Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:34:37.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integration of cover crops and fertilizer rates for weed management in celery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kevin S. Charles
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Darryl D. Warncke
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Kenneth L. Poff
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Mary K. Hausbeck
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824

Abstract

Field studies were carried out in Laingsburg, MI, from 2002 to 2004 on Houghton muck soil to assess the impacts of cover crops and soil fertility regimes on weed populations and celery yield. The cover crops were oilseed radish, cereal rye, hairy vetch, and a bare ground control. The fertility rates were full (180, 90, and 450 kg ha−1 nitrogen [N], phosphorus pentoxide [P2O5], and potassium oxide [K2O], respectively), half (90, 45, and 225 kg ha−1 N, P2O5, and K2O, respectively), and low (90 kg ha−1 N). Each cover crop treatment was combined with the low or half rate of fertilizer. An additional treatment with bare ground plus the full rate of fertilizer was added as standard practice. Treatments were maintained in the same location for the duration of the study. Major weed species were common chickweed, prostrate pigweed, shepherd's-purse, common purslane, and yellow nutsedge. Each year, oilseed radish consistently produced the greatest biomass and provided over 98% early season weed biomass suppression. Hairy vetch and cereal rye provided about 70% weed suppression in early spring. Soil fertility level affected weed populations during the 2004 growing season. In 2004, weed biomass in treatments without cover crops or with vetch increased when greater amounts of fertilizer were applied. Within individual fertility levels, higher celery yields were recorded in the oilseed radish plots. For example, in the low fertility rate, celery yield was 34.8, 29.2, 23.9, and 24.4 ton ha−1 in the oilseed radish, cereal rye, hairy vetch, and control plots, respectively in 2003. Overall, the results of this experiment indicate that when included in a system where hoeing and hand-weeding are the only weed control methods, cover crops can successfully improve weed management and celery yield on muck soils, allowing reduced fertilizer inputs.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Agenbag, G. A. and DeVilliers, O. T. 1989. The effect of nitrogen fertilizers on the germination and seedling emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seed in different soil types. Weed Res 29:239245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkamper, J. 1976. Influence of weed infestation on effect of fertilizer dressings. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr 29:191235.Google Scholar
AmpongNyarko, K. and DeDatta, S. K. 1993. Effects of Nitrogen application on growth, nitrogen use efficiency, and rice–weed interaction. Weed Res 33:269276.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1999. Crop Profile for Celery in Michigan. www.ipmcenters.org/cropprofiles/docs/micelery.html.Google Scholar
Banks, P. A., Santelmann, P. W., and Tucker, B. B. 1976. Influence of long-term soil fertility treatments on weed species in winter wheat. Agron. J 68:825827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute to weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol 9:1,045–1,057.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. P., Putnam, A. R., Burke, B. A., and Aasen, A. J. 1987. Isolation and characterization of allelochemicals in rye herbage. Phytochemistry 26:13851390.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Molnar, L. J., and Janzen, H. H. 2004. Nitrogen fertilizer timing and application method affect weed growth and competition with spring wheat. Weed Sci 52:614622.Google Scholar
Blevins, R. L., Herbek, J. H., and Frye, W. W. 1990. Legume cover crops as a nitrogen source for no-till corn and sorghum. Agron. J 82:769772.Google Scholar
Brown, P. D. and Morra, M. J. 1995. Glucosinolate-containing plant tissues as bioherbicides. J. Agric. Food Chem 43:30703074.Google Scholar
Burket, J. Z., Hemphill, D. D., and Dick, R. P. 1997. Winter cover crops and nitrogen management in sweet corn and broccoli rotations. Hortscience 32:664668.Google Scholar
Chase, W. R., Nair, M. G., and Putnam, A. R. 1991. 2,2′-oxo-1,1′-azobenzene: selective toxicity of rye (Secale cereale L.) allelochemicals to weed and crop species. J. Chem. Ecol 17:919.Google Scholar
Chung, I. M. and Miller, D. A. 1995. Natural herbicide potential of alfalfa residue on selected weed species. Agron. J 87:920925.Google Scholar
Dhima, K. V. and Eleftherohorinos, I. G. 2001. Influence of nitrogen on competition between winter cereals and sterile oat. Weed Sci 49:7782.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 1995. Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through the manipulations of fertilization strategies. Weed Sci 43:491497.Google Scholar
Dyck, E. and Liebman, M. 1994. Soil fertility management as a factor in weed control: the effects of crimson clover residue, synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, and their interaction on emergence and early growth of lambsquarters and sweet corn. Plant Soil 167:227237.Google Scholar
Everaarts, A. P. 1992. Response of weeds to method of fertilizer application on low-fertility acid soils in Suriname. Weed Res 32:391397.Google Scholar
Facelli, J. M. and Pickett, S. T. A. 1991. Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot. Rev 57:132.Google Scholar
Fahey, J. W., Zalcmann, A. T., and Talalay, P. 2001. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 56:551.Google Scholar
Fisk, J. W., Hesterman, O. B., Shrestha, A., Kells, J. J., and Harwood, R. R. 2001. Weed suppression by annual legume cover crops in no-tillage corn. Agron. J 93:319325.Google Scholar
Gallandt, E. R., Liebman, M., and Huggins, D. R. 1999. Improving soil quality: implications for weed management. J. Crop Prod 2:95120.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K., Hartwig, N. L., and Hoffman, D. L. 1984. Cyanazine losses in runoff from no-tillage corn in living and dead mulches vs. unmulched conventional tillage. J. Environ. Qual 13:105110.Google Scholar
Hausbeck, M. K. 2002. Pest Management in the Future: A strategic Plan for Michigan Celery Industry. pestdata.ncsu.edu/pmsp/pdf/MICelery.pdf.Google Scholar
Kuo, S. and Jellum, E. J. 2002. Influence of winter cover crop and residue management on soil nitrogen availability and corn. Agron. J 94:501508.Google Scholar
Kuo, S., Sainju, U. M., and Jellum, E. J. 1997. Winter cover cropping influence on nitrogen in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 61:13921399.Google Scholar
Laufenberg, S. M., Sheley, R. L., Jacobs, J. S., and Borkowski, J. 2005. Herbicide effects on density and biomass of Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) and associated plant species. Weed Technol 19:6272.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Davis, A. S. 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Res 40:2747.Google Scholar
Melander, A. C. and Jorgensen, M. H. 2003. Effects of inter-row hoeing and fertilizer placement on weed growth and yield of winter wheat. Weed Res 43:428438.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. and Teasdale, J. R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia Villosa Roth and Secale Cereale L. residue. Weed Res 33:487499.Google Scholar
Mutch, D. R. and Snapp, S. S. 2003. Cover Crop Choices for Michigan. Bull. E-2884. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Extension. 4 p.Google Scholar
Ngouajio, M. and Mennan, H. 2005. Weed populations and pickling cucumber (Cucumis sativus) yield under summer and winter cover crop systems. Crop Prot 24:521526.Google Scholar
Ngouajio, M. and Mutch, D. R. 2004. Oilseed Radish: A New Cover Crop for Michigan. Bull. E-2907. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Extension. 4 p.Google Scholar
Ngouajio, M., McGriffen, M. E. Jr., and Hutchinson, C. M. 2003. Effects of cover crop and management system on weed populations in lettuce. Crop Prot 22:5764.Google Scholar
Ohno, T. and Doolan, K. L. 2001. Effects of red clover decomposition on phytotoxicity to wild mustard seedling growth. Appl. Soil Ecol 16:187192.Google Scholar
Ohno, T., Doolan, K., Zibilske, L. M., Liebman, M., Gallandt, E. R., and Berube, C. 2000. Phytotoxic effects of red clover amended soils on wild mustard seedling growth. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 78:187192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranells, N. N. and Wagger, M. G. 1996. Nitrogen release from grass and legume cover crop monocultures and bicultures. Agron. J 88:777782.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 7.1. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1030 p.Google Scholar
Sibuga, K. P. and Bandeen, J. D. 1980. Effects of various densities of green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.) and lamb's-quarters (Chenopodium album L.) on nitrogen uptake and yields of corn. East Afr. Agric. For. J 45:214221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sindel, B. M. and Michael, P. W. 1992. Growth and competitiveness of Senecio madagascariensis Poir. (fireweed) in relation to fertilizer use and increases in soil fertility. Weed Res 32:399406.Google Scholar
Snapp, S. S., Swinton, S. M., Labarta, R., Mutch, D., Black, J. R., Leep, R., Nyiraneza, J., and O'Neil, K. 2005. Evaluating cover crops for benefits, cost, and performance within cropping system niches. Agron. J 97:322332.Google Scholar
Stivers-Young, L. 1998. Growth, nitrogen accumulation, and weed suppression by fall cover crops following early harvest of vegetables. Hortscience 33:6063.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1996. Contributions of cover crops to weed management in sustainable agricultural systems. J. Prod. Agric 9:475479.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1998. Cover crops, smother plants, and weed management. Pages 247270 in Hatfield, J. L., Buhler, D. D., and Stewart, B. A. eds. Integrated Weed and Soil Management. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron. J 85:673680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. 2000. The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Sci 48:385392.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Daughtry, C. S. T. 1993. Weed suppression by live and desiccated hairy vetch (Vicia villosa). Weed Sci 41:207212.Google Scholar
Teyker, R. H., Hoelzer, H. D., and Liebl, R. A. 1991. Maize and pigweed response to nitrogen supply and form. Plant Soil 135:287292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1959. United States Standards for Grades of Celery. Effective April 7, 1959. (Reprinted January 1997). www.ams.usda.gov/standards/celery.pdf.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005. Vegetables 2004 Summary. usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/fruit/pvg-bban/vgan0105.pdf.Google Scholar
Utomo, M., Frye, W. W., and Blevins, R. L. 1990. Sustaining soil nitrogen for corn using hairy vetch cover crop. Agron. J 82:979983.Google Scholar
Williams, M. M., Mortensen, D. A., and Doran, J. W. 1998. Assessment of weed and crop fitness in cover crop residues for integrated weed management. Weed Sci 46:595603.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Worsham, A. D., and Chilton, W. S. 1995. Disappearance of DIBOA-glucoside, DIBOA, and BOA from rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop residue. Weed Sci 43:1820.Google Scholar