Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:11:13.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Conservation Tillage Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Wayne Keeling ,
C. Gary Henniger  and
John R. Abernathy
J. Wayne Keeling
Affiliation:
Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401
C. Gary Henniger
Affiliation:
Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401
John R. Abernathy
Affiliation:
Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Horseweed is a major weed in conservation tillage production systems. Herbicides were evaluated for horseweed control at two growth stages, rosette and 10- to 15-cm tall. Horseweed was controlled at the rosette stage with the 2,4-D ester, 2,4-D amine, dicamba, 2,4-D plus glyphosate, and glyphosate. Higher rates were needed for control at the 10- to 15-cm stage. Paraquat did not effectively control horseweed at any stage.

Keywords

2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-acetic aciddicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, paraquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ioncotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.)Cronq. #3 ERICAsorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.)Moench2,4-Ddicambaglyphosateno-till
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 399 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, S. M., and Whitwell, T. 1988. Influence of tillage on horseweed, Conyza canadensis . Weed Technol. 2:269–270.Google Scholar
2. Correll, D. S., and Johnston, M. C. 1979. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Univ. Tex. Printing Div., Austin, TX. p. 1608.Google Scholar
3. Hayes, R. M., Hoskinson, P. E., and Tyler, D. D. 1988. Weed control systems for no-till cotton. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Conf., p. 383.Google Scholar
4. Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean [Glycine max (L.)Merr.] weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27:520–526.Google Scholar
5. Keeling, J. W., and Abernathy, J. R. 1988. Weed control systems for conservation tillage cotton production on sandy soils. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 28:21.Google Scholar
6. Shelby, P. W., and Hayes, R. M. 1988. Preplant horseweed control for no-till cotton and soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:294.Google Scholar
7. Triplett, G. B. Jr., and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453–457.Google Scholar
8. Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Bellinger, R. R., and Grande, J. H. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0224, paraquat, and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33:531–536.Google Scholar