Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:34:24.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and Development of Bigroot Morningglory (Ipomoea pandurata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael J. Horak  and
Loyd M. Wax
Michael J. Horak
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Crop Prot. Res., Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Crop Prot. Res., Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growth and development of bigroot morningglory was observed and quantified. Emergence occurred 75 ± 5 growing degree days (GDD) after seeding. Flower and seed production began 630 ± 20 GDD after emergence and continued until the first frost killed the shoots. Seedlings needed approximately 460 GDD of growth to become perennial. In the second year of growth, plants emerged in early May and flowered within 425 ± 50 GDD. Shoot dry weight accumulation in first-year plants was 3.5 g for the first 600 GDD after which a fifteenfold increase in dry weight occurred. Root growth followed the same pattern, however the large increase in dry weight occurred approximately 300 GDD later than that of the shoots. The root:shoot ratio was 0.2 to 0.3 for the first 900 GDD and increased to greater than 1.0 by the final harvest.

Keywords

Bigroot morningglory, Ipomoea pandurata (L.) G. F. W. Meyer ♯ IPOPAGrowing degree daysphotosynthate partitioningthermal time
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 805 - 810
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Britton, N. L., and Brown, A. 1936. p. 43 in Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada, and the British Possessions. Lancaster Press, Inc. Lancaster, PA.Google Scholar
2. Degennaro, F. P., and Weller, S. C. 1984. Growth and reproductive characteristics of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes. Weed Sci. 32:525–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Horak, M. J., and Wax, L. M. 1991. Germination and seedling development of bigroot morningglory (Ipomoea pandurata). Weed Sci. 39:390–396.Google Scholar
4. Incoll, L. D., and Neales, T. F. 1969. The stem as a temporary sink before tuberization in Helianthus tuberosus . L. J. Exp. Bot. 21:469–476.Google Scholar
5. Leif, J. W. III, and Oelke, E. A. 1990. Growth and development of giant burreed (Sparganium eurycarpum). Weed Technol. 4:849–854.Google Scholar
6. Marshall, G. 1986. Growth and development of field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.). Weed Sci. 34:271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Radosevich, S. R., and Holt, J. S. 1984. p. 198–203 in Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. Wiley and Sons Inc. New York.Google Scholar
8. Russelle, M. P., Wilhelm, W. W., Olson, R. A., and Power, J. F. 1984. Growth analysis based on degree days. Crop Sci. 24:28–32.Google Scholar
9. Southern Weed Science Society, Weed Identification Committee. p. 4 IPOPA in Weed Identification Guide, 1st ed. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Publ. Google Scholar
10. Tanphiphat, K., and Appleby, A. P. 1990. Growth and development of bulbous oatgrass (Arrhenatherum elatius var. bulbosum). Weed Technol. 4:843–848.Google Scholar
11. Wax, L. M., Fawcett, R. S., and Isley, D. 1981. p. 143 in Weeds of the North Central States. North Central Regional Research Publ. No. 281.Google Scholar
12. Weed Loss Committee, Jordan, T. N. chairman. 1985. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 42:344–355.Google Scholar
13. Williams, R. D. 1981. Growth and reproduction of Cyperus esculentus L. and Cyperus rotundus L. Weed Res. 22:149–154.Google Scholar