Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:13:46.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compatibility of Diclosulam with Postemergence Herbicides and Fungicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sarah H. Lancaster ,
Joshua B. Beam ,
James E. Lanier ,
David L. Jordan  and
P. Dewayne Johnson
Sarah H. Lancaster
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Joshua B. Beam
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
James E. Lanier
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David L. Jordan*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
P. Dewayne Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diclosulam is registered for residual and postemergence control of several broadleaf weeds and suppression of annual sedges in peanut in the southeastern United States. Many producers apply herbicides and other pesticides simultaneously to increase the spectrum of pest control or to increase efficiency of operations. However, compatibility of coapplication of pesticides is a concern. Field trials were conducted to evaluate the compatibility of diclosulam with other herbicides and fungicides. Horseweed control by diclosulam in combination with glyphosate, sulfosate, or paraquat was compared to combinations of these herbicides with flumioxazin, tribenuron plus thifensulfuron, or 2,4-D. All treatments that contained diclosulam controlled horseweed at least 86%. Broadleaf signalgrass control by clethodim and sethoxydim was not affected by diclosulam; however, large crabgrass control was reduced when graminicides were coapplied with diclosulam. Common ragweed control was reduced when diclosulam was applied with chlorothalonil and pyraclostrobin but not by azoxystrobin or tebuconazole.

Keywords

Bentazonclethodimdiclosulamflumioxazinglyphosateparaquatsethoxydimsulfosatethifensulfurontribenuronbroadleaf signalgrass, Bracharia platyphylla (Nash) R. D. Webster BRAPPcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. AMBELhorseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICAlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSApeanut, Arachis hypogaea L.Antagonismintegrated pest managementpesticide compatibility
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 869 - 872
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Burke, I. C., Price, A. J., Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Culpepper, A. S., and Tredaway-Ducar, J. 2004. Annual grass control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with clethodim and imazapic. Weed Technol. 18:88–92.Google Scholar
Crooks, H. L., York, A. C., Culpepper, A. S., and Brownie, C. 2003. CGA-362622 antagonizes annual grass control by graminicides in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 17:373–380.Google Scholar
Everman, W. J., Clewis, S. B., Taylor, Z. G., and Wilcut, J. W. 2006. Influence of diclosulam postemergence application timing on weed control and peanut tolerance. Weed Technol. 20:651–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascho, G. J. and Davis, J. G. 1995. Soil fertility and plant nutrition. Pages 383–418. in Pattee, H.E., Stalker, H.T. eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK American Peanut Research and Education Society.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Besler, B. A., Brewer, K. D., and Baughman, T. A. 2002. Grass control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with clethodim and selected broadleaf herbicide combinations. Peanut Sci. 29:85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. 2006. International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Herbicide Resistance Action Committee, North American Herbicide Resistance Action Committee, and Weed Science Society of America. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed April 9, 2007.Google Scholar
Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1995. Influence of adjuvants on the antagonism of graminicides by broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 9:741–747.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 2007. Weed management in peanuts. Pages 47–74. 132. in. 2007 Peanut Information. North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Service Series AG-331.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Culpepper, A. S., Grichar, W. J., Tredaway Ducar, J., Brecke, B. J., and York, A. C. 2003. Weed control with combinations of selected fungicides and herbicides applied postemergence to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Peanut Sci. 30:1–7.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and Johnson, P. D. 2006. Reduced tillage research with peanut in North Carolina (1997–2005). Pages 134–140. in Schartz, R.C., Baumhardt, R.L., Bell, J.M. eds. Proceedings of the Southern Conservation Tillage Systems Conference, Vol. 28. Amarillo, TX, June 26–28, 2006. USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory Report No. 06-1. http://www.ag.auburn.edu/aux/nsdl/sctcsa.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Robinson, B. L., and Johnson, P. D. 2007. How to lose a really good weed management field in a hurry. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. In press.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Poston, D. H., Hayes, R. M., and Montgomery, R. F. 2004. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Mississippi. Weed Technol. 18:820–825.Google Scholar
Lancaster, S. H., Jordan, D. L., Beam, J. B., Lanier, J. E., and Johnson, P. D. 2006. Influence of application variables on peanut and weed response to diclosulam (Strongarm) applied postemergence. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Ed. Soc. In press.Google Scholar
Lancaster, S. H., Jordan, D. L., Spears, J. F., York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., Monks, D. W., Batts, R. B., and Brandenburg, R. L. 2005a. Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) control and seed production after 2,4-DB applied alone and with fungicides or insecticides. Weed Technol. 19:451–455.Google Scholar
Lancaster, S. H., Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Burke, I. C., Corbin, F. T., Sheldon, Y. S., Wilcut, J. W., and Monks, D. W. 2005b. Influence of selected fungicides on efficacy of clethodim and sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 19:397–403.Google Scholar
Lynch, R. E. and Mack, T. P. 1995. Biological and biotechnical advances for insect management in peanut. Pages 95–159. in Pattee, H.E., Stalker, H.T. eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK American Peanut Research and Education Society.Google Scholar
Main, C. T., Mueller, T. C., Hayes, R. M., and Wilkerson, J. B. 2004. Response of selected horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) populations to glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:879–883.Google Scholar
Price, A. J., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. R. 2002. Flumioxazin preplant burndown weed management in strip-tillage cotton. Weed Technol. 16:762–767.Google Scholar
Prostko, E. P. 2004. Strongarm applied postemergence in Georgia peanut. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 36:30.Google Scholar
Sherwood, J. L., Beute, M. K., Dickson, D. W., Elliot, V. J., Nelson, R. S., Opperman, C. H., and Shew, B. B. 1995. Biological and biotechnical control in Arachis diseases. Pages 160–206. in Pattee, H.E., Stalker, H.T. eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK American Peanut Research and Education Society.Google Scholar
Shew, B. 2007. Peanut disease management. in. 2007 Peanut Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Service Series AG-331 94–118.132.Google Scholar
Trainer, G. D., Loux, M. M., Harrison, S. K., and Regnier, E. 2005. Response of horseweed biotypes to foliar applications of cloransulam-methyl and glyphosate. Weed Technol. 19:231–236.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci. 49:703–705.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Ayeni, A. O., and Majek, B. A. 1999. Glyphosate in double-crop no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean: Role of preplant applications and residual herbicides. Weed Technol. 15:703–713.Google Scholar
Wiese, A. F., Salisbury, C. D., and Bean, B. W. 1995. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), and horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in fallow. Weed Technol. 9:249–254.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., Grichar, W. J., and Wehtje, G. R. 1995. The biology and management of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Pages 207–224. in Pattee, H.E., Stalker, H.T. eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater American Peanut Research and Education Society.Google Scholar
York, A. C., Jordan, D. L., Culpepper, A. S., and Stewart, A. M. 2004. Response of strip-tilled cotton to applications of dicamba and 2,4-D. J. Cotton Sci. 8:213–222.Google Scholar