Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:10:45.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli) in Western Irrigated Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. H. Miller ,
H. M. Kempen ,
J. A. Wilkerson  and
C. L. Foy
J. H. Miller
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture
H. M. Kempen
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of California, Davis
J. A. Wilkerson
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of California, Davis—now Agricultural Research, Naugatuck Chemicals, Portland, Oregon
C. L. Foy
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of California, Davis
Get access

Extract

Improved methods of weed control through use of herbicides offer important means of reducing production costs and labor requirements in irrigated cotton. The use of pre-emergence herbicides has proved to be an effective tool for annual-weed control in cotton in the humid southeastern cotton region of the United States. Research in Arizona has shown that certain herbicides applied at layby (immediately after the last cultivation) are effective for the control of late-season annual weeds in cotton.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 1961 , pp. 273 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H. F., and Hamilton, K. C. Chemical control of annual weeds in cotton. Arizona Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 283. 1957.Google Scholar
2. Carter, L. M., Colwick, R. F., and Tavernetti, J. R. Evaluation of flame burner design for weed control in cotton. Published in Transactions of the ASAE 3:2 125–128. 1960.Google Scholar
3. Everson, E. H., and Arle, H. F. Effect of CMU on cotton. Weeds 4:148–155. 1956.Google Scholar
4. Foy, C. L., and Miller, J. H. Weed control in California cotton. Proc. WWCC 15:100–104. 1956.Google Scholar
5. McWhorter, C. G., and Holstun, J. T. Progress report of CIPC and diuron for pre-emergence weed control in cotton. Proc. SWC 10:31–38. 1957.Google Scholar
6. Miller, J. H., and Foy, C. L. Survey of weed problems associated with California cotton production. Proc. SWC 9:32–35. 1956.Google Scholar
7. Miller, J. H., and Kempen, H. M. Evaluation of pre-emergence herbicides when soil incorporated for annual grass control in cotton. Res. Rpt. WWCC 45–56. 1960.Google Scholar
8. Porter, W. K. Jr., Thomas, C. H., Curtis, L. F., and Melville, D. R. A critical evaluation of the use of pre-emergence herbicides for weed control in cotton. Weeds 5:237–242. 1957.Google Scholar
9. Stanton, H. S., and Tavernetti, J. R. Newest engineering developments of flame cultivation in cotton. Proc. WWCC 15:140–145. 1956.Google Scholar
10. Tavernetti, J. R., and Miller, H. F. Studies on mechanization of cotton farming in California. California Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 747. 1954.Google Scholar