Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:17:07.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Effect of Fall- and Spring-Planted Cover Crops and Residual Herbicide on Emergence Dynamics of Glyphosate-Resistant Kochia (Bassia scoparia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2024

Sachin Dhanda
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Kansas State University, Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS, USA
Vipan Kumar*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Cornell University, School of Integrative Plant Science, Soil and Crop Sciences Section, Ithaca, NY, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Vipan Kumar, Associate Professor, Cornell University, School of Integrative Plant Science, Soil and Crop Sciences Section, 1115 Bradfield Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two separate field experiments were conducted during the 2021-22 and 2022-23 growing seasons at Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center near Hays, KS to understand the emergence dynamics of glyphosate-resistant (GR) kochia [Bassia scoparia (L.) A. J. Scott] as influenced by fall- and spring-planted cover crops (CC) and residual herbicide. Study sites were under winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]-fallow rotation with a natural seedbank of GR B. scoparia. In experiment 1, fall-planted CC mixture (triticale/winter peas/radish/rapeseed) was planted after wheat harvest and terminated at triticale [xTriticosecale Wittm. Ex A. Camus [Secale x Triticum] heading stage (next spring before sorghum planting). In experiment 2, spring-planted CC mixture (oats/barley/spring peas) was planted in sorghum stubbles and terminated at oats (Avena sativa L.) heading stage. Four treatments were established in each experiment: (1) nontreated control (no CC and no herbicide), (2) chemical fallow (no CC but glyphosate + acetochlor/atrazine or flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone + dicamba were used to control weeds), (3) CC terminated with glyphosate, and (4) CC terminated with glyphosate plus residual herbicide (acetochlor/atrazine for fall-planted CC and flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone for spring-planted CC). Results indicated that fall-planted CC delayed GR B. scoparia emergence by 3 to 5 weeks whereas spring-planted CC delayed emergence by 0 to 2 weeks compared to nontreated. Fall-planted CC terminated with glyphosate plus acetochlor/atrazine reduced the cumulative emergence of GR B. scoparia by 90 to 95% compared to nontreated across both yrs. Similarly, spring-planted CC terminated with glyphosate plus flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone reduced the cumulative emergence of GR B. scoparia by 83 to 90% compared to nontreated. These results suggest that fall- or spring-planted CC in combination with residual herbicide at termination can be utilized for GR B. scoparia suppression. Results from this study will help in developing prediction models for GR B. scoparia emergence under different CC strategies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America 2024