Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:38:57.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Response to Simulated Herbicide Spray Drift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
N. W. Res. and Ext. Cent., Wash. State Univ., Mt. Vernon, WA 98273
Robert Parker
Affiliation:
Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Cent., Wash. State Univ., Prosser, WA 99350
E. Patrick Fuerst
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soils, Wash. State Univ., Pullman, WA 99163

Abstract

‘Vernal’ alfalfa response was evaluated when chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, 2,4-D, glyphosate, bromoxynil, and selected combinations of those herbicides were applied at rates simulating spray drift during the fourth trifoliolate leaf stage following the first cutting in 1990 and 1991. The order of phytotoxicity was 2,4-D > chlorsulfuron > thifensulfuron > glyphosate > bromoxynil. By the end of each growing season, alfalfa had recovered from injury caused by all herbicides except the highest rates of 2,4-D and 2,4-D plus glyphosate. The alfalfa stand was reduced only by 2,4-D and 2,4-D plus glyphosate. All herbicides caused characteristic symptoms, but some specific symptoms were similar among different herbicides or resembled symptoms caused by disease, mineral imbalance, and adverse weather conditions.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylurea. p. 117189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Clore, W. J. 1972. 2,4-D on Concord grapes. Wash. State Grape Soc. Proc. Grandview, WA. 2:2932.Google Scholar
3. Dawson, J. 1989. Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) control in established alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with glyphosate and SC-0224. Weed Technol. 3:552559.Google Scholar
4. Dawson, J. 1989. Established forage alfalfa (Medicago sativa) tolerates glyphosate and SC-0224 applied to control dodder (Cuscuta spp.). Weed Technol. 3:560565.Google Scholar
5. Kelling, K. A. 1990. Nutrient deficiencies and toxicities. p. 6770 in Stuteville, D. L. and Erwin, D. C., eds. Compendium of Alfalfa Diseases. APS Press. St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
6. Malik, N. and Waddington, J. 1990. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seed yield response to herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:6367.Google Scholar
7. Mårtensson, A. M. and Nilsson, Åsa K. 1989. Effect of chlorsulfuron on Rhizobium grown in pure culture and in symbiosis with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and red clover (Trifolium pratense). Weed Sci. 37:445450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. W., and Kutner, M. H. 1985. Residual analysis. p. 609615 in Applied Linear Statistical Models, Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design. 2nd ed. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
9. Reisinger, L. M. and Robinson, E. 1976. Long-distance transport of 2,4-D. J. Appl. Meteor. 15:836845.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Robinson, E. and Fox, L. L. 1978. 2,4-D herbicide in central Washington. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 28:10151020.Google Scholar
11. Triplett, G. B. Jr., Van Keuren, R. W., and Walker, J. D. 1977. Influence of 2,4-D, pronamide, and simazine on dry matter production and botanical composition of an alfalfa-grass sward. Crop Sci. 17:6165.Google Scholar
12. Wilson, R. G. 1986. Weed control in irrigated alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Sci. 34:423426.Google Scholar