Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:51:53.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prairie cupgrass (Eriochloa contract) and windmillgrass (Chloris verticillata) response to glyphosate and acetyl-CoA carboxylase–inhibiting herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D. Shane Hennigh ,
Kassim Al-Khatib ,
Phillip W. Stahlman  and
Douglas E. Shoup
D. Shane Hennigh
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Phillip W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Agriculture Research Center-Hays, Kansas State University, Hays, KS 67601
Douglas E. Shoup
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A greenhouse experiment was conducted to determine the efficacy of glyphosate and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase)–inhibiting herbicides sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop on prairie cupgrass and windmillgrass. Herbicides were applied at seedling, tillering, and heading growth stages. In addition, a study to determine glyphosate absorption and translocation in both species was conducted. Herbicide treatments were glyphosate at 541, 841, and 1121 g ha−1 and sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop at 350, 210, and 70 g ha−1, respectively. In general, control of prairie cupgrass and windmillgrass increased as the rate of glyphosate increased. In addition, windmillgrass was less susceptible to glyphosate at heading and seedling stages than was prairie cupgrass. Efficacy of all ACCase-inhibiting herbicides applied at any growth stage was equal to or greater than efficacy of the highest rate of glyphosate applied at the same stage. Furthermore, all herbicide treatments were more phytotoxic to prairie cupgrass and windmillgrass at seedling stage than at tillering or heading. Differential response of prairie cupgrass and windmillgrass to glyphosate was attributed to differences in glyphosate translocation. Separate field experiments were conducted to evaluate preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) herbicide treatments for prairie cupgrass and windmillgrass in no-till corn at Hays, KS, in 2001 and 2002. All PRE treatments provided at least 90% control of windmillgrass in both years 6 wk after treatment (WAT). Prairie cupgrass was controlled effectively by acetochlor plus atrazine, alachlor plus atrazine, and S-metolachlor plus atrazine in 2001. In 2002, the only PRE treatments that gave 90% control or greater of prairie cupgrass 6 WAT were alachlor plus atrazine and pendimethalin plus atrazine. Glyphosate sequential treatment was the only POST treatment that provided 100% control of prairie cupgrass and windmillgrass in both years.

Keywords

AcetochloralachloratrazineclethodimpendimethalinquizalofopsethoxydimS-metolachlorprairie cupgrass, Eriochloa contracta Hitchc. ERBCOwindmillgrass, Chloris verticillata Nutt. CHRVEcorn, Zea mays L.Herbicide efficacyherbicide translocation
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , June 2005 , pp. 315 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Weed-Crop Ecology Principles in Weed Management. Scituate, MA: Brenton. Pp. 1–13, 373–398.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Parker, R., and Fruest, E. P. 1992. Foliar absorption and translocation of herbicides from aqueous and treated soil. Weed Sci 40:281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, T. O., Foley, M. E., and Bauman, T. T. 1995. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of imazethapyr in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Sci 43:572–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, A. D. 2000. Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses, and prospects. Pest Manag. Sci 56:299–308.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J. B., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1997. Physiological basis for nicosulfuron and primisulfuron selectivity in five plants species. Weed Sci 45:22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chachalis, D., Reddy, K. N., Elmore, D. D., and Steele, M. L. 2001. Herbicide efficacy, leaf structure, and spray droplet contact angle among Ipomoea species and small flower morningglory. Weed Sci 49:628–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, K. A. and Harvey, R. G. 2000. Glyphosate with and without residual herbicides in no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 14:569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, W. S. and Gunsolus, J. L. 2002. Herbicide Mode of Action and Injury Symptoms. www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/cropsystems/DC3832.html.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. 1989. Phloem translocation of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci 4:191–213.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Pp. 29–52, 67–94, 274– 278.Google Scholar
Dewey, S. A. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. A comparison between glyphosate and assimilate translocation patterns in tall morningglory (Ipomoea purpurea). Weed Sci 31:308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, J. T., Johnson, W. G., Smeda, R. J., Wiebold, W. J., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Reduced rates of sulfentrazone plus chlorimuron and glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci 48:618–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, J. E., Mao, M. K., and Sikorski, J. A. 1997. Glyphosate a unique global herbicide. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. Pp. 1–14, 617–638.Google Scholar
Gates, F. C. 1941. Weeds in Kansas. Topeka, KS: Kansas State Printing Plant. P. 185.Google Scholar
Halford, C., Hamill, A. S., Zhang, J., and Doucet, C. 2001. Critical period of weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 15:737–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halvorson, A. D., Wienhold, B. J., and Black, A. L. 2001. Tillage and nitrogen fertilization influences on grain and soil nitrogen in a spring wheat-fallow system. Agron. J 93:1130–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, P. R. 2001. Use of continuous no-till and rotational tillage systems in the central and northern corn belt. J. Soil Water Conserv 56:286–290.Google Scholar
Hoss, N. E., Al-Khatib, K., Peterson, D. E., and Loughin, T. M. 2003. Efficacy of glyphosate, glufosinate, and imazethapyr on selected weed species. Weed Sci 51:110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, F. C. and Kleier, D. A. 1990. Phloem mobility of xenobiotics. III. Sensitivity of unified model to plant parameters and application to patented chemical hybridizing agents. Weed Sci 38:315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Dilbeck, J. S., Defelice, M. S., and Kendig, J. A. 1998. Weed control with reduced rates of chlorimuron plus metribuzin and imazethapyr in no-till narrow-row soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 12:32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Kendig, J. A., Mussey, R. E., and DeFelice, M. S. 1997. Weed control and economic returns with postemergence herbicides in narrow-row soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol 11:453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Young, B. G., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 2000. Application timing determines giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 14:161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legere, A. and Samson, N. 1999. Relative influence of crop rotation, tillage and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping systems. Weed Sci 47:112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, M. W., Al-Khatib, K., and Maddux, L. 2000. Weed community shifts associated with continuous glyphosate applications in corn and soybean rotation. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 53:22.Google Scholar
Munzik, T. J. 1976. Influence of environmental factors on toxicity to plants. Pages 203–247 in Audus, L. J. ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Ecology. Volume 2. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistic Service. 2002. Report on No-Till acres. www.usda.gov/nass.Google Scholar
Northam, F. E. and Stahlman, P. W. 1997. Prairie cupgrass (Eriochloa contracta) control in fallow. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 52:57–58.Google Scholar
Norwood, C. A. 2001. Planting date, hybrid maturity, and plant population effects on soil water depletion, water use, and yield of dryland corn. Agron. J 93:1034–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. E. and Phillips, S. H. 1984. No-Tillage Agriculture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. Pp. 1–30, 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post-Beittenmiller, D. 1996. Biochemistry and molecular biology of wax production in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol 47:405–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, G. E. and Renner, K. A. 1999. Weed control in navy bean in reduced tillage systems. J. Prod. Agric 12:428–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. 2003. Tumble Windmillgrass. www.noble.org/imagegallery/grasshtml/TumbleWindmill.html.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1980. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 14C-glyphosate in several weed species. Weed Res 20:165–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smika, D. E. 1990. Fallow management practices for wheat production in the central Great Plains. Agron. J 82:319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Shrestha, A., Chandler, K., and Deen, W. 2000. An economic assessment of weed control strategies in no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 14:755–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Vyn, T. J., Chandler, K., and Shrestha, A. 1998. Weed management strategies for no-till soybean (Glycine max) grown on clay soils. Weed Technol 12:660–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unland, R. D., Al-Khatib, K., and Peterson, D. E. 1999. Interactions between imazamox and diphenylethers. Weed Sci 47:462–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uri, N. D. 2000. Perceptions on the use of no-till farming in production agriculture in the United States: an analysis of survey results. Agric. Ecosys. Environ 77:263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanlieshout, L. A. and Loux, M. M. 2000. Interactions of glyphosate with residual herbicides in no-till soybean (Glycine max) production. Weed Technol 14:480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawerence, KS: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 13:478–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci 4:215–231.Google Scholar
Westra, P., Wilson, R., Stahlman, P., Miller, S., Wicks, G., Nissen, S., Chapman, P., and Withrow, J. 2004. Results of six years of weed shift studies in central Great Plains Roundup Ready irrigated and dryland crops. Weed Abstr 44:92.Google Scholar
Yonce, M. H. and Skroch, W. A. 1989. Control of selected perennial weeds with glyphosate. Weed Sci 37:360–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar