Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:35:49.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telemedicine for Patient Management in Remote Areas and Underserved Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2022

Niloofar Mohammadzadeh ,
Sorayya Rezayi  and
Soheila Saeedi Open the ORCID record for Soheila Saeedi [Opens in a new window]
Niloofar Mohammadzadeh
Affiliation:
Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Sorayya Rezayi
Affiliation:
Medical Informatics, Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Soheila Saeedi*
Affiliation:
Medical Informatics, Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Soheila Saeedi, Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Access to care services in remote areas is challenging. The use of telemedicine technology in these areas facilitates access to health care. This study aimed to summarize the current research on telemedicine in remote areas such as mountains and forests. A systematic search was conducted in databases including Medline (through PubMed), Scopus, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, and ISI Web of Science to identify relevant studies published until May 12, 2021. Screening of retrieved articles for selection and inclusion in the study was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. A total of 807 articles were identified after removing duplicates, from which 20 studies meeting our inclusion criteria were selected. Challenges, opportunities, and equipment required to use telemedicine in remote areas were extracted from the selected studies. The results revealed that telemedicine implementation in remote areas had many challenges, including harsh weather conditions, Internet connectivity problems, difficult equipment transportation, and ethical issues. Telemedicine also has many benefits, such as cost and time savings for patients, improving patients’ quality of life, and improving patient satisfaction. Telemedicine for inhabitants of forested and mountainous areas facilitates rapid access to health care and enhances patient satisfaction. Distinguishing advantages and barriers as well as reducing restrictions will have an essential role in accelerating the use of this technology.

Keywords

telemedicinemountainforestaltitudechallengesopportunities
Type
Systematic Review
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 17 , 2023 , e167
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

In developing countries, health-care services are not available to people living in remote areas. Physicians also live mainly in urban areas and do not desire to live in remote areas with fewer amenities. In geographically isolated areas, the situation is far more complicated, and it is challenging to provide health services to people living in these areas. People living in such areas may not receive the services they need, leading to social disparity and injustice in accessing health services. Reference Rey-Moreno, Bebea-Gonzalez and Foche-Perez1 In mountainous areas with complex orography, access to different places is difficult, increasing the time of patient transfer to the hospital. Reference Brunetti, Dell’Anno and Martone2,Reference Chen, Wong and Chen3

Today, the application of technology in health care has led to improved care delivery. Digital interventions and evolution in communication have significantly changed the way the services are delivered. Thus, telemedicine has become part of health care. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines telemedicine as the provision of remote health-care services by information and communication technologies (ICTs) to provide information on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases, research, and education of health-care providers to promote the health of individuals and communities. Reference Almathami, Win and Vlahu-Gjorgievska4

Mountains cover 24% of the earth’s surface, and a large percentage of the world’s population lives in these areas. 5 The Himalayas is one of the most well-known mountain ranges stretching over India, Pakistan, China, Nepal, and Bhutan, with around 52.7 million people living in this region. 5 Forests cover approximately 30% of the earth’s surface. Reference Carlowicz6 Thus, because many people dwell in these areas, by means of telemedicine, the desired medical services can be provided to the residents of these areas, which can reduce the need to travel for these people. Telemedicine can save time and money by reducing the number of travels. Reference Scott Kruse, Karem and Shifflett7

People who live in remote areas, such as mountains and forests, or people who do not live in these areas but are present as tourists can benefit from health-care services through telemedicine. Telemedicine, with its facilities, is a practical and low-cost solution for high altitude and expedition medicine. Reference Martinelli, Moroni and Bastiani8

In addition to the mentioned reasons for needing telemedicine, mountainous and forested areas have always faced natural and man-made disasters, such as train accidents in mountainous areas, mountain falls, avalanches, landslides, floods, mudslides, debris, and forest fire. Reference Mishra, Ghate and Maharjan9–Reference Melis and Hilhorst11 They cause massive injuries and losses every year. In these cases, immediate disaster response is required, where the lack of facilities related to providing health services in these remote areas is more serious. Providing health services in disasters is one of the essential applications of telemedicine. In the event of a disaster, local health facilities can be severely damaged, local hospitals and clinics may be damaged or inaccessible, in which case various telemedicine services may be available. Reference Litvak, Miller and Boyle12

The use of telemedicine in remote areas is faced with advantages and challenges, requiring special equipment. This field demands a comprehensive study to examine the challenges, opportunities, and equipment required for telemedicine in these regions, guiding policy-makers and organizations that intend to implement telemedicine for peoples living in mountainous and forested areas. Thus, the purpose of this review is to comprehensively examine the studies conducted on the use of telemedicine in the mountains and forests, and to answer the following questions:

RQ1: What are the opportunities of telemedicine in forested and mountainous areas?

RQ2: What are the challenges of telemedicine in forested and mountainous areas?

RQ3: What equipment do we need to use telemedicine in these areas?

Methods

The present study was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.

A comprehensive search was conducted on May 12, 2021, in the Medline (through PubMed), Scopus, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, and ISI Web of Science databases to answer the mentioned questions. A combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords related to telemedicine (eg, telehealth, mHealth, mobile health, remote consultation, teleconference, telecare), mountain (eg, mountaineering, altitude), and forest (eg, jungle) were used in the search strategy (Table 1).

Table 1. Search strategy for each database

The results of the search conducted in these 4 databases were entered into the EndNote library and duplicates were removed, so that from the 1062 articles identified, 807 articles remained after removing the duplicates (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the literature search and study selection.

Titles and abstracts of the articles were reviewed by 2 reviewers independently. After removing irrelevant items and considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 35 articles remained for full-text review. The full-text of selected articles was reviewed and required information was extracted by 2 researchers (S.S. and S.R.). Also, any disagreement between the authors in selecting eligible studies was resolved through consultation with N.M. No time limits were imposed, and articles that had examined the challenges, benefits, and equipment used to provide telemedicine services in forests and mountains were included in the final review. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the articles are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for selecting articles.

Results

After reviewing the full text of selected articles, 20 articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which 3 were related to the use of telemedicine in the forest, and 17 dealt with the use of telemedicine in the mountains. After reviewing these articles, the opportunities, challenges, equipment, and services provided by telemedicine in these areas were extracted from the articles.

Forest Reference Rey-Moreno, Bebea-Gonzalez and Foche-Perez1,Reference Miscione13,Reference Latifi, Stanonik Mde and Merrell14

Of the studied articles, 3 were related to telemedicine in forested areas. The opportunities, challenges, and equipment required for implementing telemedicine in forests were examined in these articles.

Opportunities

The use of telemedicine in forested areas facilitates inhabitants’ access to health care, diminishes the need to travel long distances to hospitals, reduces the number of travels, and plays an essential role in reducing costs.

Challenges

This study indicated that telemedicine and telehealth services in forested areas have many advantages, but their implementation is faced with many challenges and barriers. Groups that want to implement telemedicine in these regions should pay attention to these issues and consider appropriate solutions.

Challenges for telemedicine in the forested areas include: (1) poor communication in forested areas due to high trees, (2) dependence of communication on the atmospheric condition, (3) energy supply, (4) connection increment and attenuation due to heavy rains, (5) frequent storms, (6) vulnerability of electronic equipment against the rain and moisture, (7) network instability, (8) cost of maintenance and training of technicians and health-care workers, (9) the need for a large number of resources, people, and time to prepare telemedicine, (10) allocation of a suitable place for the installation of telemedicine equipment, (11) difficult transportation of equipment by small aircraft due to the high weight of the equipment, and (12) the need for a local guide for passing through difficult and dangerous terrains.

Equipment

Large numbers of equipment were needed to implement and use telemedicine in forested areas, which can be classified into 2 main categories; (1) general equipment such as telemedicine hardware and software and (2) special equipment needed for the implementation of telemedicine in forested areas that may not be used in other areas. The required equipment for the implementation of telemedicine is listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Equipment needed to implement telemedicine in the forest

Mountain

Seventeen articles were related to the use of telemedicine in mountainous areas. They have mentioned issues such as telemedicine users, the use of telemedicine to manage specific diseases, telemedicine services, and opportunities, challenges, and equipment required for telemedicine.

Telemedicine Users and Diseases

Telemedicine users in the mountainous area and the use of telemedicine for most common diseases are presented in Figure 3. Reference Martinelli, Moroni and Bastiani8,Reference Otto, Hamilton and Levine15–Reference Satava, Angood and Harnett21

Figure 3. Telemedicine users and diseases that telemedicine is used to manage.

Service Provided Reference Brunetti, Dell’Anno and Martone2,Reference Martinelli, Moroni and Bastiani8,Reference Otto, Hamilton and Levine15,Reference Satava, Angood and Harnett21–Reference McBeth, Hamilton and Kirkpatrick26

Telemedicine technology has been used in mountainous areas to provide many services to patients, as shown in Figure 4. These services are essential and can save patients’ lives.

Figure 4. Telemedicine services provided for patients.

Opportunities Reference Brunetti, Dell’Anno and Martone2,Reference Martinelli, Moroni and Bastiani8,Reference White and Angood16,Reference Ganapathy, Alagappan and Rajakumar24,Reference Otto27

The results of studies revealed that the use of telemedicine in mountainous areas has many benefits and opportunities, which are listed as follows: saving costs, avoiding inappropriate rescue interventions, reducing the distance between patients and health-care centers, facilitating patient follow-up, saving time for patients, shortening treatment time, improving patients’ quality of life, reducing patient travel to seek medical consultation, improving the attractiveness of mountainous areas for tourists, providing real-time consultation with physicians, avoiding admission to emergency and specialized departments, mitigating traffic and pollution, reducing the waiting time, monitoring multiple pathologies, providing teleconsultation even from the doctors’ home, reducing car traffic and carbon footprint, mitigating physical and emotional stress of users, improving patient satisfaction and happiness, providing opportunities for monitoring parameters that should be checked daily, and providing emergency services.

Challenges Reference Otto, Hamilton and Levine15,Reference Ganapathy, Chawdhry and Premanand19,Reference Satava, Angood and Harnett21,Reference Kreshak23,Reference Ganapathy, Alagappan and Rajakumar24,Reference Otto and Remote28

Implementing and using telemedicine in mountainous areas has many challenges that can be divided into 2 categories of general challenges and ethical issues Reference Szawarski and Hillebrandt29 :

General Challenges

  • Reimbursement policies and licensing barriers.

  • Device’s failures in the cold and hypobaric conditions of extreme altitudes.

  • Snowstorms may damage camps and health-care centers.

  • Lack of continuous and reliable power supply.

  • Costs related to equipment and implementation of telemedicine.

  • Lack of necessary facilities for some diagnostic tests.

  • Impossibility of sophisticated investigation for patients.

  • Nonfamiliarity with software, hardware, and reluctance to use tools by health-care providers.

  • Internet connectivity problems.

  • Use of local dialect by patients.

  • Lack of awareness and transport, and harsh weather conditions.

  • Melting snow and landslides.

  • Bandwidth issues.

  • Local staff who perceived telehealth as a threat.

  • Poor health-seeking behavior.

  • Lack of definite regulations regarding the implementation of telemedicine in mountainous areas.

  • Lack of support from the Ministry of Health for plans related to the implementation of telemedicine.

  • Provision of convincing conditions for physicians to live in mountainous areas.

Ethical Issues

  • According to USA federal legislation known as the “Ryan Haight Act,” which is related to the prescription of controlled drugs over the Internet, the prescription and distribution of drugs over the Internet without a valid prescription are not possible. According to this law, a prescription is valid if the practitioner has at least 1 in-person examination of the patient. Thus, it is impossible to prescribe medication for some patients in telemedicine.

  • Obtaining patient consent for examination through telemedicine is 1 of the issues that should be considered.

  • Confidentiality of information and management of legal aspects, and data security are also important issues that should be considered before implementing telemedicine.

  • Most of the time, climbers ascend mountains in groups. In the event of an accident for a climber in the group, the medical team must provide medical information to the patient in the presence of group members, and in such cases, the confidentiality of patients’ information is endangered.

  • The patient’s medical record and clinical information should be kept secure to facilitate the provision of clinical care as well as subsequent reviews and claims in the event of medical malpractice. Thus, due to the unfavorable weather conditions in the mountainous areas, necessary measures should be considered.

Equipment

Studies have revealed that the use of telemedicine in mountainous areas requires a considerable amount of equipment. Reference Martinelli, Moroni and Bastiani8,Reference Otto, Hamilton and Levine15,Reference Angood, Satava and Doarn17–Reference Ganapathy, Chawdhry and Premanand19,Reference Satava, Angood and Harnett21,Reference Singh, Kapoor and Basnet22,Reference Ganapathy, Alagappan and Rajakumar24–Reference McBeth, Hamilton and Kirkpatrick26,Reference Otto and Remote28,Reference Szawarski and Hillebrandt29 Such equipment can be divided into 3 categories: (1) medical equipment, (2) software and hardware related to the implementation of telemedicine, and (3) special equipment that is used in mountainous areas and may not be applied in other areas. The list of equipment needed in mountainous areas is provided in Table 3.

Table 3. Equipment needed to implement telemedicine in mountains

Costs of Telemedicine in Forests and Mountains

The costs related to the implementation of telemedicine in the mountains and forests include establishing telemedicine, maintenance, and training technicians and health-care workers. In telemedicine in forests, the cost of installing towers, sometimes more than 90 meters, is usually high. Transporting equipment by the river also augments the costs drastically. Reference Rey-Moreno, Bebea-Gonzalez and Foche-Perez1 However, in mountains, its use has led to direct and indirect savings by leaving helicopters, ambulances, structures, and personnel free where needed, reducing traffic and pollution. Reference Martinelli, Moroni and Bastiani8 Telemedicine in the mountains can also save considerable effort, time, physical discomfort, and emotional stress. Reference Martinelli, Moroni and Bastiani8,Reference Ganapathy, Alagappan and Rajakumar24

Discussion

In this study, the use of telemedicine in mountainous and forested areas was reviewed. In this review, the equipment, opportunities, and challenges of this technology were studied. Services provided by means of this technology in mountainous areas included prehospital triage, ECG transmission, teleconsultations, telelaboratory, telementoring, teleemergency services, teleradiology, and teleultrasound. In a systematic review by Ting and Wilkes examining the application of telemedicine in remote and austere environments, the most common services of telemedicine included telemonitoring, teleultrasound, teleradiology, ECG, and telementoring where an expert guides health-care providers on how to diagnose and treat patients. Reference Ting and Wilkes30 Telemedicine is a perfect solution for managing acute conditions in mountainous areas as well as controlling hypotension and trauma. Reference Martinelli, Moroni and Bastiani8

Implementing telemedicine in mountainous areas can have many benefits, the most important of which is access to health-care services in an emergency condition. Harsh weather conditions and difficult transportation in mountains are some of the reasons that hinder access to medical services for residents of mountainous regions. By implementing telemedicine in these areas, health-care providers can overcome these difficult conditions and provide health-care services to patients when needed. Reference Ganapathy, Alagappan and Rajakumar24

From an economic point of view, use of telemedicine in these areas will have several benefits. From the patients’ perspective, telemedicine services allow patients to gain access to medical services without traveling long distances, spending money, or absence from work. Patients can also have access to medical services at any time. From the health-care providers’ point of view, telemedicine leads to a reduction in referrals to specialized centers and lowers the number of referrals, which consequently mitigates the workload of health-care providers. It can also be cost-effective in the long-term.

Some of the significant challenges mentioned regarding telemedicine in mountainous and forested areas included harsh weather conditions, difficult transportation, and lack of access to these areas. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) or drones can help solve these problems. Reference Bhatt, Pourmand and Sikka31 This tool in telemedicine can have different applications. UAVs can enhance access to health-care services. Through this tool, the required tools and equipment can be transferred to remote areas. In various studies, the delivery of automated external defibrillators (AEDs), medical specimens, and vaccines were mentioned as UAVs’ advantages. Reference Boutilier, Brooks and Janmohamed32–Reference Haidari, Brown and Ferguson34 This tool can also be used as a communication hotspot; an example of this technology is its application in telesurgery. Reference Harnett, Doarn and Rosen35 With UAVs’ assistance, it will be possible to provide specialized services to the residents of inaccessible areas and reduce transportation costs. Reference Amukele36

Conclusions

This study revealed that telemedicine in forested and mountainous areas provides many opportunities for its users, facilitates easy access to health care for the residents of these areas, decreases costs, and increases patients’ quality of life. Nevertheless, the implementation of telemedicine in these areas faces many challenges, the most important of which are difficult access to these areas and poor weather conditions, making telemedicine application challenging in these areas. Heavy rain and snow in these areas also make it very difficult to protect telemedicine equipment as well as to communicate and supply energy.

Author Contributions

S.S., S.R., and N.M. designed the review, search strategy, and conducted database searches. S.R. and S.S. conducted article screenings under N.M. supervision. S.S. carried out the analysis and interpretation under N.M. supervision. Finally, S.S. and S.R. drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the content and approved it.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Rey-Moreno, C, Bebea-Gonzalez, I, Foche-Perez, I, et al. A telemedicine WiFi network optimized for long distances in the Amazonian jungle of Peru. Proceedings of the 3rd Extreme Conference on Communication: The Amazon Expedition; September 26, 2011; Manaus, Brazil: Association for Computing Machinery. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2414393.2414402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, ND, Dell’Anno, A, Martone, A, et al. Prehospital ECG transmission results in shorter door-to-wire time for STEMI patients in a remote mountainous region. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(2):252-257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C-H, Wong, T-Y, Chen, H-C, et al. Telemedicine communication using instant messaging technology improves pre-hospital triage in high mountain train disasters. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2020. doi: 10.1177/1024907920966530 Google Scholar
Almathami, HKY, Win, KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E. Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine-based, real-time, online consultation at patients’ homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(2):e16407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WorldAtlas. How much of the world’s land mass is mountainous? July 10, 2021. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/how-much-of-the-world-s-land-mass-is-mountainous.html Google Scholar
Carlowicz, M. Seeing forests for the trees and the carbon: mapping the world’s forests in three dimensions: feature articles. 2012. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Seeing-Forests-for-the-Trees-and-the-Carbon%3A-the-in-Carlowicz/def3af403a257b768fa1e8960cf648d14028bbfe Google Scholar
Scott Kruse, C, Karem, P, Shifflett, K, et al. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):4-12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinelli, M, Moroni, D, Bastiani, L, et al. High-altitude mountain telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;28(2):135-145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishra, A, Ghate, R, Maharjan, A, et al. Building ex ante resilience of disaster-exposed mountain communities: drawing insights from the Nepal earthquake recovery. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017;22:167-178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, L, Lin, L, Liu, S, et al. Interaction between risk perception and sense of place in disaster-prone mountain areas: a case study in China’s Three Gorges Reservoir area. Nat Hazard. 2017;85(2):777-792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melis, S, Hilhorst, D. When the mountain broke: disaster governance in Sierra Leone. Disaster Prev Manag. 2020;30(6):14-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litvak, M, Miller, K, Boyle, T, et al. Telemedicine use in disasters: a scoping review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021:1-10.Google ScholarPubMed
Miscione, G. Telemedicine in the Upper Amazon: interplay with local health care practices. MIS Q. 2007;31(2):403-425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latifi, R, Stanonik Mde, L, Merrell, RC, et al. Telemedicine in extreme conditions: supporting the Martin Strel Amazon swim expedition. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(1):93-100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otto, C, Hamilton, DR, Levine, BD, et al. Into thin air: extreme ultrasound on Mt Everest. Wilderness Environ Med. 2009;20(3):283-289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, AP, Angood, P. Advancing technologies in clinical medicine: the Yale-Mount Everest telemedicine project. Yale J Biol Med. 1999;72(1):19-27.Google ScholarPubMed
Angood, PB, Satava, R, Doarn, C, et al. Telemedicine at the top of the world: the 1998 and 1999 Everest Extreme Expeditions. Telemed J E Health. 2000;6(3):315-325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, M, Yuying, Y, Miura, Y, et al. Telemedicine for mountain climbers with high quality video and stethoscope sound transmission. IEEE EMBS Asian-Pacific Conference on Biomedical Engineering, 2003. October 20-22, 2003. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1302592 Google Scholar
Ganapathy, K, Chawdhry, V, Premanand, S, et al. Telemedicine in the Himalayas: operational challenges—a preliminary report. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(10):821-835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachdev, K, Bansal, V, Kumar, V, et al. Himalayan tourism and telemedicine. HEALTHCOM 2006: Mobile E-Health for Developing Countries - 2006 8th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services; August 17-19, 2006. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1717844 Google Scholar
Satava, R, Angood, PB, Harnett, B, et al. The physiologic cipher at altitude: Telemedicine and real-time monitoring of climbers on Mount Everest. Telemed J E Health. 2000;6(3):303-313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, K, Kapoor, L, Basnet, R, et al. Design and implementation of telemedicine network in a sub Himalayan state of India. HEALTHCOM 2006: Mobile E-Health for Developing Countries - 2006 8th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services; August 17-19, 2006. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1717821 Google Scholar
Kreshak, J. Technical and cultural challenges of remote health care on Everest. Yale J Biol Med. 1999;72(1):29-31.Google ScholarPubMed
Ganapathy, K, Alagappan, D, Rajakumar, H, et al. Tele-emergency services in the Himalayas. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(5):380-390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kao, WF, Huang, JH, Kuo, TBJ, et al. Real-time electrocardiogram transmission from Mount Everest during continued ascent. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBeth, PB, Hamilton, T, Kirkpatrick, AW. Cost-effective remote iPhone-teathered telementored trauma telesonography. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2010;69(6):1597-1599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otto, CA. Telemedicine in the Canadian high arctic and other remote environments. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings; October 13–16, 1999. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/803864 Google Scholar
Otto, C, Remote, Pipe A., mobile telemedicine: the satellite transmission of medical data from Mount Logan. J Telemed Telecare. 1997;3(Suppl 1):84-85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szawarski, P, Hillebrandt, D. Doctor won’t see you now: changing paradigms in mountain medicine. Postgrad Med J. 2018;94(1109):182-184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, L, Wilkes, M. Telemedicine for patient management on expeditions in remote and austere environments: a systematic review. Wilderness Environ Med. 2021;32(1):102-111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatt, K, Pourmand, A, Sikka, N. Targeted applications of unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) in telemedicine. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(11):833-838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boutilier, JJ, Brooks, SC, Janmohamed, A, et al. Optimizing a drone network to deliver automated external defibrillators. Circulation. 2017;135(25):2454-2465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amukele, TK, Sokoll, LJ, Pepper, D, et al. Can unmanned aerial systems (drones) be used for the routine transport of chemistry, hematology, and coagulation laboratory specimens? PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0134020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidari, LA, Brown, ST, Ferguson, M, et al. The economic and operational value of using drones to transport vaccines. Vaccine. 2016;34(34):4062-4067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harnett, BM, Doarn, CR, Rosen, J, et al. Evaluation of unmanned airborne vehicles and mobile robotic telesurgery in an extreme environment. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(6):539-544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amukele, T. Current state of drones in healthcare: challenges and opportunities. J Appl Lab Med. 2019;4(2):296-298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Search strategy for each database

Figure 1

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the literature search and study selection.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for selecting articles.

Figure 3

Table 2. Equipment needed to implement telemedicine in the forest

Figure 4

Figure 3. Telemedicine users and diseases that telemedicine is used to manage.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Telemedicine services provided for patients.

Figure 6

Table 3. Equipment needed to implement telemedicine in mountains