Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:05:01.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean canopy formation effects on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) emergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason K. Norsworthy
Jason K. Norsworthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Soils, and Plant Sciences, Clemson University, 277 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2002 and 2003 to determine whether canopy formation influences pitted morningglory, common cocklebur, and sicklepod emergence in surface-tilled soybean. Each weed species was broadcast seeded before planting soybean in 19- and 97-cm-wide rows. Weed emergence beneath soybean was monitored after soybean emergence and compared with weed emergence in the absence of soybean (bareground treatment). Magnitude of daily diurnal soil temperature fluctuations diminished after soybean canopy formation, and light interception by soybean was positively related to the reduction in soil temperature. Canopy formation (50% light interception) occurred 16 to 17 d later in wide compared with narrow rows in both years. The red/far-red ratio of light available to seed on or near the soil surface was reduced from as much as 1.2 in full sunlight to less than 0.1 in the presence of a dense soybean canopy. Pitted morningglory emergence was not influenced by soybean canopy formation, whereas common cocklebur and sicklepod emergence were reduced as much as 33 and 68%, respectively. Although common cocklebur and sicklepod emergence diminished after soybean canopy formation, a small portion of the seedbank of both species emerged beneath the canopy. This research indicates that in a tilled system, emergence of some weed species is diminished by presence of an overlying canopy, but emergence does not completely cease with canopy formation. Late-season emergence of sicklepod and common cocklebur beneath a soybean canopy may contribute to replenishment of the soil seedbank, especially if these late-emerging cohorts are capable of surviving until the light environment is favorable for seed production.

Keywords

Common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. XANSTpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLAsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby CASOBsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Northrup King S73-Z5’, ‘Delta and Pineland 6880’Canopy formationweed emergencelight interceptionlight qualitysoil thermal amplitude
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 52 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 954 - 960
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Banks, P. A., Tripp, T. N., Wells, J. W., and Hammel, J. E. 1985. Effects of tillage on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference with soybeans (Glycine max) and soil water use. Weed Sci 34:143–149.Google Scholar
Bararpour, M. T. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Effect of tillage and interference on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) population, seed production, and seedbank. Weed Sci 46:424–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybean. Weed Sci 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batlla, D., Kruk, B. C., and Benech-Arnold, R. L. 2000. Very early detection of canopy presence by seeds through perception of subtle modifications in R:FR signals. Funct. Ecol 14:195–202.Google Scholar
Benech Arnold, R. L., Ghersa, C. M., Sanchez, R. A., and Garcia Fernandez, A. E. 1988. The role of fluctuating temperatures in the germination and establishment of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. regulation of germination under leaf canopies. Funct. Ecol 2:311–318.Google Scholar
Benvenuti, S. 1995. Soil light penetration and dormancy of jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) seeds. Weed Sci 43:389–393.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. and Bauman, P. C. 1992. Weeds causing losses in the United States. Pages 75–147 in Bridges, D. C. ed. Crop Losses Due to Weeds in the United States, 1992. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. and Walker, R. H. 1987. Economics of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) management. Weed Sci 35:594–598.Google Scholar
Deregibus, V. A., Casal, J. J., Jacobo, E. J., Gibson, D., Kauffman, M., and Rodriguez, A. M. 1994. Evidence that heavy grazing may promote the germination of Lolium multiflorum seeds via phytochrome-mediated perception of high red/far-red ratios. Funct. Ecol 8:536–542.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. 1998. Real-time assessment of seed dormancy and seedling growth for weed management. Seed Sci. Res 8:201–209.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Benech-Arnold, R. L., Sanchez, R., and Ghersa, C. M. 2000. Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Res 67:123–139.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M., Benech Arnold, R., and Martinez-Ghersa, M. A. 1992. The role of fluctuating temperatures in germination and establishment of Sorghum halepense. Regulation of germination at increasing depths. Funct. Ecol 6:460–468.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M., Martinez-Ghersa, M. A., Casal, J. J., Kaufman, M., Roush, M. L., and Deregibus, V. A. 1994. Effect of light on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) competition. Weed Technol 8:37–45.Google Scholar
Gomes, L. F., Chandler, J. M., and Vaughan, C. E. 1978. Aspects of germination, emergence, and seed production of three Ipomoea taxa. Weed Sci 26:245–248.Google Scholar
Gorski, T. 1975. Germination of seeds in the shadow of plants. Physiol. Plant 34:342–346.Google Scholar
Huarte, H. R. and Benech Arnold, R. L. 2003. Understanding mechanisms of reduced annual weed emergence in alfalfa. Weed Sci 51:876–885.Google Scholar
King, T. J. 1975. Inhibition of seed germination under leaf canopies in Arenaria serpyllifolia, Veronica arvensis and Cerastum holosteroides . New Phytol 75:87–90.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, M. L., Cloutier, D. C., Legere, A., Lemieux, C., Assemat, L., Benoit, D. L., and Hamel, C. 2002. Effect of the presence or absence of corn on common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) and barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.] emergence. Weed Technol 16:638–644.Google Scholar
Milberg, P. and Andersson, L. 1997. Seasonal variation in dormancy and light sensitivity in buried seeds of eight annual weed species. Can. J. Bot 75:1998–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohler, C. L. and Calloway, M. B. 1992. Effects of tillage and mulch on the emergence and survival of weeds in sweet corn. J. Appl. Ecol 29:21–34.Google Scholar
Nice, G. R W., Buehring, N. W., and Shaw, D. R. 2001. Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) response to shading, soybean (Glycine max) row spacing, and population in three management systems. Weed Technol 15:155–162.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. 2003. Use of soybean production surveys to determine weed management needs of South Carolina farmers. Weed Technol 17:195–201.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2001. Effect of seeding rate of drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) on seed yield and gross profit margin. Weed Technol 15:284–292.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2002a. Effect of irrigation, soybean density, and glyphosate on hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference in drill-seeded soybean. Weed Technol 16:7–17.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2002b. Pitted morningglory interference in drill-seeded glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Sci 50:26–33.Google Scholar
Oryokot, J. O E. and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Effect of tillage and corn on pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) seedling emergence and density. Weed Sci 45:120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnier, E. E., Salvucci, M. E., and Stoller, E. W. 1988. Photosynthesis and growth responses to irradiance in soybean (Glycine max) and three broadleaf weeds. Weed Sci 36:487–496.Google Scholar
Roman, E. S., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1999. Effect of tillage and Zea mays on Chenopodium album seedling emergence and density. Weed Sci 47:551–556.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8.02, Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Ballare, C. L., and Sanchez, R. A. 1991. Induction of extreme light sensitivity in buried weed seeds and its role in the perception of soil cultivation. Plant Cell Environ 14:501–508.Google Scholar
Silvertown, J. 1980. Leaf-canopy-induced seed dormancy in a grassland flora. New Phytol 85:109–118.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. and Borthwick, H. A. 1969. Light filtration by foliar canopies: significance for light-controlled weed seed germination. Weed Sci 17:48–51.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. and Grime, J. P. 1983. A comparative study of germination in response to diurnally-fluctuating temperatures. J. Appl. Ecol 20:141–156.Google Scholar
Thompson, K., Grime, J. P., and Mason, G. 1977. Seed germination in responses to diurnal fluctuations of temperature. Nature 267:147–149.Google Scholar
Washitani, I. 1985. Field fate of Amaranthus patulus seeds subjected to leaf-canopy inhibition of germination. Oecologia 66:338–342.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Coble, H. D. 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol 11:308–317.Google Scholar
Wesson, G. and Wareing, P. R. 1969. The induction of light sensitivity in weed seeds by burial. J. Exp. Bot 63:414–425.Google Scholar
Yelverton, F. H. and Coble, H. D. 1991. Narrow row spacing and canopy formation reduces weed resurgence in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol 5:169–174.Google Scholar