Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:30:23.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persistence, Efficacy, and Selectivity of Amide Herbicides in Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ioannis B. Vasilakoglou
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, Box 233, University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
Ilias G. Eleftherohorinos*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, Box 233, University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Persistence of microencapsulated (ME) and emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulations of alachlor and acetochlor, as well as EC formulations of metolachlor, s-metolachlor, dimethenamid, and flufenacet were studied using a bioassay based on root response of oat Kassandra grown in soil. Flufenacet was the most persistent of the herbicides, but biologically available residues were not detected at 0- to 10-cm soil depth 50 d after any herbicide treatment. All herbicides applied preemergence (PRE) in field trials gave good to excellent control of redroot pigweed, black nightshade, barnyardgrass, and green foxtail but only partial control of jimsonweed. Furthermore, when they were applied postemergence (POST) in mixture with atrazine in the field, the control obtained for black nightshade, common lambsquarters, common purslane, and redroot pigweed was excellent, but good to excellent for bristly foxtail and green foxtail. Their efficacy against yellow foxtail and large crabgrass was fair to good. Generally, the EC-alachlor and EC-acetochlor applied POST in mixture with atrazine gave better control of grasses than did their ME-formulations. None of the herbicide treatments showed any phytotoxic effect on corn, and all of them produced corn yield greater than that of weedy control but slightly lower than that of the weed-free control. Flufenacet, s-metolachlor, and dimethenamid were suitable alternatives to acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor.

Type
Note
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beestman, G. B. and Deming, J. M. 1974. Dissipation of acetanilide herbicides from soils. Agron. J. 66: 308311.Google Scholar
Bowman, B. T. 1990. Mobility and persistence of alachlor, atrazine and metolachlor in plainfield sand, and atrazine and isazofos in honeywood silt loam, using field lysimeters. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9: 453461.Google Scholar
Braverman, M. P., Lavy, T. L., and Barnes, C. J. 1986. The degradation and bioactivity of metolachlor in the soil. Weed Sci. 34: 479484.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. F. and Zheng, S. Q. 1994. Behaviour of metolachlor on tropical and Mediterranean plain field conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 153: 133139.Google Scholar
Deasy, P. B. 1984. Microencapsulation and Related Drug Processes. New York: Marcel-Dekker. 361 p.Google Scholar
Doub, J. P., Wilson, H. P., and Hatzios, K. K. 1988. Comparative efficacy of two formulations of alachlor and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 36: 221226.Google Scholar
El-Nahhal, Y., Nir, S., Polubesova, T., Margulies, L., and Rubin, B. 1998. Leaching, phytotoxicity, and weed control of new formulations of alachlor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46: 33053313.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G. 1987. Herbicide dissipation from soil with different herbicide use histories. Weed Sci. 35: 583589.Google Scholar
Huang, Q. L. and Ahrens, J. F. 1991. Residues of alachlor in soil after application of controlled release and conventional formulations. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 47: 362367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R. E. Jr., Banks, P. A., and Radcliffe, D. E. 1990. Alachlor and metribuzin movement and dissipation in a soil profile as influenced by soil surface condition. Weed Sci. 38: 589597.Google Scholar
Jurado-Exposito, M. and Walker, A. 1998. Degradation of isoproturon, propyzamide and alachlor in soil with constant and variable incubation conditions. Weed Res. 38: 309318.Google Scholar
Kotoula-Syka, E., Hatzios, K. K., Berry, D. F., and Wilson, H. P. 1997. Degradation of acetanilide herbicides in history and nonhistory soils from eastern Virginia. Weed Technol. 11: 403409.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Shaw, D. R., and Witt, W. W. 1999. Relative dissipation of acetochlor, alachlor, metolachlor, and SAN 582 from three surface soils. Weed Technol. 13: 341346.Google Scholar
Negre, M., Gennari, M., Raimondo, E., Celi, L., Trevisan, M., and Capri, E. 1992. Alachlor dissipation in soil as influenced by formulation and soil moisture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40: 10711075.Google Scholar
Noldin, J. A., Chandler, J. M., McCauley, G. N., and Sij, J. W. 1998. Red rice (Oryza sativa) and Echinochloa spp. control in Texas gulf coast soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12: 677683.Google Scholar
Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of alachlor and metolachlor as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33: 874881.Google Scholar
Petersen, B. B., Shea, P. J., and Wicks, G. A. 1988. Acetanilide activity and dissipation as influenced by formulation and wheat stubble. Weed Sci. 36: 243249.Google Scholar
Rahman, A. and James, T. K. 1994. Field persistence of some maize herbicides in two soils. Proceedings of the 47th New Zealand Plant Protection Conference. Waitangi, New Zealand: New Zealand Plant Protection Society. pp. 610.Google Scholar
Rouchaud, J., Neus, O., Cools, K., and Bulcke, R. 1999. Flufenacet soil persistence and mobility in corn and wheat crops. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 63: 460466.Google Scholar
Tonks, D. J., Eberlein, C. V., Gutteri, M. J., and Brinkman, B. A. 1999. SAN 582 efficacy and tolerance in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 13: 7176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasilakoglou, I. B. and Eleftherohorinos, I. G. 1997. Activity, adsorption, mobility, efficacy, and persistence of alachlor as influenced by formulation. Weed Sci. 45: 579585.Google Scholar
Vasilakoglou, I. B., Eleftherohorinos, I. G., and Dhima, K. V. 2001. Activity, adsorption and mobility of three acetanilide and two new amide herbicides. Weed Res. 41: 535546.Google Scholar
Walker, A. and Brown, P. A. 1985. The relative persistence in soil of five acetanilide herbicides. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 34: 143149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, A., Moon, Y., and Welch, S. J. 1992. Influence of temperature, soil moisture and characteristics on the persistence of alachlor. Pestic. Sci. 35: 109116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1981. Simulation of the persistence of atrazine, linuron and metolachlor in soil at different sites in the USA. Weed Res. 21: 255265.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Hatzios, K. K., and Doub, J. P. 1988. Efficacy comparisons of alachlor and metolachlor formulations in the field. Weed Technol. 2: 2427.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. and Clark, S. K. 1982. Degradation of three acetanilide herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 30: 545548.Google Scholar