Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:11:34.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the reliability of raptor pellets in recording local small mammal diversity – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2022

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correction
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2022

In the original publication of Viteri et al (2021), an error occurred in Table 2. The corrected table is reproduced on the following page. In addition, a textual error occurred in the Results section. The corrected text is reproduced below:

Table 2.

* GHOW = great horned owl, SEOW = short-eared owl, LEOW = long-eared owl, RTH = red-tailed hawk,

SWH =  Swainson's hawk

The standardized richness (SQS) for each site-predator cohort ranged from 0.93 to 5.93 and evenness (PIE) ranged from 0.30 to 0.79 (Table 2). The majority of samples were fairly even (PIE >0.5) for all cohorts, with the exception of three of the four Hayden Valley raptors: Swainson's hawk, short-eared owl, and long-eared owl (Table 2). Hayden Valley cohorts also had the lowest raw and standardized richness (Table 2). Pellets from ravens had the highest evenness and standardized richness across all study sites (Table 2).

The authors apologize for these errors.

References

Viteri, M., Stegner, M., & Hadly, E. (2022). Assessing the reliability of raptor pellets in recording local small mammal diversity. Quaternary Research, 106, 110. doi:10.1017/qua.2021.59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 2.