Non-communicable diseases are responsible for more than 80 % of all deaths(1), with CVD being the leading cause of death in almost all countries. Over half of deaths from CVD in the Latin American Region are attributable to high blood pressure, with 20–35 % of adults having hypertension(2). There is clear evidence that excessive consumption of salt/Na adversely affects blood pressure, which alone accounts for an estimated 10·8 million deaths in 2019(3).
A recent systematic review around the world has identified a significant inverse correlation between discretionary salt intake and a country’s per capita gross domestic product (P < 0·0001)(Reference Bhat, Marklund and Henry4). In this study, food groups, such as bread and bakery products, cereals and grains, meat products, and dairy products, were found to be significant contributors to daily Na intake across multiple countries and continents.
Na reduction policies are cost effective in reducing the global burden of CVD(Reference Hope, Webster and Trieu5–8). Research about economic evaluations of individual- and population-based interventions for primary and secondary prevention of CVD among adults in low- and middle-income countries has found that those targeting reduction in salt intake are very cost effective in these countries, with potential to generate economic gains that can be reinvested to improve health and/or other sectors(Reference Aminde, Takah and Zapata-Diomedi9). Asaria et al. (Reference Asaria, Chisholm and Mathers10) assessed the financial costs and health effects of a voluntary reduction in the salt content of processed foods by manufacturers plus a mass media campaign to encourage dietary change in twenty-three selected low- and middle-income countries, including Argentina. They estimated that a 15 % reduction in dietary salt intake in Argentina would save 60 000 lives over the period 2006–2015 at a cost of USA$ 0·14 per capita (equivalent to AR$ 16·7 million for a population of Argentina (38 million in 2005). It is, therefore, considered a priority action for non-communicable disease prevention(Reference Beaglehole, Bonita and Horton11). Currently, the salt/Na consumption in the Latin America Region and in Argentina is almost double the recommendation from the WHO(Reference Santos, Tekle and Rosewarne12). While WHO recommends a population-based daily intake of < 5 g of salt (< 2 g of Na) per day/per adult(13), in Latin America, the combined average estimated daily salt intake from studies with urine samples collected after 24 h was 9·7 g/d(Reference Carrillo-Larco and Bernabe-Ortiz14). In Argentina, objective measurements conducted as part of the 2018 National Risk Factor Survey indicated that hypertension affects 40·6 % of the adult population in the country(15). In terms of salt intake, it was estimated at 7·9 g/d using spot urine samples, and 91·8 % of individuals aged 18 years and older consumed 5 g of salt or more per day in Argentina, and therefore do not meet WHO recommendations(16).
Research conducted in Argentina has already established the feasibility of Na reduction in processed foods in the country(Reference Ferrante, Apro and Ferreira17). A reduction of 3 g of salt in the Argentinean diet has been estimated to decrease the prevalence of CVD by over 20 %, also contributing to reduced mortality rates from heart disease by 19·9 %(Reference Konfino, Mekonnen and Coxson18).
Argentina was the first country in Latin America to introduce a national legislation (Act 26 905) limiting salt levels across a broad range of food groups (meat and meat products; farinaceous; and soups, dressing and canned soups) and other two main measures including education campaigns for the general population and a restaurant strategy (low-Na menus and restriction of saltshakers). The law entered into force in December 2014, a year after its enactment, allowing food companies up to 12 months to achieve full compliance(19).
In 2019, Argentina issued three new resolutions (1/2018(20), 4/2019(21) and 33/2019(22)) to update stringent Na targets in food categories such as farinaceous; meat products and soups and bouillons and to include new Na targets for dressings such as mayonnaise, tomato-based dressing and sauces. In both cases, companies will have 18 months to achieve full compliance.
Regarding the nutritional labelling information provided to the consumer, in Argentina, it is regulated by the Argentine Food Code. This code establishes that information about the quantitative content of Na (mg/portion size) is mandatory on the nutritional information panel on the products(23). The same code also sets the analytical methodology for calculating this critical nutrient(23).
Furthermore, in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region, voluntary regional targets for sodium content were set in 2015 for eleven food categories by the Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) Technical Advisory Group for Sodium, based on established national targets in the LAC region and endorsed by the Salt Smart Consortium, a group of government and non-governmental organisations and food companies. LAC countries were expected to have met these targets by December 2016(24). In 2021, PAHO updated its Regional Sodium Reduction Targets and established revised targets for 2022 and 2025 for sxiteen food categories and seventy-five subcategories(2).
Previous studies comparing the Na levels of processed foods in Argentina during 2014 and 2018 showed high levels of compliance with the National Law but relevant challenges in specific food categories and with the regional targets(Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Ponce25,Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Guarnieri26) . For example, in the last analysis, almost 50 % of products contained Na levels above the 2015 PAHO lower targets(Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Guarnieri26). Therefore, in order to know the progress in the implementation of the national sodium policy in Argentina and to compare Na levels in relation to the regional limits recommended by PAHO for Na in foods(2), the objectives of this study were (a) to assess the current Na levels in a variety of processed food groups and categories available in the Argentinean market; (b) to monitor compliance with the maximum levels set forth by Act 26 905 and the most recent amendments and (c) to compare the current Na content levels with the updated regional targets. In this study, we measured progress in implementing the national sodium policy in Argentina and also analyzed Na levels relative to the PAHO regional recommended limits for salt/Na in foods.
Materials and methods
This was a cross-sectional, systematic survey of pre-packaged food products available in the Argentinian food supply assessing sodium content as reported in nutrition information panels. Sodium levels were compared against the maximum values set in Act 26 905 and in the updated PAHO regional targets. This study was part of the collaborative regional study that included Argentina, Peru, Panama and Costa Rica. The purpose was to compare the Na content of foods among these countries, aiming to understand the extent to which regional targets are being met in each case.
Data collection
Data were collected during March 2022 in Buenos Aires city in two of the main supermarket chains (JUMBO and Chango Más). The selected stores are among the six leading retailers in Argentina, which altogether represent 80 % of the grocery retail market(27).
Data collection was conducted by members of the research team on-site, with written store management approval. Each product was surveyed using the Food Label Information and Price for Latin American and Caribbean countries smartphone data collector app and web-based software developed by the University of Toronto (U of T)(Reference Ahmed, Schermel and Lee28). Food Label Information and Price for Latin American and Caribbean is a food composition database software (web and mobile) that provides a shorter and more efficient food collection and data processing approach. Data collection consisted of scanning the bar code of each product and taking photographs of all sides including all products on the shelf, which can encompass both products similar to those included in the previous analysis(Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Ponce25,Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Guarnieri26) and new products available on the market. This information was then uploaded to the FLIP database for processing and analyses. For each product, the manufacturer, brand and product names, serving size, container size, ingredients and complete nutritional information (where applicable) of the product as sold and as consumed (serving/g or ml) were entered. Data collectors walked along and observed all the aisles and product displays in each store to ensure that all products available for purchase and belonging to the food categories of interest were recorded. Food products sold at more than one retailer were captured only once. Quality assurance measures were implemented to detect duplicate products and ensure accuracy of data entry (e.g. rank ordering data to identify outliers, calculation of Atwater factors) and food category classification.
Food product categorisation
Food groups were defined to include products manufactured from the same raw material and with similar nutritional content (e.g. bread and bakery products and dairy products). Food categories included products with the same manufacturing process (e.g. biscuits and bread, within the bread and bakery products groups)(Reference Allemandi, Garipe and Schoj29). The final food categorisation system included nineteen food groups: bread and bakery products; cereals and cereal products; convenience foods; dairy; edible oils and oil emulsions; fish and derivatives; meat and meat products; snacks and appetizsers; sauces and spreads; non-alcoholic beverages; canned fruit and vegetables; chocolates; ice cream; condiments, candies; jam; artificial sweeteners; peanut or legume butters and spreads and foods for infants and young children (Fig. 1).
Data analysis
For the comparison of the surveyed products against the current Na content targets established by Act 26 905,(19) we matched food groups and categories from our database with the food groups and categories included in the law: farinaceous foods; meat and meat products and soups, bouillons and dressings (Fig. 1). These groups were also classified in thirty-three categories. Additionally, food products were classified based on the updated regional targets, where foods are grouped into sixteen major categories and seventy-five subcategories defined by the PAHO(2). In order to be consistent with food categorisation across countries, as part of the collaborative regional study, food categorisation was validated by the U of T research team, and minor discrepancies were resolved (Fig. 1). Data were analysed and compared against the different Na targets established in the Updated PAHO Regional Sodium Reduction Targets based on mg/100 g for 2022 and 2025(2).
Statistical analyses
The Na content in foods was obtained from the nutrition facts table (mg/serving) and was converted to standardised units (mg/100 g) considering the products as consumed. Median values were used to characterise the distribution of the data set in each food group and category. The mean and the range are included as a reference; the percentage coefficient of variation (C.V. %) is provided as an alternative index of dispersion. The median Na content of products belonging to food groups/categories considered in the National Law was compared with the Na targets established by the law and the updated regional targets. We present the percentage of products in each category that exceed the Na thresholds in each system. All data analyses were conducted using Python.
Results
Sodium content by Argentinean food categories
The total sample (n 3997) was mainly composed of the following five categories: bread and bakery products (n 691, 17·3 %), dairy products (n 560, 14·0 %), cereal and cereal products (n 443, 11·1 %), convenience foods (n 440, 11·0 %) and non-alcoholic beverages (n 360, 9·0 %).
The five categories with the highest median Na content were meat and fish condiments (median: 13 500 mg/100 g), appetisers (median: 1900 mg/100 g), luncheon meat and sausages (median: 921·21 mg/100 g), dressings (median: 777·5 mg/100 g) and leavening flour (median: 757 mg/100 g) (Table 1).
Na content was very variable among products belonging to the same category. Maximum variability was reported for artificial sweeteners in powder or tablet (range: 0–1250·7 mg/100 g, CV: 529·2 %), jam (range: 0–250 mg/100 g. CV: 270·5 %), other condiments (range 0–11 666·7 mg/100 g. CV: 199·1 %), other fish products (range: 0–5913·3 mg/100 g. CV: 193 %) and bouillon cubes and powders (range: 24–24 000 mg/100 g. CV: 189·9 %) (Table 1).
The categories with the highest maximum Na values are bouillon cubes and powders (24 000 mg/100 g), meat and fish condiments (17 120 mg/100 g), other condiments (11 666·7 mg/100 g), dressings (8060 mg/100 g), other fish (5913·3 mg/100 g), luncheon meat and sausages (5460 mg/100 g), cheese (3300 mg/100 g), puff pastry for empanadas (2901·8 mg/100 g), appetisers (2885 mg/100 g) and bread (2110 mg/100 g) (Table 1).
Comparison of Sodium Content against the Maximum Levels Set by National Act 26 905
There were 760 products in our database (n 3997) that were included in the food groups and categories regulated by Act 26 905. Most of them belong to the farinaceous food group (n 518), followed by meat and meat products (n 135) and soups, bouillons and dressings (n 107). Although the observed median values were below the Na targets in all product categories, eighteen of the thirty-three categories considered in this analysis included one or more specific products whose Na levels were above the category target. Of the 760 products analysed, 6·3 % (n 48) were found to exceed the Na content targets set by law (Table 2).
* Categories highlighted in bold indicate those products that exceed the national maximum targets set by the law.
Non-compliances with the law were found in all food groups: soups, bouillons and dressings (11·2 %), meat and meat products (6·7 %) and farinaceous products (5·21 %). Within soups, bouillons and dressings, the categories mayonnaise (22·2 %), ketchup (15·4 %), clear soup (15·4 %), instant soup (10 %) and ready-made sauces in sachet (7·1 %) were found to be in non-compliance with the law. Among meat and meat products, only luncheon meat and cooked sausages were found to be in non-compliance with the law (16·1 % and 11·1 % in non-compliance respectively). Finally, regarding farinaceous group, the categories with most of the non-compliant products were wholemeal bread (20·7 %), white bread (17·6 %), hot dog buns (16·7 %), hamburger buns (15·8 %) and cheese puffs (9·1 %) (Table 2).
Comparison of current sodium levels in Argentina with regional sodium targets
This analysis was performed on 1449 of the total 3997 surveyed products from eight categories and twenty-seven sub-categories included in the regional targets for 2022 and 2025 considered the most relevant at national level. The eligibility criteria are those subcategories covered by the National Law and subcategories that represent the main sources of Na in the Argentine population diet.
Of these products, 51·1 % (n 741) were found to exceed the regional target for Na content (mg/100 g) for 2022 and 57·9 % (n 840) for 2025. Products were found in all categories that exceeded the regional targets for 2022 and 2025 (Table 3).
We observed that the highest percentage of products that exceeded the regional targets for 2022 were the following: uncooked bacon – belly (n 1, 100 %), nuts, seeds, and kernels, seasoned and candied (n 34, 94·4 %), pantry and hearth bread, rolls and buns (n 90, 88·2 %), patés and meat spreads (n 11, 84·6 %), sausages – uncooked (n 5, 83·3 %), mayonnaise (n 23, 74·2 %), chips, popcorn, and/or extruded snacks (n 73, 72·3 %), packaged dry-cured deli meats – dry cured, fermented, no thermal process (n 15, 71·4 %), pretzels and snack mixes (n 2, 66·7 %) and other bread products (n 75, 63·6 %) (Table 3 and Fig. 2). The main sub-categories that exceeding the 2025 regional targets were uncooked bacon – belly (n 1, 100 %), sausages – uncooked (n 6, 100 %), nuts, seeds, and kernels, seasoned and candied (n 34, 94·4 %), mayonnaise (n 29, 93·5 %), pantry and hearth bread, rolls and buns (n 91, 89·2 %), noodles in broth (n 24, 88·9 %), pates and meat spreads (n 11, 84·6 %), packaged dry-cured deli meats – dry cured, fermented, no thermal process (n 17, 81 %), chips, popcorn, and/or extruded snacks (n 78, 77·2 %) and burgers, meatballs, meatloaf and breaded meat and poultry (n 48, 72·7 %) (Table 3 and Fig. 3).
Table S1 shows the analysis comparing total regional targets for 2022 and 2025 including fifteen categories and sixty-three sub-categories. The other twelve categories were excluded because no matches were found with PAHO categories.
Discussion
This study is the third analysis of Na content in processed foods as reported in the nutrition facts table performed in Argentina. It is part of an ongoing effort to independently monitor the implementation of the National Law. Previous analyses were performed in 2014(Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Ponce25) and 2018(Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Guarnieri26) with the same methodology.
Although Argentina was one of the pioneering countries in the LAC region in promoting mandatory policies to reduce Na intake and while the law was updated in 2019 to incorporate stricter maximum limits as in the case of soups and include new categories such as mayonnaise and ketchup, the results of this study demonstrate there is still considerable room for improvement. In the first place, the current study identifies a high level of compliance with the national Na targets and a significant variability in the Na content within the same category, which has certain implications that are noteworthy in the context of current policy. Likewise, the finding that more than 50 % of the products exceed regional targets, both with respect to the limits for 2022 and 2025, poses challenges that deserve highlighting.
First and foremost, the present study demonstrated that the existing limits are too lax and need further adjustment. The results indicate that the majority of products covered by national regulations already meet the established maximum Na levels. This finding is consistent with previous local evidence(Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Guarnieri26), and monitoring evaluations conducted by the Argentinean Ministry of Health(30,31) . Simultaneously, the significant variability in Na content within each category suggests that it is possible to reduce the levels of this critical nutrient without compromising the organoleptic characteristics of the product. This aligns with previous analyses conducted in Argentina(Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Ponce25,Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Guarnieri26) and in other countries that have observed high variability in Na content within each category, especially in categories such as processed meats and fish(Reference Nieto, Tolentino-Mayo and Medina32,Reference Song, Li and Guo33) .
Second, it is important to update the law to include new targets for those food categories with the highest Na content and that represent the main Na dietary source. For example, meat and fish condiments, leavening flour and appetisers, which were identified among the categories with the highest Na content and that are not yet included in the Argentinean law require the application of maximum limits. Furthermore, it is important to consider that a wider range of processed and packaged food categories that contribute significantly to high Na diets, such as cheese and puff pastry,(Reference Elorriaga, Gutierrez and Romero34) and that were also identified in this study among the categories with the highest maximum values of the nutrient, should be added.
Third, the findings of the current study underscore the urgent necessity to advocate for a comprehensive and systematic surveillance approach aimed at fortifying the monitoring and enforcement system. Both this study and prior local research(Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Ponce25,Reference Allemandi, Tiscornia and Guarnieri26) consistently reveal that products falling into categories such as bread and processed meats are in violation of the law and have been identified as categories with the extreme upper limits of sodium content. The latest state monitoring reports from the year 2019 also highlight violations within the snack category(31). This underscores the importance of implementing, at a minimum, annual monitoring by the government across all food categories covered by the law, extending to the monitoring of breads sold directly in bakeries.
Finally, a key conclusion drawn from the present research highlights the imperative need to revise the National Sodium Reduction Law in alignment with regional public health standards. The results reveal that, when comparing the Na content of products against regional targets, more than 51 % exceed the regional target for sodium content (mg/100 g) for 2022, and this proportion increases to over 57 % for 2025. This stark contrast is largely attributable to the fact that regional targets encompass a broader range of categories than the National Law. Furthermore, even within categories already addressed by the National Law, such as processed meats or savory snacks, the PAHO targets impose more stringent limits. It is worth noting that regional targets were established based on the Na levels in products within each food category across various countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. These targets aim to achieve reductions of 15 % and 30 % by 2022 and 2025, respectively, contributing to the global objective of reducing Na consumption in the population(35). Also, at a global level, WHO published in 2021 Sodium benchmarks for different food categories that complement the national and regional efforts and tend to serve as a global standard for the monitoring of Na content in food products(36). Although to date there have been no studies demonstrating the potential dietary and health impact resulting from the adoption of PAHO’s regional targets, in Australia, it has been estimated that meeting the WHO’s sodium benchmarks for packaged foods could lead to a decrease of 404 mg/d in the average Na intake among adults, equivalent to a 12 % reduction(Reference Trieu, Coyle and Rosewarne37). Furthermore, in Canada, a simulation modeling study estimated that fully meeting current voluntary sodium reduction targets in processed foods could result in a reduction of 459 mg/d in Na intake, representing an approximate 17 % decrease. This reduction could potentially avert or delay 2176 (95 % UI 869–3687) deaths from CVD(Reference Flexner, Christoforou and Bernstein38).
It is noteworthy to mention that Argentina has enacted a comprehensive law, the ‘Promotion of Healthy Food Law,’ aimed at fostering healthy food environments(39). This legislation, fully implemented in November 2023, complements ongoing national initiatives to reduce sodium intake in Argentinean food products. The law incorporates front-of-pack labeling, enabling consumers to easily and accurately identify products containing excessive amounts of critical nutrients such as Na, sugar or fat. The thresholds for these labels are established by the Pan American Health Organization Nutrient profile model, which is based on the WHO Population Nutrient Intake Goals(40). Furthermore, the law encourages the food and beverage industry to lower Na levels in pre-packaged foods to avoid triggering Na warning labels. A similar regulatory approach implemented in Chile demonstrated a positive impact on the reformulation of processed foods, leading to a significant reduction in Na content in groups such as fats and oils, spices, condiments and sauces(Reference Scarpelli, Fernandes and Osiac41). Evaluations also indicated a noteworthy decrease in the proportion of products labelled as ‘high in’ Na, from 74 % to 27 %, in categories including savory spreads, cheeses, ready-to-eat meals, soups, and sausages(Reference Reyes, Smith Taillie and Popkin42). These findings illustrate the feasibility of reducing Na levels in crucial food categories. Ultimately, it is crucial that both policies, which are part of the SHAKE package,(43) are effectively implemented and monitored to prevent processed foods from becoming a major source of Na in Argentina, where the consumption of these manufactured foods is rapidly increasing(44–Reference Zapata and Rovirosa46).
This study presents certain limitations such as the fact that the Na content used for these analyses relied on food labelling values, without chemical analysis verification. The food Argentinian Food Code allows a 20 % difference between food label and laboratory value. Another limitation is that the sample is not representative of all products available in the Argentinean market, such as those sold in informal markets and bakery products; also, inter-store or regional variations in product availability were not addressed because of the small number and the location of the stores surveyed – Buenos Aires city; however, the selected stores are among the main six supermarket chains in Argentina, that altogether represent 80 % of the grocery retail market(27).
The main strength of this study is the use of a continuous standardised methodology for examining Na content of foods that allows for ongoing monitoring over time and worldwide comparisons. Furthermore, this analysis serves as a valuable instrument for autonomously overseeing the existing national policy and pinpointing areas of strength and areas that could be enhanced. The insights gained from this monitoring process can also streamline the implementation of Na reduction initiatives in other countries across the Americas.
Conclusions
To conclude, this study presents valuable input to improve the National Law in line with regional targets developed by PAHO. Results demonstrate that a large proportion of food products are already meeting the national Na reduction targets and the feasibility for further reductions. To achieve meaningful reductions in Na consumption, it is necessary to update the national Na reduction targets and to include target-setting across a broader range of food categories and subcategories. Also, this policy should be part of a comprehensive strategy to be implemented simultaneously in line with the SHAKE package recommended by the WHO to accelerate progress towards reduction of mean population intake of Na in Argentina(43).
Acknowledgements
We thank Luisina Mezzomo, Melina Kalmanovich, Bianca Alvarez and Agustina Crino for their help in collecting the data presented here; Marina Ferenc, Federico Duarte and Juliana Lettieri for their collaboration in the data entry activity; Agustín Moro and Malena Pirola for their contribution in the data analysis and Lorena Allemandi and Leendert Neverdeen from PAHO for their support of this project.
Financial support
This work was supported by the Pan American Health Organization
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Authorship
L.G., L.C. and V.T. contributed to the design, data analysis and interpretation of the work. All authors contributed to the drafting of the paper, revised it critically for important intellectual content and approved the final version.
Ethics of human subject participation
Ethical approval was not required.