Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:51:10.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cogongrass suppression by intercropping cover crops in corn/cassava systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David Chikoye ,
Friday Ekeleme  and
Udensi E. Udensi
Friday Ekeleme
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
Udensi E. Udensi
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cogongrass is a difficult weed to control in small-scale farming systems and often causes significant crop yield reduction. Field experiments were conducted from 1996 to 1999 at three sites located in the forest/savanna transition zone of Nigeria to determine the influence of intercropping cover crops on cogongrass, corn, and cassava growth. Total cogongrass biomass (shoots and rhizomes) at the onset of the study was highest at Ijaiye (889 g m−2), followed by Umumba (445 g m−2), and least in Ezillo (138 g m−2). Velvetbean had the highest percent ground cover at Umumba and Ijaiye (67 to 89%) 10 wk after planting and shaded the ground longer at all locations. Twelve months after planting, plots with cover crops had 66, 71, and 52% lower cogongrass biomass than the weedy control without cover crops at Ijaiye, Umumba, and Ezillo, respectively. Velvetbean at all locations, L. purpureus at Ijaiye, and tropical kudzu at Umumba and Ezillo were the cover crops most effective in reducing rhizome biomass of cogongrass. Annual weeds dominated the plots sown to cover crops after 2 to 3 yr. At Ijaiye and Umumba, cogongrass competition affected the yield of cassava more than the yield of corn. At all locations, cover crops and weeded control treatments had 27 to 52% more corn grain yield than the weedy control. At Ijaiye, corn grain yields from velvetbean and L. purpureus plots were similar to that from the weeded control plot. At Umumba, all plots with cover crops had corn grain yields similar to that of the weeded control. At all locations, almost all cover crop treatments had cassava root yields higher than the weedy control. Except at Ijaiye, root yields from weeded control plots were 17 to 88% higher than in cover-cropped treatments, suggesting competition between cover crops and cassava.

Keywords

Cassava, Manihot esculenta Crantz ‘TMS 30572’cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. IMPCYcorn, Zea mays L. ‘SUWAN 1 SR’Lablab purpureus (L.)tropical kudzu, Pueraria phaseoloides (Roxb.) Benth.velvetbean, Mucuna cochinchinensis (Lour.) A. Chev.Planted fallowshifting cultivationweed management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 5 , October 2001 , pp. 658 - 667
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Akobundu, I. O. 1981. Weed control in maize-cassava intercrop. Pages 124–128 In Terry, E. R., Oduro, K. A., and Caveness, F. E. (eds). Tropical Root Crops: Research Strategies for the 1980s. Ottawa, Canada: International Research Development Center 163e.Google Scholar
Akobundu, I. O. and Agyakwa, C. W. 1998. A Handbook of West African Weeds. 2nd ed. Ibadan, Nigeria: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. p. 496.Google Scholar
Akobundu, I. O. and Ekeleme, F. 2000. Effect of methods of Imperata cylindrica management on maize grain yield in the derived savanna of southwestern Nigeria. Weed Res. 40:335–341.Google Scholar
Akobundu, I. O. and Poku, J. A. 1985. Control of Imperata cylindrica . Ibadan, Nigeria: Annual Report 1984 of The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. p. 174.Google Scholar
Akobundu, I. O., Udensi, U. E., and Chikoye, D. 2000. Velvetbean (Mucuna spp.) suppresses speargrass (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel) and increases maize yield. Int. J. Pest Manage. 46:103–108.Google Scholar
Anoka, U. A., Akobundu, I. O., and Okonkwo, S.N.C. 1991. Effects of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud and Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit on growth and development of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel. Agrofor. Syst. 16:1–12.Google Scholar
Bryson, C. T. and Carter, R. 1993. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) in the United States. Weed Technol. 7:1005–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsky, R. J., Tarawali, S. A., Becker, M., Chikoye, D., Tian, G., and Sanginga, N. 1998. Mucuna—A Cover Legume with Potential for Multiple Uses. Ibadan, Nigeria: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Resource and Crop Management Division monograph 25. 52 p.Google Scholar
De Rouw, A. 1995. The fallow period as a weed-break in shifting cultivation (tropical rain forests). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 54:31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eussen, J.H.H. 1981. The effect of light intensity on some growth characteristics of alang-alang (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. var. major). Biotrop. Bull. 18:3–12.Google Scholar
Hairiah, K., Van Noordwijk, M., and Setijono, S. 1993. Tolerance to acid soil conditions of the velvetbean Mucuna pruriens var. utilis and M. deeringiana. II. Above-ground growth and control of Imperata cylindrica . Plant Soil 152:175–185.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds—Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. pp. 62–71.Google Scholar
Ivens, G. W. 1975. Studies on Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. and Eupatorium odoratum L. Yarnton, Oxford, Great Britain: Agricultural Research Council Technical Report 37, Weed Research Organization. pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Ivens, G. W., 1980. Imperata cylindrica (L) Beauv. in West African agriculture. Biotrop Spec. Bull. 5:149–156.Google Scholar
Kang, B. T. and Kolawole, G. O. 1997. Effect of seed size and phosphorus fertilization on growth of selected legumes. Commun. Soil-Sci. Plant Anal. 28:1223–1235.Google Scholar
Koch, W., Großmann, F., Weber, A., Lutzeyer, H. J., and Akobundu, I. O. 1990. Weeds as components of maize/cassava cropping systems. Pages 219–244 In von Oppen, M., ed. Standortgemaesse landwirtschaft in West Africa. Stuttgart, Germany: Universitaet Hohenheim.Google Scholar
Macdicken, K. G., Hairiah, K. L., Otsamo, A., Duguma, B., and Majid, N. M. 1997. Shade-based control of Imperata cylindrica: tree fallows and cover crops. Agrofor. Syst. 36:131–149.Google Scholar
Mutsaers, H.J.W., Ezumah, H. C., and Osiru, D.S.O. 1993. Cassava-based intercropping: a review. Field Crops Res. 34:431–457.Google Scholar
Pushpadas, M. V., Mathew, M., and Mohanan, K. G. 1976. Effect of slashing cover crop (Mucuna species) on soil moisture during summer. Rubber Board Bull. 13:36–37.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. H. and Vafabakhsh, K. 1996. The effect of chemical, cultural, and mechanical control methods on growth, production, and dynamics of field weeds. Pages 687–692 In Brown, H., Cussans, G. W., Devine, M. D., et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Santiago, A. 1980. Gene ecological aspects of the Imperata weed and practical implications. Biotrop. Spec. Publ. 5:23–34.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1995. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron. J. 85:673–680.Google Scholar
Terry, P. J., Adjers, G., Akobundu, I. O., Anoka, A. U., Drilling, M. E., Tjitrosemito, S., and Utomo, M. 1997. Herbicides and mechanical control of Imperata cylindrica as a first step in grassland rehabilitation. Agrofor. Syst. 36:151–179.Google Scholar
Townson, J. 1991. Imperata cylindrica and its control. Weed Abstr. 40:457–468.Google Scholar
Udensi, E. U., Akobundu, I. O., Ayeni, A. O., and Chikoye, D. 1999. Management of Imperata cylindrica (Imperata cylindrica) with velvetbean (Mucuna pruriens var. utilis) and herbicides. Weed Technol. 13:201–208.Google Scholar
Versteeg, M. and Koudokpon, V. 1990. Mucuna helps control Imperata in southern Benin. West Afr. Farming Syst. Res. Network Bull. 7:7–8.Google Scholar
Versteeg, M. N., Amadji, F., Eteka, A., Gogan, A., and Koudokpon, V. 1998. Farmers’ adoptability of Mucuna fallowing and agroforestry technologies in the coastal savanna of Benin. Agric. Syst. 56:269–287.Google Scholar
Weber, G., Robert, A.B.C., and Carsky, R. J. 1997. Handbook for Use of LEXSYS (Legume Expert System): Decision Support for Integrating Herbaceous Legumes into Farming Systems. Ibadan, Nigeria: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.Google Scholar