsuda, P. K. and Tardy, C. M., (2007). Voice in Academic Writing: The Rhetorical Construction of Author Identity in Blind Manuscript Review. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 235–49.Google Scholar
Meizlish, D., LaVaque-Manty, D., and Silver, N. (2013). Think Like/Write Like, in Changing the Conversation About Higher Education, ed. Thompson, R.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in Student Academic Writing. Written Communication,. 29(2), 142–79.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. (2017). The Student Laboratory Report Genre: A Genre Analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 1–13.Google Scholar
Ritter, K. (2009). Before Shaughnessy: Basic Writing at Yale and Harvard, 1920–1960. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., and Parr, A. (2013). Worlds Apart: Acting and Writing in Academic and Workplace Contexts. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dursun, A., Morris, J. K., and Ünaldı, A. (2020). Designing Proficiency-oriented Performance Tasks for the 21st-century Workplace Written Communication: An Evidence-centered Design Approach. Assessing Writing, 46 (October).Google Scholar
Schneider, B. and Andre, J.-A. (1973) (2005). University Preparation for Workplace Writing: An Exploratory Study of the Perceptions of Students in Three Disciplines. The Journal of Business Communication, 42(2), 195–218.Google Scholar
Spilka, R. (1998). Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Aley, R. (1915). “The College and the Freshman.” School and Society, 2(31), 152–4.Google Scholar
Anson, C. M. and Forsberg, L. L. (1990). Moving Beyond the Academic Community: Transitional Stages in Professional Writing. Written Communication, 7(2), 200–31.Google Scholar
Aull, L. L. and Ross, V. (2020). From Cow Paths to Conversation: Rethinking the Argumentative Essay. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 20(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
Barnard, H. C. (1947). A Short History of English Education from 1760 to 1944. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. et al., eds. (2009). Traditions of Writing Research. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. Google Scholar
Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, J., Elliot, N., and Molloy, H. (2016). Informing Automated Writing Evaluation using the Lens of Genre: Two Studies. Calico Journal, 33(1), 117–41.Google Scholar
Chambers, W. (1876). Getting On, in Chambers’s Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Arts, June, 353–5.Google Scholar
Cox, M., Ortmeier-Hooper, C., and Tirabassi, K. E. (2009). Teaching Writing for the “Real World”: Community and Workplace Writing. English Journal, 98(5), 72–80.Google Scholar
Eliot, C. W. (1915). Educational Evolution. School and Society, 1(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Engle, J. (2007). Postsecondary Access and Success for First-generation College Students. American Academic, 3(1), 25–48.Google Scholar
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Petterson, M, Gere, A. R, and Schultz, G. V (2021). Praxis of Writing-to-Learn: A Model for the Design and Propagation of Writing-to-Learn in STEM. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1548–55.Google Scholar
Graff, H. J. (1991). The Literacy Myth: Cultural Integration and Social Structure in the Nineteenth Century. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Gubala, C., Larson, K., and Melonçon, L. (2020). Do Writing Errors Bother Professionals? An Analysis of the Most Bothersome Errors and How the Writer’s Ethos Is Affected. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34(3), 250–86.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, K. (2017). Editor’s Introduction: Assessing the Value of Experiential Learning in Community-Engaged Projects. Open Words: Access and English Studies, 10(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
Jansen, F. (2012). The Putative Email Style and its Explanations: Evidence from Two Effect Studies of Dutch Direct Email Letters and Direct Marketing Emails. Language@ Internet, 9(2).Google Scholar
Lanctot, A. M. (2019). You’ve Got Mail, But Is It Important And/Or Urgent?: An Investigation into Employees’ Perceptions of Email. Doctoral thesis. Carleton University.Google Scholar
McCulloch, G. (2020). Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Meloncon, L. and Henschel, S. (2013). Current State of US Undergraduate Degree Programs in Technical and Professional Communication. Technical Communication, 60(1), 45–64.Google Scholar
Mirel, B. (1996). Writing and Database Technology: Extending the Definition of Writing in the Workplace. Electronic Literacies in the Workplace: Technologies of Writing, 91–112.Google Scholar
Moral and Entertaining Magazine editors (1779). The Lazy Lover: A Moral Tale, in The Moral and Entertaining Magazine.Google Scholar
Myers, D. 1800. (1980). Scottish Schoolmasters in the Nineteenth Century: Professionalism and Politics, in Scottish Culture and Scottish Education, 1800–1980, eds. Humes, W. M and Paterson, H. M. Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
Nevins, A. (1962). The Origins of the Land-grant Colleges and State Universities: A Brief Account of the Morrill Act of 1862 and its Results. Washington, DC: Civil War Centennial Commission.Google Scholar
Ochsner, R. and Fowler, J. (2004). Playing Devil’s Advocate: Evaluating the Literature of the WAC/WID Movement. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 117–40.Google Scholar
Pigg, S. and Berger, A. (2020). Still “Worlds Apart”? Early-Career Writing Learning as a Cross-Field Opportunity. College English, 82(5), 507–14.Google Scholar
Rogers, P. (2009). The Contributions of North American Longitudinal Studies of Writing in Higher Education to our Understanding of Writing Development, in Traditions of Writing Research, ed. Bazerman, C., et al., Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. Google Scholar
Rosebury, K. G. (1902). Inaugural Address of the Earl of Rosebery, K. G., to the University of Glasgow, November 16, 1900. The Edinburgh Review, 195(399), 58–78.Google Scholar
Sherrill, J. E. (1879). The Normal Teacher. Danville, IN: J. E. Sherrill.Google Scholar
Skovholt, K., Grønning, A., and Kankaanranta, A. (2014). The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-mails. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 780–97.Google Scholar
Stuckey-French, N. (2011). The American Essay in the American Century. Columbia, MI: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Waldvogel, J. (2007). Greetings and Closings in Workplace Email. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 456–77.Google Scholar
Beason, L. (2001). Ethos and Error: How Businesspeople React to Errors. College Composition and Communication, 53(1), 33–64.Google Scholar
Defazio, J., Jones, J, Tennant, F, and Hook, S. A (2010). Academic Literacy: The Importance and Impact of Writing across the Curriculum – A Case Study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 34–47.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (2022). Wonking Out: Education Has Less to Do with Inequality than You Think, in The New York Times, April 29.Google Scholar
Penrose, A. M. (2002). Academic Literacy Perceptions and Performance: Comparing First-generation and Continuing-generation College Students. Research in the Teaching of English, 36(4), 437–61.Google Scholar
Singletary, M. (2015). College Costs Aren’t Always Worth it, Alumni say, So Think before Borrowing, in The Washington Post, September 30.Google Scholar
Al Hilali, T. S. and McKinley, J., (2021). Exploring the Socio-contextual Nature of Workplace Writing: Towards Preparing Learners for the Complexities of English L2 Writing in the Workplace. English for Specific Purposes, 63 (3), 86–97.Google Scholar
American Management Association (2019). AMA Critical Skills Survey: Workers Need Higher-level Skills to Succeed in the 21st Century.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C., and Planken, B. (2013). What is Business Discourse?, in Business Discourse, eds. Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C., and Planken, B, 3–44. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ede, L. S. and Lunsford, A. A. (1992). Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Paré, A. (2002). Keeping Writing in its Place: A Participatory Action Approach to Workplace Communication, in Reshaping Technical Communication, eds. Mirel, B and Spilka, R, 75–98. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stafford, J. (1974). At This Point in Time, TV Is Murdering the English Language, in The New York Times, September 15: www.nytimes.com/1974/09/15/archives/at-this-point-in-time-tv-is-murdering-the-english-language.html.Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative Writing: Product, Process, and Students’ Reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–73.Google Scholar
Clark, L. (2012). Text Message Slang “Invading GCSEs and A-levels” as Teenagers Abandon Basic Grammar and Punctuation, in the Daily Mail, October 23.Google Scholar
Grace, A., et al. (2015). Undergraduates’ Attitudes to Text Messaging Language Use and Intrusions of Textisms into Formal Writing. New Media & Society, 17(5), 792–809.Google Scholar
Guardian Staff, (1978). Further Uses of Literacy, in the Guardian. https://theguardian.newspapers.com/search/?query=further%20uses%20of%20literacy&dr_year=1978-1978.Google Scholar
John, A. (2013). The Internet Is Making Writing Worse, in The Atlantic, July 17.Google Scholar
Media, C. S. (2015). The Common-sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens. Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W. (1976). Confronting the Literacy Crisis. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. (2009). English Academic Style Manuals: A Survey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(1), 43–54.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems (Athens, OH: Swallow Press).Google Scholar
Eisenstein, E. L. (1980). The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. J., Bychkovska, T., and Maxwell, J. D. (2019). Breaking the Rules? A Corpus-based Comparison of Informal Features in L1 and L2 Undergraduate Student Writing. System, 80, 143–53.Google Scholar
Murray, D. E. (2000). Changing Technologies, Changing Literacy Communities? Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 39–53.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. (2009). Clive Thompson on the New Literacy. Wired, 17(9), August 24.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2006). From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive Construction and Popular Exaggeration of New Media Language in the Print Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 667–701.Google Scholar
Aull, B. (2019). A Study of Phatic Emoji Use in WhatsApp Communication. Internet Pragmatics, 2(2), 206–32.Google Scholar
Carr, N. (2008) Is Google Making us Stupid? The Atlantic, August 15.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2010). The Changing Nature of Text, in Text Comparison and Digital Creativity: The Production of Presence and Meaning in Digital Text Scholarship, eds. van Peursen, W. T., Thoutenhoofd, E., and van der Weel, A., 229–51. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
DeKay, S. H. (2012). Interpersonal Communication in the Workplace: A Largely Unexplored Region. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 449–52.Google Scholar
Gray, B. (2010). On the use of Demonstrative Pronouns and Determiners as Cohesive Devices: A Focus on Sentence-initial This/these in Academic Prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 167–83.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C. (2013). Relevance in Computer-mediated Conversation, in Handbook of Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication, eds. Herring, S. C, Stein, D and Virtanen, T, 245–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruter.Google Scholar
Hougaard, T. T. and Rathje, M. (2018). Emojis in the Digital Writings of Young Danes, in Jugendsprachen/Youth Languages: Aktuelle Perspektiven internationaler Forschung/Current Perspectives of International Research, ed. Ziegler, A, 773–806. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huang, C. et al. (2020). Clinical Features of Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet, 395(10223), 497–506.Google Scholar
Kuznekoff, J. H., Munz, S., and Titsworth, S. (2015). Mobile Phones in the Classroom: Examining the Effects of Texting, Twitter, and Message Content on Student Learning. Communication Education, 64(3), 344–65.Google Scholar
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Mønsted, B. M, Hövel, P, and Lehmann, S (2019). Accelerating Dynamics of Collective Attention. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1759.Google Scholar
May, K. E. and Elder, A. D. (2018). Efficient, Helpful, or Distracting? A Literature Review of Media Multitasking in Relation to Academic Performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. (2016). The Linguistic Evolution of “Like,” The Atlantic, November 25.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. (2020). Before Zuckerberg, Gutenberg. The Atlantic, 325(1), 22–4.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2015). The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s Guide to Writing in the 21st Century. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Shepherd, R. P. (2018). Digital Writing, Multimodality, and Learning Transfer: Crafting Connections between Composition and Online Composing. Computers and Composition, 48, 103–14.Google Scholar
Steinbrich, P. (2014). Perceptual Salience of Academic Formulas in Academic Writing, in Language Skills: Traditions, Transitions and Ways Forward, eds. Chodkiewicz, H. and Trepczyńska, M., 343–365. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sutherland, K., Davis, C, Terton, U, and Visser, I (2018). University Student Social Media Use and its Influence on Offline Engagement in Higher Educational Communities. Student Success, 9 (2), 13–24.Google Scholar
Sword, H. (2012). Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tagg, C. (2013). Scraping the Barrel with a Shower of Social Misfits: Everyday Creativity in Text Messaging. Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 480–500.Google Scholar
Thurairaj, S., Hoon, E. P, Roy, S. S, and Fong, P. K (2015). Reflections of Students’ Language Usage in Social Networking Sites: Making or Marring Academic English. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 13(4), 301–15.Google Scholar
Vanderplank, R. (2010). Déjà Vu? A Decade of Research on Language Laboratories, Television and Video in Language Learning. Language Teaching, 43(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
Whitman, W. (1885). Slang in America. The North American Review, 141(348), 431–5.Google Scholar
Baker-Bell, A. (2020). Linguistic Justice: Black Language, Literacy, Identity, and Pedagogy. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crosthwaite, P. and Jiang, K. (2017). Does EAP Affect Written L2 Academic Stance? A Longitudinal Learner Corpus Study. System, 69, 92–107.Google Scholar
Perryman-Clark, S. M. (2013). African American Language, Rhetoric, and students’ Writing: New Directions for SRTOL. College Composition and Communication, 64(3), 469–95.Google Scholar
Reiff, M.J. and Bawarshi, A. (2011). Tracing Discursive Resources: How Students Use Prior Genre Knowledge to Negotiate New Writing Contexts in First-Year Composition. Written Communication, 28(3), 312–37.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (2022). Cultivating Critical Language Awareness in the Writing Classroom. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. Google Scholar
Storch, N. and Tapper, J., (2009). The Impact of an EAP Course on Postgraduate Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3), 207–23.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Laura Aull, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: You Can't Write That
  • Online publication: 09 November 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Laura Aull, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: You Can't Write That
  • Online publication: 09 November 2023
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Laura Aull, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: You Can't Write That
  • Online publication: 09 November 2023
Available formats
×