Argumentation is concerned with reasoning in the presence of imperfect information by constructing and weighing up arguments. It is an approach for inconsistency management in which conflict is explored rather than eradicated. This form of reasoning has proved applicable to many problems in knowledge engineering that involve uncertain, incomplete or inconsistent knowledge. This paper concentrates on different issues that can be tackled by automated argumentation systems and highlights important directions in argument-oriented research in knowledge engineering.

An appropriately designed architecture of a neural network is essential to many realistic pattern-recognition tasks. A choice of just the right number of neurons, and their interconnections, can cut learning costs by orders of magnitude, and still warrant high classification accuracy. Surprisingly, textbooks often neglect this issue. A specialist seeking systematic information will soon realize that relevant material is scattered over diverse sources, each with a different perspective, terminology and goals. This brief survey attempts to rectify the situation by explaining the involved aspects, and by describing some of the fundamental techniques.

The current trends of research in information access as emerged from the 1999 Workshop on Logical and Uncertainty Models for Information Systems (LUMIS'99) are briefly reviewed in this paper. We believe that some of these issues will be central to future research on theory and applications of logical and uncertainty models for information access.

In the last few years, increasing numbers of members of the agent community have been adopting techniques from game theory and decision theory. Broadly speaking, decision theory (Raiffa, 1968) is a means of analysing which of a series of options should be taken when it is uncertain exactly what the result of taking the option will be. Decision theory concentrates on identifying the “best” decision option, where the notion of “best” is allowed to have a number of different meanings, of which the most common is that which maximises the expected utility of the decision maker. Game theory (Binmore, 1992) can be considered as a variant of decision theory in which the outcome of taking a particular decision is dependent upon the actions of another, frequently an opponent which is trying to maximise its own benefit at the cost of the decision maker. Alternatively, game theory can be considered a mechansim for analysing games between two players in which each gets to choose a move from some limited set of options and, depending on what both have chosen, each receives a payout. Since the payout one player receives depends upon the move made by the other then, to maximise its payout, each player needs to take into account the likely move taken by its opponent. From this perspective, decision theory can be considered to be the study of games played against nature, an opponent which does not look to gain the best payout, but rather acts randomly.

Knowledge-Based (KB) technology is being applied to complex problem solving and safety and business critical tasks in many application domains. Concerns have naturally arisen as to the dependability of Knowledge-Based Systems (KBS). As with any software, attention to quality and safety must be paid throughout development of a KBS, and rigorous Verification and Validation (V&V) techniques must be employed. Research in V&V of KBSs has emerged as a distinct field only in the last decade, and is intended to address issues associated with quality and safety aspects of KBSs, and to provide such applications with the same degree of dependability as conventional applications. In recent years, V&V of KBSs has been the topic of annual workshops associated with the main AI conferences, such as AAAI, IJCAI and ECAI.

One of the main reasons for the sustained activity and interest in the field of agent-based systems, apart from the obvious recognition of its value as a natural and intuitive way of understanding the world, is its reach into very many different and distinct fields of investigation. Indeed, the notions of agents and multi-agent systems are relevant to fields ranging from economics to robotics, in contributing to the foundations of the field, being influenced by ongoing research, and in providing many domains of application. While these various disciplines constitute a rich and diverse environment for agent research, the way in which they may have been linked by it is a much less considered issue. The purpose of this panel was to examine just this concern, in the relationships between different areas that have resulted from agent research. Informed by the experience of the participants in the areas of robotics, social simulation, economics, computer science and artificial intelligence, the discussion was lively and sometimes heated.