Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:35:02.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barriers and enablers of implementing gestational weight gain guidelines in GP-led shared maternity care: a qualitative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

R. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, VIC 3168, Australia
T. Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, VIC 3168, Australia
K. Alexander
Affiliation:
Department of General Practice, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
D. Mazza
Affiliation:
Department of General Practice, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
H. Truby
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Level 1, 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, VIC 3168, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

Approximately fifty percent of women gain too much weight during pregnancy(Reference Goldstein and Abell1), increasing pregnancy risk(Reference Cheney and Farber2) and perpetuating the cycle of overweight and obesity(Reference Melzer and Schutz3). With approximately 1.7 million consultations each year(Reference Wong and Gordon4), shared maternity care led by general practitioners (GPs) is a crucial component of antenatal care in Australia(Reference Brodribb5). Little is known about the gestational weight gain (GWG) advice women receive in shared maternity care. Therefore, we aimed to explore GPs’ perceptions, barriers and enablers implementing GWG guidelines.

General Practitioners (n = 20) who provide shared maternity care from metropolitan and regional Victoria (Australia) were recruited via postal invitation to participate in a semi-structured interview. Questions were informed by the Theoretical Domains framework (TDF)(Reference Cane and O'Connor6) that explores barriers and enablers of guideline implementation. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and transcripts were analysed by two researchers using deductive thematic analysis(Reference Atkins and Francis7). NVivo Version 11 (QSR International) was used in the analyses and ethics approval was obtained from Monash University (REF: 7799).

Key themes regarding GPs’ awareness, knowledge and application of GWG guidelines aligned with the TDF. GPs were aware of the importance of optimal GWG for positive maternal and foetal outcomes however, other pregnancy-related issues were given priority in short consultations. Enablers were practitioner-based and included GPs’ strong sense of their professional role to provide GWG advice, and ongoing and trusting relationships with women through and beyond pregnancy. Barriers were mostly health system-based with limited time, remuneration, and restrictive referral pathways being limiting factors.

There is an urgent need to support GPs to provide GWG advice in accordance with current national guidelines(Reference Walker and Mazza8). Solutions lie in changes to policy and funding within the health-system so that longer shared care consultations are remunerated, and referrals to dietitians and other allied health professionals are accessible to women who require additional support to optimise GWG beyond what their GP can offer.

Main supervisor of PhD student, Ruth Walker: Professor Helen Truby, Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia. Email:

References

1.Goldstein, R, Abell, S et al. (2017) JAMA 317, 22072225.Google Scholar
2.Cheney, K, Farber, R et al. (2018) Med J Aust 208, 119125.Google Scholar
3.Melzer, K & Schutz, Y. (2010) Int J Obes 34, S44S52.Google Scholar
4.Wong, C, Gordon, J et al. (2016) Aust Fam Phys 45, 538541.Google Scholar
5.Brodribb, W. (2014) MJA 201, 626–267.Google Scholar
6.Cane, J, O'Connor, D et al. (2012) Implement Sci 7, 17 pages.Google Scholar
7.Atkins, L, Francis, J et al. (2017) Implement Sci 12, 18 pages.Google Scholar
8.Walker, R, Mazza, D et al. (2018) Aust J Prim Health 24, 48.Google Scholar