Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:30:00.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of an Oak (Quercus) Complex with Herbicide Granules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. E. Meyer ,
R. W. Bovey  and
J. R. Baur
R. E. Meyer
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric, Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
R. W. Bovey
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric, Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
J. R. Baur
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric, Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Granule, and in some cases, tablet and ball formulations of bromacil (5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil), dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid), picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid), karbutilate [tert-butylcarbamic acid ester with 3(m-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea], and tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethyl urea} were applied to three areas within 30 km of College Station in the Claypan Resource area of Texas. Woody species growing in the area included blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica Muenchh.), post oak (Quercus stellata Wangenh.), yaupon (Ilex vomitoria Ait.), winged elm (Ulmus alata Michx.), white ash (Fraxinus americana L.), mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa Nutt.), and tree huckleberry (Vaccinium arboreum Marsh.). Granules were applied either broadcast or in rows at several intervals. Tebuthiuron was the most effective herbicide on oaks, winged elm, and white ash. Tebuthiuron and picloram were equally and most effective on yaupon, mockernut hickory, and tree huckleberry. Tebuthiuron + picloram at 2.2 + 2.2 kg/ha was the most effective herbicide treatment on huckleberry. However, a mixture of tebuthiuron + picloram (1:1 w/w) was usually no more effective than the same rate of tebuthiuron in the mixture applied alone. Tablet and ball formulations of karbutilate and tablet formulations of tebuthiuron were generally equally as effective as granules. Applications of picloram and tebuthiuron granules in rows 1.8, 3.0, 4.6, or 6.1 m apart gave control equal to broadcast applications except for picloram on yaupon. On yaupon all row spacing treatments of picloram were less effective than the broadcast treatment, whereas with tebuthiuron the 6.1-m spacing was least effective. Picloram and tebuthiuron granules applied in rows, approximately at 1.8-m intervals with a tractor, were as effective as granules applied by hand in straight rows.

Keywords

Bromacildicambakarbutilatepicloram tebuthiuron
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , September 1978 , pp. 444 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1978. Control of huisache with soil applied herbicides. J. Range Manage. (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., Davis, F. S., Merkle, M. G., and Morton, H. L. 1967. Control of woody and herbaceous vegetation with soil sterilants. Weed Sci 15:327–328.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Meyer, R. E., Flynt, T. O., and Riley, T. E., 1972. Control of yaupon and associated species. Weed Sci. 20:246–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Darrow, R. A. and McCully, W. G., 1959. Brush control and range improvement in the post oak-blackjack oak area of Texas. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 942. 16 p.Google Scholar
5. Flynt, T. O., Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., Riley, T. E., and Baur, J. R. 1976. Granular herbicide applicator for brush control. J. Range Manage. 29:435–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Haas, R. H., Darrow, R. A., and Lehman, S. K. 1964. Evaluation of herbicides for the control of common persimmon. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 17:278–283.Google Scholar
7. Lehman, S. K. and Davis, F. S. 1966. Chemical control of yaupon (Ilex vomitoria Ait.). Proc. South. Weed Conf. 19:287–294.Google Scholar
8. Meyer, R. E., Morton, H. L., Merkle, M. G., Bovey, R. W., and Davis, F. S. 1970. Brush control on forest-rangelands in East Texas. J. Range Manage. 23:129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Miller, W. F. and Starr, J. W. 1967. Interactions between fenuron and environmental factors. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 20:200–205.Google Scholar
10. Mutz, J. L. and Scifres, C. J. 1976. Response of honey mesquite and associated range vegetation to karbutilate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:244 (Abstract).Google Scholar
11. Nation, H. A. 1965. Woody plant control on utility rights-of-way with “Tordon” herbicide pellets. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 18:387–391.Google Scholar
12. Nation, H. A. and Lichy, C. T. 1964. Tordon herbicide for brush control in the southern United States. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 17:287–294.Google Scholar
13. Peevy, F. A. 1970. Banding soil herbicides not promising for hardwood control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 23:225–228.Google Scholar
14. Peevy, F. A. 1973. Bromacil and picloram under southern upland hardwoods. Weed Sci. 21:54–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Peevy, F. A. and Burns, P. Y. 1959. Effectiveness of aerial application of herbicides for hardwood control in Louisiana. Weeds 7:463–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Scifres, C. J. and Haas, R. H. 1974. Vegetation changes in a post oak savannah following woody plant control. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Pub. 1136. 11 p.Google Scholar
17. Shipman, R. D. 1963. Chemical pellets and their use in controlling unwanted hardwoods in South Carolina. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 16:204–208.Google Scholar
18. Shipman, R. D. and Eichert, J. P. 1967. Forest site conversion with soil applied herbicides. J. For. 65:328–334.Google Scholar
19. Smith, H. N. and Rechenthin, C. A. 1964. Grassland Restoration. Part I. The Texas Brush Problem. U.S. Dep. Agric. Soil Conserv. Serv. 49 p.Google Scholar
20. Steinert, W. G. and Stritzke, J. F. 1975. Karbutilate and tebuthiuron for control of brush on pasture land. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:246 (Abstract).Google Scholar
21. Stritzke, J. F. 1972. The effect of herbicide mixtures and additives on winged elm. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:287–293.Google Scholar
22. Stritzke, J. F. 1976. Selective removal of brush by grid placement of herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:255 (Abstract).Google Scholar
23. Wiltse, M. G. 1964. Tordon herbicide as a soil treatment for brush control. Down to Earth 19(4):3–6.Google Scholar