Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:08:49.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship of polar bodies morphology to embryo quality and pregnancy outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Wenhui Zhou ,
Lei Fu ,
Wei Sha ,
Dapeng Chu  and
Yuan Li
Wenhui Zhou
Affiliation:
Medical Center for Human Reproduction, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Lei Fu
Affiliation:
Medical Center for Human Reproduction, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Wei Sha
Affiliation:
Medical Center for Human Reproduction, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Dapeng Chu
Affiliation:
Medical Center for Human Reproduction, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Yuan Li*
Affiliation:
Medical Center for Human Reproduction, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
*
All correspondence to: Yuan Li. Medical Center for Human Reproduction, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China. Tel: +86 010 85231423. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of this study was to explore whether the morphology of polar bodies (PBs) estimated at 16–18 h after insemination can be used as an additional marker for predicting human embryo quality or pregnancy outcome. The data from 355 patients who received standard in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation were recruited. Normal fertilized 3048 zygotes from 382 cycles were divided into two groups, PBs intact or fragmented, according to the morphology of PBs assessed at 16–18 h after insemination. Embryo quality and pregnancy outcome were compared between the two groups. It was shown that the day 3 (D3) good embryo rate, good quality blastocyst rate and available embryo rate of the PBs intact group were all significantly higher than that of the corresponding fragmented groups. However, no significant differences in pregnancy rate (PR) or implantation rate (IR) were observed between the intact and fragmented groups. Although PBs morphology estimated at 16–18 h after insemination had little effect on PR or IR in fresh embryo transfer cycles, a better embryo quality can be achieved in the PB-intact group, which is valuable for embryo selection.

Keywords

Embryo qualityImplantation ratePolar body morphologyPregnancy rateZygote competence
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , June 2016 , pp. 401 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

3

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Aguilar, J., Motato, Y., Escribá, M.J., Ojeda, M., Muñoz, E. & Meseguer, M. (2014). The human first cell cycle: impact on implantation. Reprod. Biomed. Online 28, 475–84.Google Scholar
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine & ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. (2011). The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum. Reprod. 26, 1270–83.Google Scholar
Ciotti, P.M., Notarangelo, L., Morselli-Labate, A.M., Felletti, V., Porcu, E. & Venturoli, S. (2004). First polar body morphology before ICSI is not related to embryo quality or pregnancy rate. Hum. Reprod. 19, 2334–9.Google Scholar
Durban, M., Benet, J., Boada, M., Fernandez, E., Calafell, J.M., Lailla, J.M., Sanchez-Garcia, J.F., Pujol, A., Egozcue, J. & Navarro, J. (2001). PGD in female carriers of balanced robertsonian and reciprocal translocations by first polar body analysis. Hum. Reprod. 7, 591–602.Google Scholar
Ebner, T., Moser, M., Sommergruber, M., Yaman, C., Pfleger, U. & Tews, G. (2002). First polar body morphology and blastocyst formation rate in ICSI patients. Hum. Reprod. 17, 2415–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebner, T., Moser, M., Yaman, C., Feichtinger, O., Hartl, J. & Tews, G. (1999). Elective transfer of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology is associated with increased rates of implantation and pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 72, 599–603.Google Scholar
Ebner, T., Yaman, C., Moser, M., Sommergruber, M., Feichtinger, O. & Tews, G. (2000). Prognostic value of first polar body morphology on fertilization rate and embryo quality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod. 15, 427–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabian, D., Čikoš, Š., Rehák, P. & Koppel, J. (2012). Do embryonic polar bodies commit suicide? Zygote 22, 10–7.Google Scholar
Fancsovits, P., Tothne, Z.G., Murber, Á., Takacs, F.Z., Parp, Z. & Urbancsek, J. (2006). Correlation between first polar body morphology and further embryo development. Acta Biol. Hungarica 57, 331–8.Google Scholar
Gardner, D.K. & Schoolcraft, W.B. (1999). In vitro culture of human blastocyst. In Towards Reproductive Certainty: Infertility and Genetics Beyond 1999 (eds Jansen, R. & Mortimer, D.), pp. 378–88. Carnforth: Parthenon Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.L. (1997). The early blastocyst is bilaterally symmetrical and its axis of symmetry is aligned with the animal-vegetal axis of the zygote in the mouse. Development 124, 289–301.Google Scholar
Halvaei, I., Khalili, M.A., Soleimani, M. & Razi, M.H. (2011). Evaluating the role of first polar body morphology on rates of fertilization and embryo development in ICSI cycles. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 5, 110–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Jiao, Z.X. & Woodruff, T.K. (2013). Detection and quantification of maternal-effect gene transcripts in mouse second polar bodies: potential markers of embryo developmental competence. Fertil. Steril. 99, 2055–61Google Scholar
Munné, S., Dailey, T., Sultan, K.M., Grifo, J. & Cohen, J. (1995). Diagnosing and preventing inherited disease: The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Hum. Reprod. 10, 1014–20.Google Scholar
Navarro, P.A., de Araújo, M.M., de Araújo, C.M., Rocha, M., dos Reis, R. & Martins, W. (2009). Relationship between first polar body morphology before intracytoplasmic sperm injection and fertilization rate, cleavage rate and embryo quality. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 104, 226–9.Google Scholar
Ortiz, M, Lucero, P. & Coxatto, H. (1983). Post ovulatory aging of human ova: spontaneous division of the first polar body. Gamete Res. 7, 269–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, A., Klatsky, P., Carson, S. & Wessel, G. (2011). The transcriptome of a human polar body accurately reflects its sibling oocyte. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 40743–9.Google Scholar
Verlinsky, Y. (2003). Is there any predictive value of first polar body morphology for embryo genotype or developmental potential? Reprod. BioMed. 7, 336–41.Google Scholar
Younis, J.S., Radin, O., Izhaki, I. & Ben-Ami, M. (2009). Does first polar body morphology predict oocyte performance during ICSI treatment. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 26, 561–7.Google Scholar